Re: OT: Poll Results
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 2002
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 42258
interpreted = N
texte = You guys are @#$% depressing. It's already Monday and that's depressing enough.Alisha S. OutridgeSpec Simple, Inc.Where the World of Design Connects...On Monday, August 5, 2002, at 02:04 PM, Alex McCombie wrote:> On 8/5/02 11:31 AM, Donovan
wrote:>>> Good, I need something to sober me up... anyway,>> Not sure I get what you mean... It looks to me like:>>>> 1.) there is not that many people who use DNA ;-)> Yep. I guess I had a skewed perspective on how many. (I was surprised > to see> the small number).>>>> 2.) If you do, its a good language for an entrepeneur.> There in lies the debate. We have done well with Webdna. We have > dealt> with some very large corporate clients. The last site finished was a 65> database Oracle/ASP makeover with a considerable price tag. But....> I simply cannot tell you how difficult it has been to compete> recommending a product with such a small and unknown market share. It > has> been a truly frustrating experience to lose out on one opportunity after> another because the perspective simply could not get behind an unknown.> Eventually we had to submit to delivering duel recommendations with> different price tags. We would try to use large financial incentives to > lure> the client away from the larger ASP/ORACLE quote. It really didn't work > all> that much, but did help to ensure that we wouldn't be summarily > eliminated> because of our platform recommendation.>> I, and everyone I have ever discussed this with, know that I feel > that> WebDNA can perform circles around Microsoft solutions in nearly all mid> range corporate projects both in raw performance and reliability. (the > lack> of multi-machine data syncing being the only major drawback)... But most> clients with a checkbook would rather pay extra for a solution that is> widely supported and thus (in their logic) more readily serviced in the > long> haul.>> I am drawn back to the experience I had when I worked for Kodak in > their> digital imaging division. Back then I couldn't understand why Kodak > wanted> to help seed Cannon with their digital imaging technology as they were > in> direct competition. The logic then was simple. If you are the only one > on a> large market with a technology, or worse, the only one with a superior > yet> unknown technology then you are in the uncomfortable position of having > to> 'convert' the whole world (or at least enough to be self sustaining). > If you> could bring in your friends and competitors then anything they sell, or> advertise, or succeed in has the 'potential' to benefit you and your > market> of the compatible technology. At the very least they were helping > educate> the market on the value of the technology. A dangerous game to be sure, > but> alas....>> Personally I know I haven't done myself any great advantage over the > years> by making the decision to forgo becoming a ASP/ORACLE expert in > exchange for> becoming a WebDNA expert. I can only hope that my position on the > survey (a> entrepreneur) doesn't ever change ;-) Because in the job market I would > be> in a bit of trouble ;-)>> Anyway... I digress ;-)>> Back to the grind.> Alex>>>>>> Alex J McCombie New World Media> Chief Information Officer Drawer 607> 800/724.8973 Fair Haven, NY 13064> Alex@NewWorldMedia.com http://OurClients.com>> Interface Designer WebDNA Programmer Database Designer>>>> -------------------------------------------------------------> This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to> the mailing list .> To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to digest@talk.smithmicro.com>> Web Archive of this list is at: http://search.smithmicro.com/>>-------------------------------------------------------------This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list .To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://search.smithmicro.com/
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
You guys are @#$% depressing. It's already Monday and that's depressing enough.Alisha S. OutridgeSpec Simple, Inc.Where the World of Design Connects...On Monday, August 5, 2002, at 02:04 PM, Alex McCombie wrote:> On 8/5/02 11:31 AM, Donovan wrote:>>> Good, I need something to sober me up... anyway,>> Not sure I get what you mean... It looks to me like:>>>> 1.) there is not that many people who use DNA ;-)> Yep. I guess I had a skewed perspective on how many. (I was surprised > to see> the small number).>>>> 2.) If you do, its a good language for an entrepeneur.> There in lies the debate. We have done well with Webdna. We have > dealt> with some very large corporate clients. The last site finished was a 65> database Oracle/ASP makeover with a considerable price tag. But....> I simply cannot tell you how difficult it has been to compete> recommending a product with such a small and unknown market share. It > has> been a truly frustrating experience to lose out on one opportunity after> another because the perspective simply could not get behind an unknown.> Eventually we had to submit to delivering duel recommendations with> different price tags. We would try to use large financial incentives to > lure> the client away from the larger ASP/ORACLE quote. It really didn't work > all> that much, but did help to ensure that we wouldn't be summarily > eliminated> because of our platform recommendation.>> I, and everyone I have ever discussed this with, know that I feel > that> WebDNA can perform circles around Microsoft solutions in nearly all mid> range corporate projects both in raw performance and reliability. (the > lack> of multi-machine data syncing being the only major drawback)... But most> clients with a checkbook would rather pay extra for a solution that is> widely supported and thus (in their logic) more readily serviced in the > long> haul.>> I am drawn back to the experience I had when I worked for Kodak in > their> digital imaging division. Back then I couldn't understand why Kodak > wanted> to help seed Cannon with their digital imaging technology as they were > in> direct competition. The logic then was simple. If you are the only one > on a> large market with a technology, or worse, the only one with a superior > yet> unknown technology then you are in the uncomfortable position of having > to> 'convert' the whole world (or at least enough to be self sustaining). > If you> could bring in your friends and competitors then anything they sell, or> advertise, or succeed in has the 'potential' to benefit you and your > market> of the compatible technology. At the very least they were helping > educate> the market on the value of the technology. A dangerous game to be sure, > but> alas....>> Personally I know I haven't done myself any great advantage over the > years> by making the decision to forgo becoming a ASP/ORACLE expert in > exchange for> becoming a WebDNA expert. I can only hope that my position on the > survey (a> entrepreneur) doesn't ever change ;-) Because in the job market I would > be> in a bit of trouble ;-)>> Anyway... I digress ;-)>> Back to the grind.> Alex>>>>>> Alex J McCombie New World Media> Chief Information Officer Drawer 607> 800/724.8973 Fair Haven, NY 13064> Alex@NewWorldMedia.com http://OurClients.com>> Interface Designer WebDNA Programmer Database Designer>>>> -------------------------------------------------------------> This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to> the mailing list .> To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to digest@talk.smithmicro.com>> Web Archive of this list is at: http://search.smithmicro.com/>>-------------------------------------------------------------This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list .To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://search.smithmicro.com/
Alisha Outridge
DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!
Top Articles:
Talk List
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...
Related Readings:
HTML email (2004)
User/pass with tcpconnect (2000)
more on quicktime test stuff (1997)
Need relative path explanation (1997)
2.0 Beta (1997)
Greeting Card System (2000)
Where is Typhoon 3.x? (2000)
[WebDNA] TCPconnect (2012)
authenticating a second user (1997)
Sending Faxes (2003)
WebCat2b14MacPlugIn - [include] doesn't hide the search string (1997)
New Command prefs ... (1997)
Strange database format import (2000)
RE: [WebDNA] read database from other domain (2015)
Frames and WebCat (1997)
Off-Topic: Optimal WebSTAR settings for WebDNA plugin v4.5 (2002)
Will webdna execute before a [redirect]? (1999)
OT: Backup Strategies (2007)
unitshipcost vs shipcosts (1997)
letterrip and webcats emailer (1998)