Re: [WebDNA] Serial numbers and pricing for WebDNA 7.0
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 2011
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 106119
interpreted = N
texte = > [snip] > Clearly there are less heavy alternatives and I suppose if there were = enough complaints I could change it. Hi Dan, Chris, anyone reading.. I finally looked at the two webdna.us firefox tabs I had kept = permanently open for awhile.. and noticed both were running secure = (https:// (!)). It looks like the way that happened is that once one = gets here: http://www.webdna.us/forum/graphiteforums_forums/ then the links along the top navbar are all for their secure = counterparts. (I am guessing that was not intentional (?).) I was referencing the docs with SSL. Anyway, no wonder it seemed slow = to me. Sometimes it seems even slower than that would account for... and not = because of any 100-200k graphic Dan. I don't even get a response = sometimes for like 10+ seconds, and I have a fast cable internet = connection. Anyway my point was just to ask about peoples' experience (who are on = the inside) with heavily trafficked webdna servers.. not complain = about the website. It's fine, except for the perfectionist streak in = us, when it strikes. ;-) (On that note, the main thing I would fix is = the forum posts' emails that get sent to subscribers, when they contain = code.) -G
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
> [snip] > Clearly there are less heavy alternatives and I suppose if there were = enough complaints I could change it. Hi Dan, Chris, anyone reading.. I finally looked at the two webdna.us firefox tabs I had kept = permanently open for awhile.. and noticed both were running secure = (https:// (!)). It looks like the way that happened is that once one = gets here: http://www.webdna.us/forum/graphiteforums_forums/ then the links along the top navbar are all for their secure = counterparts. (I am guessing that was not intentional (?).) I was referencing the docs with SSL. Anyway, no wonder it seemed slow = to me. Sometimes it seems even slower than that would account for... and not = because of any 100-200k graphic Dan. I don't even get a response = sometimes for like 10+ seconds, and I have a fast cable internet = connection. Anyway my point was just to ask about peoples' experience (who are on = the inside) with heavily trafficked webdna servers.. not complain = about the website. It's fine, except for the perfectionist streak in = us, when it strikes. ;-) (On that note, the main thing I would fix is = the forum posts' emails that get sent to subscribers, when they contain = code.) -G
Govinda
DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!
Top Articles:
Talk List
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...
Related Readings:
Problems problems problems (1997)
redirect from the errorsMessages.db entry (1997)
Help name our technology! (1997)
Claris HomePage messes up the code (1997)
Rubbish in form fields (2004)
Does webcatalog recognise NULL values? (1998)
What am I missing (1997)
Instructions for Digest (1997)
Getting Emailer to send mail (1997)
WebCat2: Formulas.db question (1997)
3rd request: What are SMSI's upgrade policies? (2003)
WebDNA performance comparisons? (2004)
Parse question (2005)
Word Bolding (1996)
addlineitems within formvariable loop (1998)
WebCat2b13 Mac plugin - [sendmail] and checkboxes (1997)
WC Database Format (1997)
Modifying order output (1997)
WebCatalog for guestbook ? (1997)
stumped (2001)