Re: I've been thinking
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 2002
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 44326
interpreted = N
texte = I think this might be usefull, also since there are so many intracacies that just are not available in the given docs... This would be a good place to keep track of bugs also. The problem would be keeping it valid... We don't have a problem here on the list with that because (for instance) if I make a suggestion that either is wrong or inefficient, someone else will come in and correct it. If something was implimented that allow a vote of, lets say, 2 or more developers to get rid of someone's suggestion, that might be a way of keeping the system free of bad advice. ;-)Alain might be a good choice to build something like this also because (I'm assuming he) consistantly offers up efficient solutions.Also, I think these interactive web docs should contain a place to post solutions... (or at least a see redeyeinteractive for a free download) or something. there are a great deal of little widgets offered up that are a great resource.DonovanGary Krockover wrote:> How about doing the interactive version of the webDNA web docs, as discussed > before here, where us visitors could annotate notes to pages ala the PHP > manual. (notes, code snippets, catch-alls, pit-falls, etc). > > I actually started this project, and it's fairly simple. I was just getting > bogged down in rewriting the online docs in a non-framed version. Also, > there's a page where several global tags (maybe others) are all grouped onto > one page and are separated by a named anchor. One would want those on > individual pages for the blogging system. > > My suggestion, but has SMSI said that they are adding this with the > developers section thingy that they are working on? I need to search for > the latest on that, when is the projected launch date and is this a free > service? No, it's not, I think I know that already. Ok, my suggestion > stands, a FREE version of the interactive docs where we could annotate our > notes to it. > > GK >-- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------------<><> Donovan Brooke <><>->ï ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list
. To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://search.smithmicro.com/
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
I think this might be usefull, also since there are so many intracacies that just are not available in the given docs... This would be a good place to keep track of bugs also. The problem would be keeping it valid... We don't have a problem here on the list with that because (for instance) if I make a suggestion that either is wrong or inefficient, someone else will come in and correct it. If something was implimented that allow a vote of, lets say, 2 or more developers to get rid of someone's suggestion, that might be a way of keeping the system free of bad advice. ;-)Alain might be a good choice to build something like this also because (I'm assuming he) consistantly offers up efficient solutions.Also, I think these interactive web docs should contain a place to post solutions... (or at least a see redeyeinteractive for a free download) or something. there are a great deal of little widgets offered up that are a great resource.DonovanGary Krockover wrote:> How about doing the interactive version of the webDNA web docs, as discussed > before here, where us visitors could annotate notes to pages ala the PHP > manual. (notes, code snippets, catch-alls, pit-falls, etc). > > I actually started this project, and it's fairly simple. I was just getting > bogged down in rewriting the online docs in a non-framed version. Also, > there's a page where several global tags (maybe others) are all grouped onto > one page and are separated by a named anchor. One would want those on > individual pages for the blogging system. > > My suggestion, but has SMSI said that they are adding this with the > developers section thingy that they are working on? I need to search for > the latest on that, when is the projected launch date and is this a free > service? No, it's not, I think I know that already. Ok, my suggestion > stands, a FREE version of the interactive docs where we could annotate our > notes to it. > > GK >-- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------------<><> Donovan Brooke <><>->ï ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://search.smithmicro.com/
Donovan
DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!
Top Articles:
Talk List
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...
Related Readings:
[showif],[refferer],[include] in errormessages.db (2002)
Newbie Tax Question (1997)
[WebDNA] ubuntu permissions can't append db (2019)
WebCatalog & Mac OS X (client) vs. Redhat Linux (2001)
WebCat2b13MacPlugIn - [showif][search][/showif] (1997)
Where's Cart Created ? (1997)
Hyperboard/bulletin board available (1998)
Creating folders and deleting files (1997)
SKU (1997)
taxrate - off by 1 cent (1997)
[WebDNA] Re-sending emails (2017)
Weird Cookie (2007)
Multiple security dbs (1997)
Sorting via date (2002)
ARGH! (2003)
Shipping charges (1998)
Encrypting the URL Query String (2003)
WebCat2: multiple currency support (1997)
problems with 2 tags (1997)
New Plug-in and Type 11 errors (1997)