Re: Hyperlink in email
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 2002
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 43360
interpreted = N
texte = I started (very early stages) to write (if even for just my own personal use) a form of the online doc's that could have notes appended to each page (ala the doc's on php.net). Simple concept, an append to a database that is associated by pagename. The one page in the current docs that has the multiple tags on it has to be split into individual pages, but it's just a big cut-n-paste job.My point is, I don't understand why SMSI hasn't implemented this simple form of the online docs. It would be great to post corrections, snippets, comments, gotcha's, etc for every tag.Reading the info on php.net, I gather that anyone can post a note to a page, and someone that maintains that site polices it every now and then for bogus information. This might be what's keeping SMSI from adding such a feature. Also, they might argue that that's what the archive list is for. But the counter-point is: it's a pain to look up a tag, not find the information (or example) that you want, and then have to go dig through the archives in hopes of finding that information.I dunno, I'd like to hear your all's comments on this.GK> >on 9/12/02 5:13 PM, Paul at paul@ast.jagrove.com so noted... > > > >> Is there an easy way to send html emails with webcat and its emailer? > > > >There should be a link on the archive search page *just* for this topic. > >: ) > > Actually, the archives should be the place where SMSI *employees* go > to collect the information that has been discussed several times -- > information that, if placed in the HTML docs, would help people to > write their webdna properly WITHOUT having to resort to searching the > list archives. > > This software has been around for 5+ years already ... so why is it > that the HTML docs still have so FEW practical or useful webdna > coding examples in it? > > Everyone seems to think that the answer is to send people to the > archives, but I think the answer is BETTER DOCUMENTATION -- with > practical webdna coding examples copied directly from the archives > and placed into the docs so everyone can find and use them > immediately -- instead of being sent to the archives every time the > docs are deficient. > > > Sincerely, > Kenneth Grome ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list
. To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://search.smithmicro.com/
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
I started (very early stages) to write (if even for just my own personal use) a form of the online doc's that could have notes appended to each page (ala the doc's on php.net). Simple concept, an append to a database that is associated by pagename. The one page in the current docs that has the multiple tags on it has to be split into individual pages, but it's just a big cut-n-paste job.My point is, I don't understand why SMSI hasn't implemented this simple form of the online docs. It would be great to post corrections, snippets, comments, gotcha's, etc for every tag.Reading the info on php.net, I gather that anyone can post a note to a page, and someone that maintains that site polices it every now and then for bogus information. This might be what's keeping SMSI from adding such a feature. Also, they might argue that that's what the archive list is for. But the counter-point is: it's a pain to look up a tag, not find the information (or example) that you want, and then have to go dig through the archives in hopes of finding that information.I dunno, I'd like to hear your all's comments on this.GK> >on 9/12/02 5:13 PM, Paul at paul@ast.jagrove.com so noted... > > > >> Is there an easy way to send html emails with webcat and its emailer? > > > >There should be a link on the archive search page *just* for this topic. > >: ) > > Actually, the archives should be the place where SMSI *employees* go > to collect the information that has been discussed several times -- > information that, if placed in the HTML docs, would help people to > write their webdna properly WITHOUT having to resort to searching the > list archives. > > This software has been around for 5+ years already ... so why is it > that the HTML docs still have so FEW practical or useful webdna > coding examples in it? > > Everyone seems to think that the answer is to send people to the > archives, but I think the answer is BETTER DOCUMENTATION -- with > practical webdna coding examples copied directly from the archives > and placed into the docs so everyone can find and use them > immediately -- instead of being sent to the archives every time the > docs are deficient. > > > Sincerely, > Kenneth Grome ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://search.smithmicro.com/
Gary Krockover
DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!
Top Articles:
Talk List
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...
Related Readings:
Location of Browser Info.txt file (1997)
HideIf ip= OR ip= (1998)
Need relative path explanation (1997)
WebCat2 beta 11 - new prefs ... (1997)
about this server and links to who (1997)
Empty Shopping Carts? (1998)
Enhanced Master Counter? (1997)
fieldnamesdir=ra equivalent for [sql] (2002)
nude virgin confusion?? (2004)
really wierd date stuff on NT (1997)
Bulk capture for Authorize.net (2004)
HELP WITH DATES (1997)
Speed Admin? (Was FlushDatabases) (1997)
Shared conversion under WebTen (1998)
[WebDNA] naming math vars in v.7 (2010)
Preventing Merchant Settling ? (1997)
[WebDNA] anyone know why webdna kicking out incorrect dates? (2008)
notification solutions (1997)
Multiple Ad databases? (1997)
customer info (2001)