Re: [WebDNA] [OT] WebDNA Wiki - need grammar check / suggestions

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2009


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 103951
interpreted = N
texte = I purposely didn't go into all the reasons why, because the simplest thing to do is leave out that sentence. Rather that writing a wiki entry "WebDNA is not object-oriented because...", why not just simply omit any references to object-orentation, thus preventing anyone from begging the question. I could write a treatise on how not object-oriented it is, but why would anyone post that into the wiki? WebDNA also doesn't make pancakes, but I see no reason to mention that either. On Nov 4, 2009, at 4:04 PM, Donovan Brooke wrote: > Grant, Christer, thanks for the feedback but it would help if you guys > gave reasoning (in regards to the wikipedia article I posted). Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: [WebDNA] [OT] WebDNA Wiki - need grammar check / suggestions (Donovan Brooke 2009)
  2. Re: [WebDNA] [OT] WebDNA Wiki - need grammar check / suggestions (Donovan Brooke 2009)
  3. Re: [WebDNA] [OT] WebDNA Wiki - need grammar check / suggestions (Patrick McCormick 2009)
  4. Re: [WebDNA] [OT] WebDNA Wiki - need grammar check / suggestions (Christer Olsson 2009)
  5. Re: [WebDNA] [OT] WebDNA Wiki - need grammar check / suggestions (Frank Nordberg 2009)
  6. Re: [WebDNA] [OT] WebDNA Wiki - need grammar check / suggestions (Donovan Brooke 2009)
  7. Re: [WebDNA] [OT] WebDNA Wiki - need grammar check / suggestions (Grant Hulbert 2009)
  8. Re: [WebDNA] [OT] WebDNA Wiki - need grammar check / suggestions (Donovan Brooke 2009)
  9. Re: [WebDNA] [OT] WebDNA Wiki - need grammar check / suggestions (Stuart Tremain 2009)
  10. Re: [WebDNA] [OT] WebDNA Wiki - need grammar check / suggestions (Christer Olsson 2009)
  11. Re: [WebDNA] [OT] WebDNA Wiki - need grammar check / suggestions (Dan Strong 2009)
  12. Re: [WebDNA] [OT] WebDNA Wiki - need grammar check / suggestions (Grant Hulbert 2009)
  13. Re: [WebDNA] [OT] WebDNA Wiki - need grammar check / suggestions (Donovan Brooke 2009)
  14. Re: [WebDNA] [OT] WebDNA Wiki - need grammar check / suggestions (Donovan Brooke 2009)
  15. Re: [WebDNA] [OT] WebDNA Wiki - need grammar check / suggestions (Tana Adams 2009)
  16. Re: [WebDNA] [OT] WebDNA Wiki - need grammar check / suggestions (Brian Fries 2009)
  17. Re: [WebDNA] [OT] WebDNA Wiki - need grammar check / suggestions (Donovan Brooke 2009)
  18. Re: [WebDNA] [OT] WebDNA Wiki - need grammar check / suggestions (Donovan Brooke 2009)
  19. Re: [WebDNA] [OT] WebDNA Wiki - need grammar check / suggestions (Donovan Brooke 2009)
  20. Re: [WebDNA] [OT] WebDNA Wiki - need grammar check / suggestions (Donovan Brooke 2009)
  21. Re: [WebDNA] [OT] WebDNA Wiki - need grammar check / suggestions (Marc Thompson 2009)
  22. Re: [WebDNA] [OT] WebDNA Wiki - need grammar check / suggestions (Donovan Brooke 2009)
  23. Re: [WebDNA] [OT] WebDNA Wiki - need grammar check / suggestions (Donovan Brooke 2009)
  24. Re: [WebDNA] [OT] WebDNA Wiki - need grammar check / suggestions (Marc Thompson 2009)
  25. Re: [WebDNA] [OT] WebDNA Wiki - need grammar check / suggestions (Marc Thompson 2009)
  26. Re: [WebDNA] [OT] WebDNA Wiki - need grammar check / suggestions (Marc Thompson 2009)
  27. Re: [WebDNA] [OT] WebDNA Wiki - need grammar check / suggestions (Donovan Brooke 2009)
  28. Re: [WebDNA] [OT] WebDNA Wiki - need grammar check / suggestions (Donovan Brooke 2009)
  29. Re: [WebDNA] [OT] WebDNA Wiki - need grammar check / suggestions (Donovan Brooke 2009)
  30. Re: [WebDNA] [OT] WebDNA Wiki - need grammar check / suggestions (Marc Thompson 2009)
  31. Re: [WebDNA] [OT] WebDNA Wiki - need grammar check / suggestions (Toby Cox 2009)
  32. Re: [WebDNA] [OT] WebDNA Wiki - need grammar check / suggestions (Matthew Bohne 2009)
  33. Re: [WebDNA] [OT] WebDNA Wiki - need grammar check / suggestions (Dan Strong 2009)
  34. [WebDNA] [OT] WebDNA Wiki - need grammar check / suggestions (Donovan Brooke 2009)
I purposely didn't go into all the reasons why, because the simplest thing to do is leave out that sentence. Rather that writing a wiki entry "WebDNA is not object-oriented because...", why not just simply omit any references to object-orentation, thus preventing anyone from begging the question. I could write a treatise on how not object-oriented it is, but why would anyone post that into the wiki? WebDNA also doesn't make pancakes, but I see no reason to mention that either. On Nov 4, 2009, at 4:04 PM, Donovan Brooke wrote: > Grant, Christer, thanks for the feedback but it would help if you guys > gave reasoning (in regards to the wikipedia article I posted). Grant Hulbert

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

multiple product databases (1997) Sendmail strangie (2002) You know you have made your client successfully when... (2003) Another Large Database Questions (1997) Fun with dates (1997) wc 2 pro users - sites, quotes wanted (1997) Major Security Hole (1998) 2.0 Info (1997) Don't know if this is a silly question... (2003) Can't load tmpl files (1997) [OT] Ratings comparison? (2003) Proper file locations (1997) Ready,Set; Print! (1999) BBEdit and WebCatalog 2.0? (1997) file browser. (2002) Tracking System? (1997) Cart Question (1998) webcatalog for linux (1998) [WebDNA] API Integration (2010) RE: Credit card processing - UK (1997)