Re: WebDNA dying or ... ?
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 2005
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 62453
interpreted = N
texte = Has anybody notified Pacific Coast Software? Maybe they'd want to buy it back. :-) At 12:43 PM 7/6/2005, you wrote: >Kenneth Grome wrote: >>Yet no matter what they did, it would never compensate for the fact that all the time they invested in learning and promoting the software would eventually be a total loss. Unsupported software and software that's at the end of its life with no future development is always a losing proposition ... :( > >Well, before we officially declare WebDNA for dead we ought to see what Smith Micro has to say about it of course. ;-) > >And even if they decide to end their involvment, I'm sure they'd allow somebody else to take over support and development. >If WebDNA is worth it, that is. Personally I believe it has at least one huge advantage over other cgi languages/programs: it's quite easy even for a rather inexperienced computer user to put together functional and useful scripts. I may be wrong though. I don't really know all the competitors. > > >Frank Nordberg >http://www.musicaviva.com ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list
. To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
Has anybody notified Pacific Coast Software? Maybe they'd want to buy it back. :-) At 12:43 PM 7/6/2005, you wrote: >Kenneth Grome wrote: >>Yet no matter what they did, it would never compensate for the fact that all the time they invested in learning and promoting the software would eventually be a total loss. Unsupported software and software that's at the end of its life with no future development is always a losing proposition ... :( > >Well, before we officially declare WebDNA for dead we ought to see what Smith Micro has to say about it of course. ;-) > >And even if they decide to end their involvment, I'm sure they'd allow somebody else to take over support and development. >If WebDNA is worth it, that is. Personally I believe it has at least one huge advantage over other cgi languages/programs: it's quite easy even for a rather inexperienced computer user to put together functional and useful scripts. I may be wrong though. I don't really know all the competitors. > > >Frank Nordberg >http://www.musicaviva.com ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/
Gary Krockover
DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!
Top Articles:
Talk List
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...
Related Readings:
politeness (was searches with dash...) Please Read (2000)
WebDNA Solutions ... sorry! (1997)
PIXO Support (1997)
PayPal (was WebCatalog Help) (2002)
Quit revisited (1997)
getting images' width/height (1998)
Version number missing (was Mondo amounts of Mail [long]) (1999)
setting line item numbers (1998)
[WebDNA] Two stores one db (2011)
Updated EditPlus Tags (2004)
https bs (2004)
Checkboxes (1998)
WebCatalog/Mac 2.1b2 New Features (1997)
RE: Signal Raised (1997)
slightly OT: advertising schemes (2004)
Ampersand (1997)
creator code (1997)
I'm new be kind (1997)
off topic - dna snipets (1997)
WebCatalog can't find database (1997)