Re: OT: Amazon Patents

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2000


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 28612
interpreted = N
texte = Nicolas Verhaeghe wrote at 06/03/00 16:27>The problem is: they did it. They did patent a common web technique called >Setting a cookie to identify your visitors.Yes, and the patent office has been letting people pay for patents that get invalidated in the courts ever since it was established. So, nothing new there.>All it takes is ONE court to enforce the patent to create jurisprudency.Well, then all it takes is one court to over rule it too!? Precedence has a hierarchy, higher courts set it for lower courts, no the other way around. -- Clive------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re[2]: Re[2]: Re[2]: OT: Amazon Patents (jpeacock@univpress.com 2000)
  2. Re: Re[2]: Re[2]: OT: Amazon Patents (Nicolas Verhaeghe 2000)
  3. Re: Re[2]: Re[2]: OT: Amazon Patents (Bob Minor 2000)
  4. Re[2]: Re[2]: OT: Amazon Patents (jpeacock@univpress.com 2000)
  5. Re: Re[2]: OT: Amazon Patents (Bob Minor 2000)
  6. Re: OT: Amazon Patents (Clive Bruton 2000)
  7. Re: Re[2]: OT: Amazon Patents (Nicolas Verhaeghe 2000)
  8. Re[2]: OT: Amazon Patents (jpeacock@univpress.com 2000)
  9. Re: OT: Amazon Patents (Nicolas Verhaeghe 2000)
  10. Re: OT: Amazon Patents (Will Starck 2000)
  11. Re: OT: Amazon Patents (Charles Kline 2000)
  12. Re: OT: Amazon Patents (Nicolas Verhaeghe 2000)
  13. Re: OT: Amazon Patents (Clive Bruton 2000)
  14. Re: OT: Amazon Patents (Bob Minor 2000)
  15. Re: OT: Amazon Patents (Mike Davis 2000)
  16. Re: OT: Amazon Patents (Christopher Feyrer 2000)
  17. Re: OT: Amazon Patents (Brad Eisenberg 2000)
  18. Re: OT: Amazon Patents (Brad Eisenberg 2000)
  19. Re: OT: Amazon Patents (Christopher Feyrer 2000)
  20. OT: Amazon Patents (Mike Davis 2000)
Nicolas Verhaeghe wrote at 06/03/00 16:27>The problem is: they did it. They did patent a common web technique called >Setting a cookie to identify your visitors.Yes, and the patent office has been letting people pay for patents that get invalidated in the courts ever since it was established. So, nothing new there.>All it takes is ONE court to enforce the patent to create jurisprudency.Well, then all it takes is one court to over rule it too!? Precedence has a hierarchy, higher courts set it for lower courts, no the other way around. -- Clive------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Clive Bruton

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

can WC render sites out? (1997) WebDNA on OS X Tiger (2006) validatin on NT (1998) [WebDNA] ListFiles question (2012) [WebDNA] WebDNA 7 multiple fcgid processes (2012) encrypting templates.... (2000) Two submit buttons ? (1997) Displaying search results in a new frameset (1997) WebCat for Site Search? (1997) Type 11 errors setting up WebCAt 2 (1997) Can't load tmpl files (1997) Ready,Set; Print! (1999) Modifying order output (1997) Pixo support? (1998) [WebDNA] "Safe Write for Database" setting.... (2016) Summing fields (1997) IIS4 (1998) math on date? (1997) trouble updating records in database (1998) OT: How to convert TIFs into HTML or ASCII format? (2002)