Re: TRAINING videos - Prove IT.
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 1998
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 21548
interpreted = N
texte = > Martin Gertz Bech wrote:>> You just forget a firewall because Linux aint secure enough, (at least not> for my solutions where some of my customers actually has the law telling> them about security issues!>> Linux, well Linux is fast enough indeed, but i would not considder it> reliable in the matter of up-time.>> I have a example of the tability that i want in my solutions.> http://www.yak-yak.com which is a Macbased server not running WebCat,> (atleast not yet)>> Now the server has been up for more than a year, with no crash!>> In its lifetime it has only had a few crashes explained by powerfailure.>> Thats stability that ROCKS! Linux can't offer me this.>> If something goes wrong on a linux box, it's much more complex to> administer, why i have to spend much more time doing this, than if the> solution has been on a mac server.I personally know of a Linux box that has been up for 2 and a half years (Ihave seen the uptime output withmy own eyes).My personal box as been on and up since I installed Linux 4 months ago (butthen again I am not serving).Excet when I recomplied my kernels (twice).On the other hand *every* mac I have *ever* seen crashes daily.More than daily... our servers are down hourly almost, the desktops are aboutthe same.No offense I like MAC. Its my second most favorite system.If at work we had the money I would be on one. But I am stuck in WIn.Your experience is the first I have heard of, and I congradulate you.But as far as Linux...Out of ALL the people i know and I can provide names if you like, Linux onlygoes down when you shut itdown.Security on the other hand...With a well thought out network and some attention to detail it as good as any.I have no problems with fixing problems on Linux. But then again I haven't hadany :)It started out as a RH 5.0 running 2.0.31 kerrnel. And is now RH 5.1 withKernnel 3.0.36Around christmas it will be 5.2 with 2.2... no reinstalls just upgrading.But keep in mind I have no servers instaled no httpd, or ftpd, not sendmail,and I try to keep up with securityfixes.Now that is performance that rocks!This is good though, I have never heard a MAC - Linux pro vs con discussion.MAC vs. Win Win vs. Linux.... no Linux vs. MACNow MAC running Linux...I will soon have an old powerbook running mklinuk!!! I can't wait!!!
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
> Martin Gertz Bech wrote:>> You just forget a firewall because Linux aint secure enough, (at least not> for my solutions where some of my customers actually has the law telling> them about security issues!>> Linux, well Linux is fast enough indeed, but i would not considder it> reliable in the matter of up-time.>> I have a example of the tability that i want in my solutions.> http://www.yak-yak.com which is a Macbased server not running WebCat,> (atleast not yet)>> Now the server has been up for more than a year, with no crash!>> In its lifetime it has only had a few crashes explained by powerfailure.>> Thats stability that ROCKS! Linux can't offer me this.>> If something goes wrong on a linux box, it's much more complex to> administer, why i have to spend much more time doing this, than if the> solution has been on a mac server.I personally know of a Linux box that has been up for 2 and a half years (Ihave seen the uptime output withmy own eyes).My personal box as been on and up since I installed Linux 4 months ago (butthen again I am not serving).Excet when I recomplied my kernels (twice).On the other hand *every* mac I have *ever* seen crashes daily.More than daily... our servers are down hourly almost, the desktops are aboutthe same.No offense I like MAC. Its my second most favorite system.If at work we had the money I would be on one. But I am stuck in WIn.Your experience is the first I have heard of, and I congradulate you.But as far as Linux...Out of ALL the people i know and I can provide names if you like, Linux onlygoes down when you shut itdown.Security on the other hand...With a well thought out network and some attention to detail it as good as any.I have no problems with fixing problems on Linux. But then again I haven't hadany :)It started out as a RH 5.0 running 2.0.31 kerrnel. And is now RH 5.1 withKernnel 3.0.36Around christmas it will be 5.2 with 2.2... no reinstalls just upgrading.But keep in mind I have no servers instaled no httpd, or ftpd, not sendmail,and I try to keep up with securityfixes.Now that is performance that rocks!This is good though, I have never heard a MAC - Linux pro vs con discussion.MAC vs. Win Win vs. Linux.... no Linux vs. MACNow MAC running Linux...I will soon have an old powerbook running mklinuk!!! I can't wait!!!
Josh
DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!
Top Articles:
Talk List
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...
Related Readings:
OLD ORDERS (1998)
Parameter Passing Value (2002)
Searching multiple fields from one form field (1997)
WebCatalog NT beta 18 problem (1997)
All questions are welcome on this list (1997)
Re2: frames & carts (1997)
Performance: deafening silence (1999)
RequiredFields template (1997)
Replace context problem ... (1997)
[WebDNA] Installing WebDNA on VPS (2008)
Foreign Language [DATE] formats (2004)
Sorry WebCat server not running (2001)
WebCatalog and Webstar 3.02 (1998)
multiple search commands (1997)
[LOOKUP] (1997)
Stat analyzer (1997)
Web Catalog vs. ICAT (1997)
[WebDNA] TCPCONNECT & Timeout (2015)
Hideif / Showif (1998)
WebCat2 - [include] tags (1997)