Re: slightly OT: advertising schemes
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 2004
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 56678
interpreted = N
texte = > I think the major criticisms are that there is very weak reporting from google (you can't tell what pages or even domains do well or poorly) Yes, that *is* AdSense's major disadvantage. ------------------------ I should clarify, that is a problem with google's reports. There are certainly scripts that one can use to monitor activity on a page basis. I'm happy to share with anyone who'd like to see it, but it's copied from webmasterworld with implied permission. In any event, Google has promised better reports for months. ------------------------ > and they still pay by check. That said, it's certainly worth a try (there's no sign up fee, although, why would there be?) and google does pay in a fairly timely manner. Yes, very reliable. You should be aware that their slow to pay though. Payment for one month is sent at the end of the *next* month. ------------------------ I should also say that I understand that Google's payments are a far cry better from what other ad networks were/are doing. ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list
. To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
> I think the major criticisms are that there is very weak reporting from google (you can't tell what pages or even domains do well or poorly) Yes, that *is* AdSense's major disadvantage. ------------------------ I should clarify, that is a problem with google's reports. There are certainly scripts that one can use to monitor activity on a page basis. I'm happy to share with anyone who'd like to see it, but it's copied from webmasterworld with implied permission. In any event, Google has promised better reports for months. ------------------------ > and they still pay by check. That said, it's certainly worth a try (there's no sign up fee, although, why would there be?) and google does pay in a fairly timely manner. Yes, very reliable. You should be aware that their slow to pay though. Payment for one month is sent at the end of the *next* month. ------------------------ I should also say that I understand that Google's payments are a far cry better from what other ad networks were/are doing. ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/
devaulw@onebox.com
DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!
Top Articles:
Talk List
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...
Related Readings:
PIXO (1997)
Add (1998)
WebCat2 - Getting to the browser's username/password data (1997)
[shell] (2002)
TeaRoom (1997)
question: Eudora 3.1.1 (1997)
Bug? (1997)
Error Template (1999)
Color options for items (1999)
Almost a there but..bye bye NetCloak (1997)
Using Applescript to process WebCatalog functions (1998)
updating with ProductEditor (1998)
select multiple 2 more cents (1997)
Write to the desktop? (2002)
[WebDNA] WebDNA Hosting (2008)
JS version of this (2007)
Faxing orders in place of email (1997)
WebCat2.0 acgi vs plugin (1997)
Replace context (1998)
orderfile and setlineitems (1998)