Re: [table] retained in memory

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2006

It keeps the original formatting. numero = 67680
interpreted = N
texte = Hey Tom - I would like to say that the bug is widespread, but can't. After careful thought, I have come to the conclusion that perhaps the [table] context isn't buggy, I don't know for sure - for us IT IS, but for anyone else I can't say. I have heard others use it fine.The reason I was upset is because when something like this happens, there is no-one to contact to gain assistance or confirmation. For that I apologize to those on the list for my comments. However, I can't help but blame SM for allowing things to reach their boiling point. If they would answer their phone, respond to emails, or participate on this list, simple errors or assumptions could be avoided.-AdamTom Duke wrote:> Hi all,>> I'm starting to use tables a lot to load preferences in for pages - is> this a bug for everyone or is Adam's problem particular to his setup ?> We are on OSX running WebDNA 6.0>> Thanks> - Tom>> -------------------------------------------------------------> This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to> the mailing list .> To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to > Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/> -------------------------------------------------------------This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list .To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

Re: [table] retained in memory ( Adam O'Connor 2006)
Re: [table] retained in memory ( Terry Wilson 2006)
Re: [table] retained in memory ( Adam O'Connor 2006)
Re: [table] retained in memory ( Terry Wilson 2006)
Re: [table] retained in memory ( Terry Wilson 2006)
Re: [table] retained in memory ( "Bess Ho" 2006)
Re: [table] retained in memory ( Adam O'Connor 2006)
Re: [table] retained in memory ( "Bess Ho" 2006)
Re: [table] retained in memory ( "Brian B. Burton" 2006)
Re: [table] retained in memory ( Donovan Brooke 2006)
Re: [table] retained in memory ( Pat Holliday 2006)
Re: [table] retained in memory ( Adam O'Connor 2006)
Re: [table] retained in memory ( "Tom Duke" 2006)
Re: [table] retained in memory ( Stuart Tremain 2006)
Re: [table] retained in memory ( "Bess Ho" 2006)
[table] retained in memory ( Adam O'Connor 2006)

Hey Tom - I would like to say that the bug is widespread, but can't. After careful thought, I have come to the conclusion that perhaps the [table] context isn't buggy, I don't know for sure - for us IT IS, but for anyone else I can't say. I have heard others use it fine.The reason I was upset is because when something like this happens, there is no-one to contact to gain assistance or confirmation. For that I apologize to those on the list for my comments. However, I can't help but blame SM for allowing things to reach their boiling point. If they would answer their phone, respond to emails, or participate on this list, simple errors or assumptions could be avoided.-AdamTom Duke wrote:> Hi all,>> I'm starting to use tables a lot to load preferences in for pages - is> this a bug for everyone or is Adam's problem particular to his setup ?> We are on OSX running WebDNA 6.0>> Thanks> - Tom>> -------------------------------------------------------------> This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to> the mailing list .> To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to > Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/> -------------------------------------------------------------This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list .To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ Adam O'Connor

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Re: [table] retained in memory

2006

Top Articles:

Related Readings: