Re: FREE Stuff ..

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2003


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 47726
interpreted = N
texte = > just that it seemed > a bit surprising to see a web professional not using one. Your comment > ended in a smiley, and mine should have as well, as I was trying to be > lightly sarcastic. > The issue of standards based code and graceful degradation do not come > into play in this situation, though. This site was not so much > designed to _not_ work in NN4, as it was that is was simply published > with some code errors. Whenever a page is mostly or entirely blank in > NN4, I look first at tables. NN4 (and correctly so) does not make > assumptions about tables that are incorrectly coded. Looking at the > source on the SmithMicro page, I noticed the table error immediately:Actually, I never looked through the code - I do enough of that on sites I develop. The point still remains that the site was obviously not checked in all browsers. And, yes, I was being a smart alec. I do have several browsers installed on my computer, and it just happened that the browser I was currently running is the one that would not load the page. As for why it seems that I tend to favor NN 4.x, I have no logical explaination. It crashes constantly, and I run into sites that I cannot use on it. But, I just don't really care for 6 or 7 - they are too dog-slow. Since I prefer to use Netscape for mail, I have just hung onto it until they fix the super slowness of the latest version of NN. But, when I am running OSX, I tend to favor Explorer - go figure. From a development perspective, since NN 4.x is so anal when it comes to code, I figure that if it loads in that browser, it should load in all others (although it rarely looks the same).Dennis ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: FREE Stuff ... (Sales 2003)
  2. Re: FREE Stuff .. (Donovan home EHG 2003)
  3. Re: FREE Stuff .. (Gary Krockover 2003)
  4. Re: FREE Stuff .. (Dennis J. Bonsall, Jr. 2003)
  5. Re: Needed, free hex-calculator was - FREE Stuff .. (Gary Krockover 2003)
  6. Re: FREE Stuff .. (Phillip Bonesteele 2003)
  7. Re: FREE Stuff .. (Dan Strong 2003)
  8. Re: FREE Stuff .. (Dan Strong 2003)
  9. Re: FREE Stuff .. (Gregg Luhring 2003)
  10. Re: FREE Stuff .. (Donovan 2003)
  11. Re: FREE Stuff .. (Velma Kahn 2003)
  12. Re: FREE Stuff .. (Michael Davis 2003)
  13. Re: FREE Stuff .. (Dennis J. Bonsall, Jr. 2003)
  14. Re: FREE Stuff .. (Dennis J. Bonsall, Jr. 2003)
  15. Re: FREE Stuff .. (Michael Davis 2003)
  16. Re: FREE Stuff .. (Gary Krockover 2003)
  17. Re: FREE Stuff .. (Kenneth Grome 2003)
  18. Re: FREE Stuff .. (Alain Russell 2003)
  19. Re: FREE Stuff .. (Dennis J. Bonsall, Jr. 2003)
  20. Re: FREE Stuff .. (Stuart Tremain 2003)
  21. FREE Stuff .. (Alain Russell 2003)
> just that it seemed > a bit surprising to see a web professional not using one. Your comment > ended in a smiley, and mine should have as well, as I was trying to be > lightly sarcastic. > The issue of standards based code and graceful degradation do not come > into play in this situation, though. This site was not so much > designed to _not_ work in NN4, as it was that is was simply published > with some code errors. Whenever a page is mostly or entirely blank in > NN4, I look first at tables. NN4 (and correctly so) does not make > assumptions about tables that are incorrectly coded. Looking at the > source on the SmithMicro page, I noticed the table error immediately:Actually, I never looked through the code - I do enough of that on sites I develop. The point still remains that the site was obviously not checked in all browsers. And, yes, I was being a smart alec. I do have several browsers installed on my computer, and it just happened that the browser I was currently running is the one that would not load the page. As for why it seems that I tend to favor NN 4.x, I have no logical explaination. It crashes constantly, and I run into sites that I cannot use on it. But, I just don't really care for 6 or 7 - they are too dog-slow. Since I prefer to use Netscape for mail, I have just hung onto it until they fix the super slowness of the latest version of NN. But, when I am running OSX, I tend to favor Explorer - go figure. From a development perspective, since NN 4.x is so anal when it comes to code, I figure that if it loads in that browser, it should load in all others (although it rarely looks the same).Dennis ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ Dennis J. Bonsall, Jr.

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

WebCat2b13MacPlugIn - [include] doesn't allow creator (1997) Round to the nearest half! (2008) creator code (1997) Sorting by date (1997) More on the email templates (1997) Upgrade to WebCat2 from Commerce Lite (1997) [Fwd: Rotating Banners ... (was LinkExchange)] (1997) WebCat2: Items xx to xx shown, etc. (1997) Odd Cart Behavior (1997) ssl support WDNA 5.0 (2003) Just testing (2003) Use of Back and Reload Buttons on ShoppingCart page? (1997) f2 download problems (1997) Examples of cross-selling with WebCatalog? (1998) [WebDNA] How to code a 301 redirect (2008) Sandbox DB permissions (2005) Imagemagick and fonts (2004) Extra Text Fields (was Another question) (1997) [delete] problem (1997) setting taxable to true (1997)