Re: nesting limits?

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

1998

It keeps the original formatting. numero = 19154
interpreted = N
texte = >>[include [interpret][include file=somefile¶m=valueOne][/interpret]]>>So what you're hoping for is something that looks like this?>[include [include file=somefile¶m=valueOne]]>And the results of that inner [include] would be a filename?Yes, more or less. Let's see if I can explain this better. Here's my hierarchy, I have three separate files to deal with in this situation:Template.tpl [include includeFile.inc]IncludeFile.inc [include [interpret][include file=somefile¶m=valueOne][/interpret]]somefile ../full/path/to/some/file/to/be/includedAs you can see, the somefile value is a full path to the file I want included in the outer [include] context (of the includeFile.inc file). But without the [interpret] context, WebCat doesn't work. The only thing I can figure is that this nested include code is itself in an include file, so I'm guessing that WebCat stops interpreting at the first nested [include].If that's the case, it will never find a file located at a raw file path that looks like:[include file=somefile¶m=valueOne]because there is obviously no such path. :(Of course, I cannot actually see what's going on here because [include] tags does not display the raw file reference when it cannot find an [include] file. Instead it displays a generic error message from the errormessages.db, and that's no help in debugging. Therefore I'm simply ASSUMING that placing nested include code in an include file is *not* acceptable -- unless [interpret] is used to make it work.Is this the problem?Sincerely,Ken Grome808-737-6499WebDNA Solutionsmailto:ken@webdna.nethttp://www.webdna.net Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

Re: nesting limits? (Kenneth Grome 1998)
Re: nesting limits? (PCS Technical Support 1998)
Re: nesting limits? (Kenneth Grome 1998)
Re: nesting limits? (Jay Van Vark 1998)
Re: nesting limits? (Kenneth Grome 1998)
Re: nesting limits? (Dave MacLeay 1998)
Re: nesting limits? (PCS Technical Support 1998)
Re: nesting limits? (Kenneth Grome 1998)
Re: nesting limits? (PCS Technical Support 1998)
nesting limits? (Kenneth Grome 1998)

>>[include [interpret][include file=somefile¶m=valueOne][/interpret]]>>So what you're hoping for is something that looks like this?>[include [include file=somefile¶m=valueOne]]>And the results of that inner [include] would be a filename?Yes, more or less. Let's see if I can explain this better. Here's my hierarchy, I have three separate files to deal with in this situation:Template.tpl [include includeFile.inc]IncludeFile.inc [include [interpret][include file=somefile¶m=valueOne][/interpret]]somefile ../full/path/to/some/file/to/be/includedAs you can see, the somefile value is a full path to the file I want included in the outer [include] context (of the includeFile.inc file). But without the [interpret] context, WebCat doesn't work. The only thing I can figure is that this nested include code is itself in an include file, so I'm guessing that WebCat stops interpreting at the first nested [include].If that's the case, it will never find a file located at a raw file path that looks like:[include file=somefile¶m=valueOne]because there is obviously no such path. :(Of course, I cannot actually see what's going on here because [include] tags does not display the raw file reference when it cannot find an [include] file. Instead it displays a generic error message from the errormessages.db, and that's no help in debugging. Therefore I'm simply ASSUMING that placing nested include code in an include file is *not* acceptable -- unless [interpret] is used to make it work.Is this the problem?Sincerely,Ken Grome808-737-6499WebDNA Solutionsmailto:ken@webdna.nethttp://www.webdna.net Kenneth Grome

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Re: nesting limits?

1998

Top Articles:

Related Readings: