Re: [WebDNA] Amazon EC2

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2009


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 102667
interpreted = N
texte = >>> We would then not make any money off of of this model. In >>> other words, we would charge per instance the same as >>> what we would pay to Amazon. Re charging: The Amazon model is that they bill the customer, then you =20= get sent any extra that they have collected for you based on the =20 hourly price you set. > The pricing model is a complicated matter here: if we charge $1/=20 > hour, we would exclude the users interested to do their regular =20 > hosting with amazon: with 720 hours a month, a simple slice would =20 > cost the user almost $800 a month for just a DE license. If the =20 > user's plan is just running it few hours, then yes: but we would =20 > charge few dollars for a free license. > > So, our idea was to provide it for free: the customer will not be =20 > able to run more than 3 concurrent requests, which makes it useless =20= > for a web server, but is fine for a test. If (and he will!) the user =20= > is convinced, then he will buy his license with us and get a =20 > relatively cheap hosting at amazon, by just writing his Lic. number =20= > in the admin interface. > > Another point: what licensing model should we adopt if a user runs =20 > not one instance, but several instances of the same server (to add =20 > temporary extra capacity)? As Ken said I'm not telling you how to run your business, just =20 thinking out loud.... I think the free DE version is a good idea, it is something that can =20 be done relatively easily but in the long run I think you would be =20 better off with the hourly charge model. Have a look at = http://aws.amazon.com/devpay/=20 which gives a bit more info. They have a system of =93product token=94 = =20 and =93user token" to keep people from stealing the code/serial numbers. I don't know what would be involved in making WebDNA work with the =20 Amazon system. You might want to contact them and see what they have =20 to say. Paul= Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. [BULK] Re: [WebDNA] Amazon EC2 and WebDNA ("WJ Starck, DDS" 2017)
  2. Re: [WebDNA] Amazon EC2 and WebDNA (Stuart Tremain 2017)
  3. [WebDNA] Amazon EC2 and WebDNA (Matthew Bohne 2017)
  4. Re: [WebDNA] Amazon EC2 (Donovan Brooke 2009)
  5. Re: [WebDNA] Amazon EC2 (Kenneth Grome 2009)
  6. Re: [WebDNA] Amazon EC2 (Paul Willis 2009)
  7. Re: [WebDNA] Amazon EC2 (christophe.billiottet@webdna.us 2009)
  8. Re: [WebDNA] Amazon EC2 (Kenneth Grome 2009)
  9. Re: [WebDNA] Amazon EC2 (Kenneth Grome 2009)
  10. Re: [WebDNA] Amazon EC2 (Donovan Brooke 2009)
  11. Re: [WebDNA] Amazon EC2 (Paul Willis 2009)
  12. Re: [WebDNA] Amazon EC2 (William DeVaul 2009)
  13. Re: [WebDNA] Amazon EC2 (Kenneth Grome 2009)
  14. Re: [WebDNA] Amazon EC2 (Jay Van Vark 2009)
  15. Re: [WebDNA] Amazon EC2 (Donovan Brooke 2009)
  16. [WebDNA] Amazon EC2 (Paul Willis 2009)
>>> We would then not make any money off of of this model. In >>> other words, we would charge per instance the same as >>> what we would pay to Amazon. Re charging: The Amazon model is that they bill the customer, then you =20= get sent any extra that they have collected for you based on the =20 hourly price you set. > The pricing model is a complicated matter here: if we charge $1/=20 > hour, we would exclude the users interested to do their regular =20 > hosting with amazon: with 720 hours a month, a simple slice would =20 > cost the user almost $800 a month for just a DE license. If the =20 > user's plan is just running it few hours, then yes: but we would =20 > charge few dollars for a free license. > > So, our idea was to provide it for free: the customer will not be =20 > able to run more than 3 concurrent requests, which makes it useless =20= > for a web server, but is fine for a test. If (and he will!) the user =20= > is convinced, then he will buy his license with us and get a =20 > relatively cheap hosting at amazon, by just writing his Lic. number =20= > in the admin interface. > > Another point: what licensing model should we adopt if a user runs =20 > not one instance, but several instances of the same server (to add =20 > temporary extra capacity)? As Ken said I'm not telling you how to run your business, just =20 thinking out loud.... I think the free DE version is a good idea, it is something that can =20 be done relatively easily but in the long run I think you would be =20 better off with the hourly charge model. Have a look at = http://aws.amazon.com/devpay/=20 which gives a bit more info. They have a system of =93product token=94 = =20 and =93user token" to keep people from stealing the code/serial numbers. I don't know what would be involved in making WebDNA work with the =20 Amazon system. You might want to contact them and see what they have =20 to say. Paul= Paul Willis

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

WebCat editing, SiteGuard WAS:SiteAssociative lookup style? (1997) Error Lob.db records error message not name (1997) WebDNA Parnter Edition 5.0 ? (2003) Setting up shop (1997) I can help! (1996) Order not created error (never mind) (1997) Not really WebCat (1997) Online magazine- monthly updates and such (1999) turning every 5th line red (1999) Running _every_ page through WebCat-error.html (1997) WebCat2b13MacPlugIn - [showif][search][/showif] (1997) RE: Questions To Answer (1997) WebCat2b13MacPlugIn - [shownext method=post] ??? (1997) TCPsend with POST? (1999) newcart (1997) Less than or equal to........ (1997) Incrementing a number (1998) Width & Height (1998) [WebDNA] Digest from talk@webdna.us (2013) WCS Newbie question (1997)