Re: Separate server for jpg/gif files

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

1998


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 19114
interpreted = N
texte = At 9:49 Uhr 27.07.1998, Sandra L. Pitner wrote:>If the grpahics server is only serving graphics, no >fancy processing, etc., it doesn't need to be a powerful machine. Sandy,we had a diagram some time ago, published by Starnine. It showed a significant lower performance if the image-server is on the same network(!) and slower than the main server. At least with WebStar. Two different experiences on our site: We had a Mac 9500 as webserver and ran RushHour on a Quadra 700 with PM-Card. Speed was slower than with just one server (same network). A couple of months we used a server in the States for the images and the webserver was here in Austria. That worked fine. So I believe the downgraded performance depends on the location of the servers, local network seemed to be slow if both machines are not of equal speed.Peter__________________________________________ Peter Ostry - po@ostry.com - www.ostry.com Ostry & Partner - Ostry Internet Solutions Auhofstrasse 29 A-1130 Vienna Austria fon ++43-1-8777454 fax ++43-1-8777454-21 Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: Separate server for jpg/gif files (Peter Ostry 1998)
  2. Re: Separate server for jpg/gif files (Sandra L. Pitner 1998)
  3. Re: Separate server for jpg/gif files (Peter Ostry 1998)
  4. Re: Separate server for jpg/gif files (Sandra L. Pitner 1998)
  5. Re: Separate server for jpg/gif files (Peter Ostry 1998)
  6. Re: Separate server for jpg/gif files (Gil Poulsen 1998)
  7. Separate server for jpg/gif files (andre@adsp.com (de Saint Phalle, Andre) 1998)
At 9:49 Uhr 27.07.1998, Sandra L. Pitner wrote:>If the grpahics server is only serving graphics, no >fancy processing, etc., it doesn't need to be a powerful machine. Sandy,we had a diagram some time ago, published by Starnine. It showed a significant lower performance if the image-server is on the same network(!) and slower than the main server. At least with WebStar. Two different experiences on our site: We had a Mac 9500 as webserver and ran RushHour on a Quadra 700 with PM-Card. Speed was slower than with just one server (same network). A couple of months we used a server in the States for the images and the webserver was here in Austria. That worked fine. So I believe the downgraded performance depends on the location of the servers, local network seemed to be slow if both machines are not of equal speed.Peter__________________________________________ Peter Ostry - po@ostry.com - www.ostry.com Ostry & Partner - Ostry Internet Solutions Auhofstrasse 29 A-1130 Vienna Austria fon ++43-1-8777454 fax ++43-1-8777454-21 Peter Ostry

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

Looking for WebDNA 3.08 MAC (2003) SiteEdit NewFile.html ? (1997) update on wn searching (1997) WebCat is different user (1999) Checkboxes (1998) replacing founditems ... (2002) Setting up shop (1997) Single Link browsing (1997) NT or Mac (1997) Micro-managing External Links (2006) AOL and webcat (1998) [SHOWIF AND/OR] (1997) Practice runs ? (1997) A dynamic database. (1997) textarea input truncated at 255 chars (1999) carriage returns in data (1997) How To get Some Help (2003) WC2b15 File Corruption (1997) WebCat b15 Mac plug-in (1997) page chokes on hideif when false and ignored (1998)