Re: [WebDNA] [OT] WebDNA Wiki - need grammar check / suggestions
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 2009
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 103962
interpreted = N
texte = 5 nov 2009 kl. 01.04 skrev Donovan Brooke: > Grant Hulbert wrote: >> Sorry, but WebDNA cannot be considered an object-oriented language. =20= >> Flexible; friendly; easy-to-use, yes: but not object-oriented. The =20= >> article will lose credibility if that stays in there. >> On Nov 4, 2009, at 1:44 PM, Donovan Brooke wrote: >>> Though we don't have terms such as "class", "Object", "Method", =20 >>> etc.. >>> I think it can be argued that similar general concepts of those =20 >>> items >>> can be created with WebDNA using the tool set we have. Include, =20 >>> Function, Object, Shell/Dos, Variable scoping etc.. all lend =20 >>> themselves to this idea. I don't have a traditional computer =20 >>> science background > > > Grant, Christer, thanks for the feedback but it would help if you guys > gave reasoning (in regards to the wikipedia article I posted). > =46rom my perspective, the description appears to be more inclusive > than in the scope of only strict compiled (memory allocating) =20 > languages. The very foundation for OOP is the use of objects (instances of =20 classes which can have properties and methods, all encapsulated within =20= the class) and inheritance (subclasses of objects that can share all =20 or just some of their super's properties and methods). Best, Christer ************************************************************* Christer Olsson PO Box 9160 Phone +46 40 25 85 85 Ljusa Id=E9er AB SE-200 39 Malmo Fax +46 40 25 85 89 Kantyxegatan 5 Sweden http://www.ljusaideer.se
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
5 nov 2009 kl. 01.04 skrev Donovan Brooke: > Grant Hulbert wrote: >> Sorry, but WebDNA cannot be considered an object-oriented language. =20= >> Flexible; friendly; easy-to-use, yes: but not object-oriented. The =20= >> article will lose credibility if that stays in there. >> On Nov 4, 2009, at 1:44 PM, Donovan Brooke wrote: >>> Though we don't have terms such as "class", "Object", "Method", =20 >>> etc.. >>> I think it can be argued that similar general concepts of those =20 >>> items >>> can be created with WebDNA using the tool set we have. Include, =20 >>> Function, Object, Shell/Dos, Variable scoping etc.. all lend =20 >>> themselves to this idea. I don't have a traditional computer =20 >>> science background > > > Grant, Christer, thanks for the feedback but it would help if you guys > gave reasoning (in regards to the wikipedia article I posted). > =46rom my perspective, the description appears to be more inclusive > than in the scope of only strict compiled (memory allocating) =20 > languages. The very foundation for OOP is the use of objects (instances of =20 classes which can have properties and methods, all encapsulated within =20= the class) and inheritance (subclasses of objects that can share all =20 or just some of their super's properties and methods). Best, Christer ************************************************************* Christer Olsson PO Box 9160 Phone +46 40 25 85 85 Ljusa Id=E9er AB SE-200 39 Malmo Fax +46 40 25 85 89 Kantyxegatan 5 Sweden http://www.ljusaideer.se
Christer Olsson
DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!
Top Articles:
Talk List
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...
Related Readings:
TEXTAREA and sendmail (1998)
Sorry WebCat server not running (2001)
Requiring that certain fields be completed (1997)
syntax question, not in online refernce (1997)
[OT] Display Glitch (2004)
Summing fields (1997)
RE: creating writefile data from a nested search (1997)
Formating found categories (1997)
WebDNA Commerce Single for MAC 6.0 (2008)
Connect to MySQL (2002)
Grant, please help me ... (1997)
Emailer Timing out (1999)
[WebDNA] special chars (2009)
Robots fill event log (1997)
Support ?? (1997)
Another IfThenElse question.. (2003)
Add (1998)
Searchable archives gone again??? (2000)
Limit on nested [ShowIf]'s? (1997)
Webcat no longer supported? (2006)