Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA app

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2013


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 110911
interpreted = N
texte = I vote single binary as well. Looks like there is some interest. =20 Licensing would have to still phone home I guess to verify serial number = as I think Web Catalog did. It=92s not that these machines don=92t have internet access, it=92s that = some clients don=92t want their data in the cloud, and telling them I = have to install a web server on a stand along PC, or their network = server, and then I have to deal with their network manager, it just gets = into too many issues for them, they don=92t understand, and they and = don=92t want to buy what they don=92t understand. If I say, well I just = have to install one app, it=92s easy to sell. Hey, it=92s just like = installing Office. That they understand. Ideally I would be able to install on the office file server as well. = Maybe you could sell licenses by number of users? These are small clients for me, probably the WebDNA developers with = large clients would not use this, so I think it opens up a market for = smaller businesses. If a particular application needs PHP I guess that = is a reason to say you need to have a Cloud based solution. But there = are so many things that can be done just with WebDNA alone it would = certainly open up my markets. Thanks for considering. Frank On Nov 28, 2013, at 8:29 PM, christophe.billiottet@webdna.us wrote: > Hi Frank! how would you see that? a kind of =93WebDNA + built-in web = server=94 in one single binary? or a pre-built WebDNA + webserver = installation? >=20 >=20 > - chris >=20 >=20 >=20 > On Nov 28, 2013, at 5:02 PM, C. Frank Wolfe wrote: >=20 >> Since I don=92t seem to be the only one up at this hour (4 am in = Hawaii), does anyone else think it would be a GREAT idea to have a = runtime version or WebDNA, or an App that you could run on a single = computer? I have clients that I could do so much with, but they won=92t = put data on the internet even with a secure server. >>=20 >> I supposed it would have to have a little web server built in, but it = would be so much easier than convincing some of these companies to = install ISS or whatever on their network or adding a box just for = WebDNA. A network version would be even better, and I would pay for = those each and every time and bill the client. One price for a single = computer, more for the network version. >>=20 >> Christophe/Donovan? >>=20 >> Hopefully, >>=20 >> Frank >>=20 >> --------------------------------------------------------- This = message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . = To unsubscribe, E-mail to: archives: = http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us Bug Reporting: = support@webdna.us >=20 Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA app (Rich Kwas 2013)
  2. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA app (frank@cwolfe.com 2013)
  3. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA app (Stuart Tremain 2013)
  4. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA app (christophe.billiottet@webdna.us 2013)
  5. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA app (frank@cwolfe.com 2013)
  6. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA app (frank@cwolfe.com 2013)
  7. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA app (frank@cwolfe.com 2013)
  8. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA app (Dan Strong 2013)
  9. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA app (Steve Graham 2013)
  10. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA app (Dan Strong 2013)
  11. RE: [WebDNA] WebDNA app ("Terry Nair" 2013)
  12. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA app (frank@cwolfe.com 2013)
  13. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA app (Dan Strong 2013)
  14. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA app (WebDNA 2013)
  15. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA app (christophe.billiottet@webdna.us 2013)
  16. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA app (WebDNA 2013)
  17. RE: [WebDNA] WebDNA app ("Terry Nair" 2013)
  18. RE: [WebDNA] WebDNA app ("Terry Nair" 2013)
  19. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA app (WebDNA 2013)
  20. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA app (christophe.billiottet@webdna.us 2013)
  21. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA app, Terry (WebDNA 2013)
  22. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA app, Terry (frank@cwolfe.com 2013)
  23. RE: [WebDNA] WebDNA app ("Terry Nair" 2013)
  24. [WebDNA] WebDNA app (frank@cwolfe.com 2013)
  25. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA app store (Dan Strong 2011)
  26. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA app store (Scott Walters 2011)
  27. [WebDNA] WebDNA app store (Govinda 2011)
  28. [WebDNA] WebDNA applications (Chris 2008)
I vote single binary as well. Looks like there is some interest. =20 Licensing would have to still phone home I guess to verify serial number = as I think Web Catalog did. It=92s not that these machines don=92t have internet access, it=92s that = some clients don=92t want their data in the cloud, and telling them I = have to install a web server on a stand along PC, or their network = server, and then I have to deal with their network manager, it just gets = into too many issues for them, they don=92t understand, and they and = don=92t want to buy what they don=92t understand. If I say, well I just = have to install one app, it=92s easy to sell. Hey, it=92s just like = installing Office. That they understand. Ideally I would be able to install on the office file server as well. = Maybe you could sell licenses by number of users? These are small clients for me, probably the WebDNA developers with = large clients would not use this, so I think it opens up a market for = smaller businesses. If a particular application needs PHP I guess that = is a reason to say you need to have a Cloud based solution. But there = are so many things that can be done just with WebDNA alone it would = certainly open up my markets. Thanks for considering. Frank On Nov 28, 2013, at 8:29 PM, christophe.billiottet@webdna.us wrote: > Hi Frank! how would you see that? a kind of =93WebDNA + built-in web = server=94 in one single binary? or a pre-built WebDNA + webserver = installation? >=20 >=20 > - chris >=20 >=20 >=20 > On Nov 28, 2013, at 5:02 PM, C. Frank Wolfe wrote: >=20 >> Since I don=92t seem to be the only one up at this hour (4 am in = Hawaii), does anyone else think it would be a GREAT idea to have a = runtime version or WebDNA, or an App that you could run on a single = computer? I have clients that I could do so much with, but they won=92t = put data on the internet even with a secure server. >>=20 >> I supposed it would have to have a little web server built in, but it = would be so much easier than convincing some of these companies to = install ISS or whatever on their network or adding a box just for = WebDNA. A network version would be even better, and I would pay for = those each and every time and bill the client. One price for a single = computer, more for the network version. >>=20 >> Christophe/Donovan? >>=20 >> Hopefully, >>=20 >> Frank >>=20 >> --------------------------------------------------------- This = message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . = To unsubscribe, E-mail to: archives: = http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us Bug Reporting: = support@webdna.us >=20 frank@cwolfe.com

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

Multiple 'Users.db' files not possible (1997) Return records from another (1997) Summing fields (1997) Preventing Merchant Settling ? (1997) SiteEdit Pro Update Announcement (1997) NT version and O'reily's WebSite (1997) FlushDatabase Suggestion (1998) How can I Add several Items into the cart at once? (1997) shipping costs (2000) YACBQ.....(Yet another checkbox question) (2000) MOOOOOO (2000) Encrypt broken on Mac 3.05b13?? (2000) woops - speed results - right subject (2002) Bug Report, maybe (1997) Summing fields (1997) E-Mail (1998) [WebDNA] php/mySQL version of WebDNA Speed Test? (2009) How many lookups does it take ... (2003) Pre-parse hell (2008) [date format] w/in sendmail (1997)