Re: Pirated WebCat? NOT...
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 2003
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 49805
interpreted = N
texte = >Maybe some of us would benefit from some sort of >mannerism checker add-in that will scan all outbound email messages for >rude, obnoxious and/or paranoia content.Shoot, I'd never get any email sent... ;pOn Fri, 25 Apr 2003 12:59:49 Kimberly D. Walls
wrote: >Unfortunately for SM, I agree Joe. I also agree with the opinion that >programmers should be made aware of the feature. For those who have no >malicious intent, I doubt that it would be a problem. However, I'm sure >if there are some sorts of security concerns that need to be addressed, >SM would be happy to do so. I doubt that SM is in business solely to >destroy WebDNA programmers and/or their businesses. > >But we live, learn and hopefully come to know that we can't please >everyone. >I would hate to be turned into some kind of freakishly disgruntled, >psychopathic, malicious employee, employer or developer every time I >made a mistake or even a debatable business decision. > >If the license log mechanism concerns some of us, we have the right to >question it and its potential insecurities, but I think there's an >proper way to go about it. In my opinion, some of the comments that are >being posted to this list, ironically enough, are just as ill-intended >as their accusations. Maybe some of us would benefit from some sort of >mannerism checker add-in that will scan all outbound email messages for >rude, obnoxious and/or paranoia content. > >By the way Joe, this is not directed specifically toward you. I simply >agree with your previous statement. > >Kim > > > > >-----Original Message----- >From: WebDNA Talk [mailto:WebDNA-Talk@talk.smithmicro.com] On Behalf Of >Joe D'Andrea >Sent: Friday, April 25, 2003 12:19 PM >To: WebDNA Talk >Subject: Re: Pirated WebCat? NOT... > >Sorry Doug... but your message to the hosting company opened with: > >>-----Original Message----- >>From: Doug Deck [mailto:DDeck@smithmicro.com] >>Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2003 11:23 AM >>To: ssmith@publichost.com >>Subject: WebDNA License question >> >>We are trying to track down what seems to be a pirated WebDNA license >hosted >>at: >> >>IP: XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX >>Hostname: robot1 >>Key: WCAT-XXX-XXX-XXX-XXX > >If as you say you are interested in clearing up your registration >databases or helping registered owners become compliant, then your >first message to their ISP would not accuse them of running a pirated >license of your software. > >~joe > > >------------------------------------------------------------- >This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to > the mailing list . >To unsubscribe, E-mail to: >To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to > >Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ > > >------------------------------------------------------------- >This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to > the mailing list . >To unsubscribe, E-mail to: >To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to >Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/------------------------------------------------------------ http://www.StrongGraphicDesign.com (208) 319-0137 | Toll-free p/f 877-561-1656 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
>Maybe some of us would benefit from some sort of >mannerism checker add-in that will scan all outbound email messages for >rude, obnoxious and/or paranoia content.Shoot, I'd never get any email sent... ;pOn Fri, 25 Apr 2003 12:59:49 Kimberly D. Walls wrote: >Unfortunately for SM, I agree Joe. I also agree with the opinion that >programmers should be made aware of the feature. For those who have no >malicious intent, I doubt that it would be a problem. However, I'm sure >if there are some sorts of security concerns that need to be addressed, >SM would be happy to do so. I doubt that SM is in business solely to >destroy WebDNA programmers and/or their businesses. > >But we live, learn and hopefully come to know that we can't please >everyone. >I would hate to be turned into some kind of freakishly disgruntled, >psychopathic, malicious employee, employer or developer every time I >made a mistake or even a debatable business decision. > >If the license log mechanism concerns some of us, we have the right to >question it and its potential insecurities, but I think there's an >proper way to go about it. In my opinion, some of the comments that are >being posted to this list, ironically enough, are just as ill-intended >as their accusations. Maybe some of us would benefit from some sort of >mannerism checker add-in that will scan all outbound email messages for >rude, obnoxious and/or paranoia content. > >By the way Joe, this is not directed specifically toward you. I simply >agree with your previous statement. > >Kim > > > > >-----Original Message----- >From: WebDNA Talk [mailto:WebDNA-Talk@talk.smithmicro.com] On Behalf Of >Joe D'Andrea >Sent: Friday, April 25, 2003 12:19 PM >To: WebDNA Talk >Subject: Re: Pirated WebCat? NOT... > >Sorry Doug... but your message to the hosting company opened with: > >>-----Original Message----- >>From: Doug Deck [mailto:DDeck@smithmicro.com] >>Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2003 11:23 AM >>To: ssmith@publichost.com >>Subject: WebDNA License question >> >>We are trying to track down what seems to be a pirated WebDNA license >hosted >>at: >> >>IP: XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX >>Hostname: robot1 >>Key: WCAT-XXX-XXX-XXX-XXX > >If as you say you are interested in clearing up your registration >databases or helping registered owners become compliant, then your >first message to their ISP would not accuse them of running a pirated >license of your software. > >~joe > > >------------------------------------------------------------- >This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to > the mailing list . >To unsubscribe, E-mail to: >To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to > >Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ > > >------------------------------------------------------------- >This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to > the mailing list . >To unsubscribe, E-mail to: >To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to >Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/------------------------------------------------------------ http://www.StrongGraphicDesign.com (208) 319-0137 | Toll-free p/f 877-561-1656 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/
Dan Strong
DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!
Top Articles:
Talk List
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...
Related Readings:
HTML mapped to WebCat (2001)
Training Videos for 3.0 (1998)
Using EIMS instead of Emailer (1998)
Updating one table with another (1998)
Multiple 'Users.db' files not possible (1997)
[protect] on NT? (1997)
Date problems (1997)
Emailer Problem (1998)
Feature req. (2002)
WebCat2: multiple currency support (1997)
Webcat/Webmerchant part II (1998)
includes and cart numbers (1997)
UPS Quick Cost Calculator (1997)
Webcat2, WebCommerce, Mod 10 etc. (1997)
SMSI, please fix the StandardConversions.db (2005)
[WriteFile] problems (1997)
[WebDNA] 6.2.1 fails on Apache 2.4.6 (2014)
Mozilla/4. and Browser Info.txt (1997)
suffix mapping, use of cache, etc. (1997)
ShowNext Command (1997)