Re: WebDNA dying or ... ?
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 2005
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 62452
interpreted = N
texte = Kenneth Grome wrote: > > Yet no matter what they did, it would never compensate for the fact that > all the time they invested in learning and promoting the software would > eventually be a total loss. Unsupported software and software that's at > the end of its life with no future development is always a losing > proposition ... :( Well, before we officially declare WebDNA for dead we ought to see what Smith Micro has to say about it of course. ;-) And even if they decide to end their involvment, I'm sure they'd allow somebody else to take over support and development. If WebDNA is worth it, that is. Personally I believe it has at least one huge advantage over other cgi languages/programs: it's quite easy even for a rather inexperienced computer user to put together functional and useful scripts. I may be wrong though. I don't really know all the competitors. Frank Nordberg http://www.musicaviva.com ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list
. To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
Kenneth Grome wrote: > > Yet no matter what they did, it would never compensate for the fact that > all the time they invested in learning and promoting the software would > eventually be a total loss. Unsupported software and software that's at > the end of its life with no future development is always a losing > proposition ... :( Well, before we officially declare WebDNA for dead we ought to see what Smith Micro has to say about it of course. ;-) And even if they decide to end their involvment, I'm sure they'd allow somebody else to take over support and development. If WebDNA is worth it, that is. Personally I believe it has at least one huge advantage over other cgi languages/programs: it's quite easy even for a rather inexperienced computer user to put together functional and useful scripts. I may be wrong though. I don't really know all the competitors. Frank Nordberg http://www.musicaviva.com ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/
Frank Nordberg
DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!
Top Articles:
Talk List
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...
Related Readings:
ANYONE (1999)
interesting (2003)
More on the email templates (1997)
quitting (1997)
[HIDEIF] inside [FOUNDITEM] (1997)
SiteGuard Admin Feature ? (1997)
[searchString] (1997)
How to get shownext to just shownext once (1997)
RE: Webcat 2.0.1b1 bug with IE 3.01/4.0p1 (1997)
Separate SSL Server (1997)
RE: [WebDNA] macOS 10.13.3 and WebDNA Mac Server 8.5.1 - hick-up (2019)
Prices coming up 0.00 (2001)
webmerch and serials - almost there (1997)
WebCat2 Append problem (B14Macacgi) (1997)
WebDNA 4.5 upgrade? (2002)
forming a SKU (1999)
Forcing a NEWCART (1997)
Taxable Shipping (2003)
Question about replacing words (1998)
WebCat B13 Mac CGI -- Frames question (1997)