RE: [WebDNA] php/mySQL version of WebDNA Speed Test?

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2009


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 102126
interpreted = N
texte = Hi All, I'm a former WebDNA programmer and I was forced to make the leap to PHP/MySQL. I think WebDNA is great but it never gained momentum and the PHP/MySQL development community has offered tons of Open Source code. Today, I use Content Management Systems (CMS) as a framework for my = clients and make minor programming and design changes for their needs. I'm also dabbling in CakePHP which is similar to Ruby On Rails for Rapid = Application Development. Let me know if you need my assistance in making the leap. If SPEED is the main factor, then I'm sure that WebDNA will run much = faster than PHP/MySQL since the data is stored in memory but unfortunately I = don't have an Apples to Apples comparison. David Taniguchi Kanyon Enterprises =93Web Sites Made Simple=94 dtaniguchi@thekanyon.com (858) 676-3311 =20 -----Original Message----- From: Dan Strong [mailto:webdna@danstrong.com]=20 Sent: Wednesday, March 04, 2009 10:46 AM To: talk@webdna.us Subject: Re: [WebDNA] php/mySQL version of WebDNA Speed Test? Interesting. So do you think the results are displayed incorrectly on = the php/mySQL test (i.e. a=20 decimal is moved over a few places, etc.)? -Dan On Wed, 4 Mar 2009 16:41:26 -0200 christophe.billiottet@webdna.us wrote: > with a chronometer in hand, i get the WebDNA test complete twice as = fast as the php/mysql one=20 >(4s30 for the WebDNA and 9s for the php one). >=20 > chris >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 > On Mar 4, 2009, at 16:25, Dan Strong wrote: >=20 >> Please explain. I am looking for anything to refute this test or =20 >> make it more accurate, since I just went up against my IT dept, as a = >> WebDNA advocate, and am not ready to concede defeat just yet. -Dan >> >> >> On Wed, 4 Mar 2009 16:27:03 -0200 >> christophe.billiottet@webdna.us wrote: >>> "Create 500 folders named 1-500 0.01627s / 1 tick".... not sure =20 >>> if this is reliable. >>> On Mar 4, 2009, at 16:19, Ki Song wrote: >>>> Is the "This Task (seconds / ticks)" column referring to PHP/mySQL >>>> times and the "Total (seconds / ticks)" referring to WebDNA times? >>>> >>>> >>>> On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 1:07 PM, Dan Strong = >>>> wrote: >>>>> I can't believe not a single person replied to this. From what I = >>>>> can see, >>>>> unfortunately, php/mySQL beats the pants off of WebDNA in terms =20 >>>>> of speed, by >>>>> nearly 10 to 1 :( -Dan >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, 03 Mar 2009 17:23:21 -0800 >>>>> "Dan Strong" wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> http://www.danstrong.com/stressTestPHP.php.zip >>>>>> >>>>>> I had someone code this for me. Admittedly, I am no php/mySQL =20 >>>>>> expert, but >>>>>> if the code is an actual apples-to-apples comparison, then the =20 >>>>>> results are >>>>>> very interesting and not at all what I expected. >>>>>> >>>>>> Working example here: >>>>>> http://www.andjelika.com/stressTest/stresstest.php >>>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>>> -Dan >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Mon, 02 Mar 2009 16:20:07 -0800 >>>>>> "Dan Strong" wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Has anyone done an apple-to-apples comparison of php/mySQL vs. = >>>>>>> WebDNA. >>>>>>> The php/mySQL people I ask keep pointing me to 'similar' tests = >>>>>>> that "do a >>>>>>> bunch of stuff", but I'd like to see a side-by-side comparison =20 >>>>>>> of php/mySQL >>>>>>> doing exactly what the WebDNA Speed Test does (i.e. write 500 =20 >>>>>>> folders then >>>>>>> delete them, etc.). Anybody? >>>>>>> -Dan >>>>>>> --------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>>> This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to >>>>>>> the mailing list . >>>>>>> To unsubscribe, E-mail to: >>>>>>> archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us >>>>>>> old archives: http://dev.webdna.us/TalkListArchive/ >>>>>> >>>>>> --------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>> This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to >>>>>> the mailing list . >>>>>> To unsubscribe, E-mail to: >>>>>> archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us >>>>>> old archives: http://dev.webdna.us/TalkListArchive/ >>>>> >>>>> --------------------------------------------------------- >>>>> This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to >>>>> the mailing list . >>>>> To unsubscribe, E-mail to: >>>>> archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us >>>>> old archives: http://dev.webdna.us/TalkListArchive/ >>>>> >>>> --------------------------------------------------------- >>>> This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to >>>> the mailing list . >>>> To unsubscribe, E-mail to: >>>> archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us >>>> old archives: http://dev.webdna.us/TalkListArchive/ >>> --------------------------------------------------------- >>> This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to >>> the mailing list . >>> To unsubscribe, E-mail to: >>> archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us >>> old archives: http://dev.webdna.us/TalkListArchive/ >> >> --------------------------------------------------------- >> This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to >> the mailing list . >> To unsubscribe, E-mail to: >> archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us >> old archives: http://dev.webdna.us/TalkListArchive/ >=20 > --------------------------------------------------------- > This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to > the mailing list . > To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us > old archives: http://dev.webdna.us/TalkListArchive/ --------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us old archives: http://dev.webdna.us/TalkListArchive/ No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG.=20 Version: 7.5.557 / Virus Database: 270.11.7/1983 - Release Date: = 3/4/2009 7:41 AM =20 No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG.=20 Version: 7.5.557 / Virus Database: 270.11.7/1983 - Release Date: = 3/4/2009 7:41 AM =20 Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: [WebDNA] php/mySQL version of WebDNA Speed Test? (christophe.billiottet@webdna.us 2012)
  2. Re: [WebDNA] php/mySQL version of WebDNA Speed Test? (christophe.billiottet@webdna.us 2012)
  3. Re: [WebDNA] php/mySQL version of WebDNA Speed Test? ("Dan Strong" 2009)
  4. Re: [WebDNA] php/mySQL version of WebDNA Speed Test? ("Dan Strong" 2009)
  5. Re: [WebDNA] php/mySQL version of WebDNA Speed Test? (christophe.billiottet@webdna.us 2009)
  6. Re: [WebDNA] php/mySQL version of WebDNA Speed Test? (christophe.billiottet@webdna.us 2009)
  7. Re: [WebDNA] php/mySQL version of WebDNA Speed Test? (christophe.billiottet@webdna.us 2009)
  8. Re: [WebDNA] php/mySQL version of WebDNA Speed Test? ("Dan Strong" 2009)
  9. Re: [WebDNA] php/mySQL version of WebDNA Speed Test? (Bob Minor 2009)
  10. Re: [WebDNA] php/mySQL version of WebDNA Speed Test? (christophe.billiottet@webdna.us 2009)
  11. Re: [WebDNA] php/mySQL version of WebDNA Speed Test? ("Dan Strong" 2009)
  12. RE: [WebDNA] php/mySQL version of WebDNA Speed Test? ("David Taniguchi" 2009)
  13. Re: [WebDNA] php/mySQL version of WebDNA Speed Test? (Donovan Brooke 2009)
  14. Re: [WebDNA] php/mySQL version of WebDNA Speed Test? ("Dan Strong" 2009)
  15. Re: [WebDNA] php/mySQL version of WebDNA Speed Test? (Bob Minor 2009)
  16. Re: [WebDNA] php/mySQL version of WebDNA Speed Test? (christophe.billiottet@webdna.us 2009)
  17. Re: [WebDNA] php/mySQL version of WebDNA Speed Test? ("Dan Strong" 2009)
  18. Re: [WebDNA] php/mySQL version of WebDNA Speed Test? (Bob Minor 2009)
  19. Re: [WebDNA] php/mySQL version of WebDNA Speed Test? ("Dan Strong" 2009)
  20. Re: [WebDNA] php/mySQL version of WebDNA Speed Test? ("Dan Strong" 2009)
  21. Re: [WebDNA] php/mySQL version of WebDNA Speed Test? (Ki Song 2009)
  22. Re: [WebDNA] php/mySQL version of WebDNA Speed Test? ("Dan Strong" 2009)
  23. Re: [WebDNA] php/mySQL version of WebDNA Speed Test? (christophe.billiottet@webdna.us 2009)
  24. Re: [WebDNA] php/mySQL version of WebDNA Speed Test? ("Gary Krockover" 2009)
  25. Re: [WebDNA] php/mySQL version of WebDNA Speed Test? (Bob Minor 2009)
  26. Re: [WebDNA] php/mySQL version of WebDNA Speed Test? (Rich Kwas 2009)
  27. Re: [WebDNA] php/mySQL version of WebDNA Speed Test? (Ki Song 2009)
  28. Re: [WebDNA] php/mySQL version of WebDNA Speed Test? ("Dan Strong" 2009)
  29. Re: [WebDNA] php/mySQL version of WebDNA Speed Test? ("Dan Strong" 2009)
Hi All, I'm a former WebDNA programmer and I was forced to make the leap to PHP/MySQL. I think WebDNA is great but it never gained momentum and the PHP/MySQL development community has offered tons of Open Source code. Today, I use Content Management Systems (CMS) as a framework for my = clients and make minor programming and design changes for their needs. I'm also dabbling in CakePHP which is similar to Ruby On Rails for Rapid = Application Development. Let me know if you need my assistance in making the leap. If SPEED is the main factor, then I'm sure that WebDNA will run much = faster than PHP/MySQL since the data is stored in memory but unfortunately I = don't have an Apples to Apples comparison. David Taniguchi Kanyon Enterprises =93Web Sites Made Simple=94 dtaniguchi@thekanyon.com (858) 676-3311 =20 -----Original Message----- From: Dan Strong [mailto:webdna@danstrong.com]=20 Sent: Wednesday, March 04, 2009 10:46 AM To: talk@webdna.us Subject: Re: [WebDNA] php/mySQL version of WebDNA Speed Test? Interesting. So do you think the results are displayed incorrectly on = the php/mySQL test (i.e. a=20 decimal is moved over a few places, etc.)? -Dan On Wed, 4 Mar 2009 16:41:26 -0200 christophe.billiottet@webdna.us wrote: > with a chronometer in hand, i get the WebDNA test complete twice as = fast as the php/mysql one=20 >(4s30 for the WebDNA and 9s for the php one). >=20 > chris >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 > On Mar 4, 2009, at 16:25, Dan Strong wrote: >=20 >> Please explain. I am looking for anything to refute this test or =20 >> make it more accurate, since I just went up against my IT dept, as a = >> WebDNA advocate, and am not ready to concede defeat just yet. -Dan >> >> >> On Wed, 4 Mar 2009 16:27:03 -0200 >> christophe.billiottet@webdna.us wrote: >>> "Create 500 folders named 1-500 0.01627s / 1 tick".... not sure =20 >>> if this is reliable. >>> On Mar 4, 2009, at 16:19, Ki Song wrote: >>>> Is the "This Task (seconds / ticks)" column referring to PHP/mySQL >>>> times and the "Total (seconds / ticks)" referring to WebDNA times? >>>> >>>> >>>> On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 1:07 PM, Dan Strong = >>>> wrote: >>>>> I can't believe not a single person replied to this. From what I = >>>>> can see, >>>>> unfortunately, php/mySQL beats the pants off of WebDNA in terms =20 >>>>> of speed, by >>>>> nearly 10 to 1 :( -Dan >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, 03 Mar 2009 17:23:21 -0800 >>>>> "Dan Strong" wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> http://www.danstrong.com/stressTestPHP.php.zip >>>>>> >>>>>> I had someone code this for me. Admittedly, I am no php/mySQL =20 >>>>>> expert, but >>>>>> if the code is an actual apples-to-apples comparison, then the =20 >>>>>> results are >>>>>> very interesting and not at all what I expected. >>>>>> >>>>>> Working example here: >>>>>> http://www.andjelika.com/stressTest/stresstest.php >>>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>>> -Dan >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Mon, 02 Mar 2009 16:20:07 -0800 >>>>>> "Dan Strong" wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Has anyone done an apple-to-apples comparison of php/mySQL vs. = >>>>>>> WebDNA. >>>>>>> The php/mySQL people I ask keep pointing me to 'similar' tests = >>>>>>> that "do a >>>>>>> bunch of stuff", but I'd like to see a side-by-side comparison =20 >>>>>>> of php/mySQL >>>>>>> doing exactly what the WebDNA Speed Test does (i.e. write 500 =20 >>>>>>> folders then >>>>>>> delete them, etc.). Anybody? >>>>>>> -Dan >>>>>>> --------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>>> This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to >>>>>>> the mailing list . >>>>>>> To unsubscribe, E-mail to: >>>>>>> archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us >>>>>>> old archives: http://dev.webdna.us/TalkListArchive/ >>>>>> >>>>>> --------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>> This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to >>>>>> the mailing list . >>>>>> To unsubscribe, E-mail to: >>>>>> archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us >>>>>> old archives: http://dev.webdna.us/TalkListArchive/ >>>>> >>>>> --------------------------------------------------------- >>>>> This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to >>>>> the mailing list . >>>>> To unsubscribe, E-mail to: >>>>> archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us >>>>> old archives: http://dev.webdna.us/TalkListArchive/ >>>>> >>>> --------------------------------------------------------- >>>> This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to >>>> the mailing list . >>>> To unsubscribe, E-mail to: >>>> archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us >>>> old archives: http://dev.webdna.us/TalkListArchive/ >>> --------------------------------------------------------- >>> This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to >>> the mailing list . >>> To unsubscribe, E-mail to: >>> archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us >>> old archives: http://dev.webdna.us/TalkListArchive/ >> >> --------------------------------------------------------- >> This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to >> the mailing list . >> To unsubscribe, E-mail to: >> archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us >> old archives: http://dev.webdna.us/TalkListArchive/ >=20 > --------------------------------------------------------- > This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to > the mailing list . > To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us > old archives: http://dev.webdna.us/TalkListArchive/ --------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us old archives: http://dev.webdna.us/TalkListArchive/ No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG.=20 Version: 7.5.557 / Virus Database: 270.11.7/1983 - Release Date: = 3/4/2009 7:41 AM =20 No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG.=20 Version: 7.5.557 / Virus Database: 270.11.7/1983 - Release Date: = 3/4/2009 7:41 AM =20 "David Taniguchi"

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

[OT] HTML render (2003) Show first couple of lines. (2003) Extended [ConvertChars] (1997) Using Plug-In while running 1.6.1 (1997) Exclamation point (1997) Re:Multiple appends with checkboxes (1998) Random tags HELP!!!! (1999) switching users (1998) Re:multiple digests, please stop (1997) Site Search Concepts (2003) ODBC Performance? (2001) funky values using [fileinfo] (2001) really wierd browser truncating (1997) [dos] command question (1997) Opinion: [input] should be called [output] ... (1997) NT error logs (1997) displaying [cart] contents with a pull-down & frames (1998) [WebDNA] Feature Request (2013) Database Updates (1997) videos.. yak..yak (1998)