Re: Include vs. lookup?
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 1998
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 16021
interpreted = N
texte = At 09:59 AM 2/15/98, Kenneth Grome wrote: >Since an [include] has to hit the disk to see if the file's been changed since the last time it was loaded into WebCat's RAM cache, but a [lookup] doesn't have to hit the disk first, I think a [lookup] will be faster than an [include] most of the time, is this correct?How does this work? For ALL includes, do the files get stored in RAM?Aloha, Olin
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
At 09:59 AM 2/15/98, Kenneth Grome wrote: >Since an
[include] has to hit the disk to see if the file's been changed since the last time it was loaded into WebCat's RAM cache, but a
[lookup] doesn't have to hit the disk first, I think a
[lookup] will be faster than an
[include] most of the time, is this correct?How does this work? For ALL includes, do the files get stored in RAM?Aloha, Olin
Olin Lagon
DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!
Top Articles:
Talk List
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...
Related Readings:
Help with Shipping Costs (1997)
Test (2000)
[OT] Disable/enable field (2003)
OT: Who is? (2004)
Nationality (2003)
WebCat2b15MacPlugin - showing [math] (1997)
One Hour Email (2002)
more cookie crumbling (1999)
Help name our technology! (1997)
WCS Newbie question (1997)
[BULK] [WebDNA] Clean URLS job - will pay (2010)
Summing fields (1997)
acrobat -> wc (1998)
GIMP (2005)
Summing fields (1997)
WebCat2 - Getting to the browser's username/password data (1997)
Date search bug (1997)
RE: too many nested [xxx] (1997)
Price Not Appearing (2000)
Searching multiple Databases (1997)