Re: Pirated WebCat? NOT...

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2003


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 49779
interpreted = N
texte = >The issue is simple: when we buy your software, it's ours > >I was under the impression that we never 'own' software: the company >sell a licence to use a copy - hence, 'licence'. The difference is immaterial in this situation. Whether it is actually owned by us or licensed to us by the company, the issue still stands that this can be considered a possible invasion of privacy and a potentially huge security threat that we were never properly informed of.And whatever happened to the responsibility of the company to INFORM us of bizarre new features of the software, especially when the new features add NOTHING to our functional use of the software, but instead they potentially threaten our ability to secure the data we store on our servers?WHY WAS THIS NOT EXPLAINED IN THE TECHNICAL CHANGE HISTORY?The SSL option for the [TCPConnect] context was added to the software in version 4.5.0b1 more than 13 months ago on 3/21/2002 ... is this when it was secretly added? -- Sincerely, Kenneth Grome ------------------------------------------------------------- My programmers will write WebDNA code for you at $27 an hour! -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: Pirated WebCat? NOT... (Bonkers 2003)
  2. Re: Pirated WebCat? NOT... (Dan Strong 2003)
  3. Re: Pirated WebCat? NOT... (marc@kaiwi.com (Marc Kaiwi) 2003)
  4. Re: Pirated WebCat? NOT... (Doug Deck 2003)
  5. Re: Pirated WebCat? NOT... (Phillip Bonesteele 2003)
  6. Re: Pirated WebCat? NOT... (marc@kaiwi.com (Marc Kaiwi) 2003)
  7. Re: Pirated WebCat? NOT... (Phillip Bonesteele 2003)
  8. Re: Pirated WebCat? NOT... (Jeff Logan 2003)
  9. Re: Pirated WebCat? NOT... (Jay Van Vark 2003)
  10. Re: Pirated WebCat? NOT... (Kimberly D. Walls 2003)
  11. Re: Pirated WebCat? NOT... (Karl Schroll 2003)
  12. Re: Pirated WebCat? NOT... (Phillip Bonesteele 2003)
  13. Re: Pirated WebCat? NOT... (Joe D'Andrea 2003)
  14. Re: Pirated WebCat? NOT... (Doug Deck 2003)
  15. Re: Pirated WebCat? NOT... (Donovan 2003)
  16. Re: Pirated WebCat? NOT... (Kenneth Grome 2003)
  17. Re: Pirated WebCat? NOT... (Kenneth Grome 2003)
  18. Re: Pirated WebCat? NOT... (marc@kaiwi.com (Marc Kaiwi) 2003)
  19. Re: Pirated WebCat? NOT... (Nitai @ ComputerOil 2003)
  20. Re: Pirated WebCat? NOT... (Pat Holliday 2003)
  21. Re: Pirated WebCat? NOT... (Claude Gelinas 2003)
  22. Re: Pirated WebCat? NOT... (Daniel Schutzsmith 2003)
  23. Re: Pirated WebCat? NOT... (Bob Minor 2003)
  24. Re: Pirated WebCat? NOT... (Nitai @ ComputerOil 2003)
  25. Re: Pirated WebCat? NOT... (Kenneth Grome 2003)
  26. Re: Pirated WebCat? NOT... (Kenneth Grome 2003)
  27. Re: Pirated WebCat? NOT... (Nitai @ ComputerOil 2003)
  28. Re: Pirated WebCat? NOT... (Rene van der Velde 2003)
  29. Re: Pirated WebCat? NOT... (Kenneth Grome 2003)
  30. Pirated WebCat? NOT... (Rob Blair 2003)
>The issue is simple: when we buy your software, it's ours > >I was under the impression that we never 'own' software: the company >sell a licence to use a copy - hence, 'licence'. The difference is immaterial in this situation. Whether it is actually owned by us or licensed to us by the company, the issue still stands that this can be considered a possible invasion of privacy and a potentially huge security threat that we were never properly informed of.And whatever happened to the responsibility of the company to INFORM us of bizarre new features of the software, especially when the new features add NOTHING to our functional use of the software, but instead they potentially threaten our ability to secure the data we store on our servers?WHY WAS THIS NOT EXPLAINED IN THE Technical Change History?The SSL option for the [tcpconnect] context was added to the software in version 4.5.0b1 more than 13 months ago on 3/21/2002 ... is this when it was secretly added? -- Sincerely, Kenneth Grome ------------------------------------------------------------- My programmers will write WebDNA code for you at $27 an hour! -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ Kenneth Grome

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

Emailer problems. (1998) Using the new syntax/scoping methods (2000) ShowIf, If, XML Syntax.... (2004) Strange sort in search... (2000) Looking up two prices in database? (1997) [WebDNA] WA,WO or how to find products with multiple selects .... (2018) Generating Report Totals (1997) [WebDNA] Problem with Sendmail (2012) Looking for 5 to 12 shops with 3 URLs & statements (1997) Re:Call For Entry: Third Annual Business on The Internet (BOTI) Awards (1999) WebCat 3? (2000) Duplicate Items in the Cart (1998) Quit revisited (1997) Show if time tags (1997) Online reference (1997) WebCat2: multiple currency support (1997) Web Catalog 2 demo (1997) listfiles-looking for slick solution (1997) [Fwd: Rotating Banners ... (was LinkExchange)] (1997) merchant accts. (1997)