[table] retained in memory

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2006

It keeps the original formatting. numero = 67653
interpreted = N
texte = Not sure if anyone has discovered this but my colleagues and I have discovered that [table] data does not get released from system/server memory. We have suspected this before due to system crashes in relation to using large temp [table] tables, but now are convinced that this context is bad.Here's the scoop, we placed a simple [table] on a main site page, containing three records - simple enough. After doing so our server's available memory would accumulate throughout the day till the point where it would crash. Did this every day last week, we couldn't figure out why our memory was not getting released. We replaced the [table] with an equivalent *.db and so far our memory has been stable - thus the problem is fixed.Forewarning, be very cautious about using this context, and thanks Smith Micro for ruining my vacation. Also, thanks for not returning my phone calls last week - freaking pricks, I'd love to shove my fist into your bass mouth.-Adam-------------------------------------------------------------This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list .To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

Re: [table] retained in memory ( Adam O'Connor 2006)
Re: [table] retained in memory ( Terry Wilson 2006)
Re: [table] retained in memory ( Adam O'Connor 2006)
Re: [table] retained in memory ( Terry Wilson 2006)
Re: [table] retained in memory ( Terry Wilson 2006)
Re: [table] retained in memory ( "Bess Ho" 2006)
Re: [table] retained in memory ( Adam O'Connor 2006)
Re: [table] retained in memory ( "Bess Ho" 2006)
Re: [table] retained in memory ( "Brian B. Burton" 2006)
Re: [table] retained in memory ( Donovan Brooke 2006)
Re: [table] retained in memory ( Pat Holliday 2006)
Re: [table] retained in memory ( Adam O'Connor 2006)
Re: [table] retained in memory ( "Tom Duke" 2006)
Re: [table] retained in memory ( Stuart Tremain 2006)
Re: [table] retained in memory ( "Bess Ho" 2006)
[table] retained in memory ( Adam O'Connor 2006)

Not sure if anyone has discovered this but my colleagues and I have discovered that [table] data does not get released from system/server memory. We have suspected this before due to system crashes in relation to using large temp [table] tables, but now are convinced that this context is bad.Here's the scoop, we placed a simple [table] on a main site page, containing three records - simple enough. After doing so our server's available memory would accumulate throughout the day till the point where it would crash. Did this every day last week, we couldn't figure out why our memory was not getting released. We replaced the [table] with an equivalent *.db and so far our memory has been stable - thus the problem is fixed.Forewarning, be very cautious about using this context, and thanks Smith Micro for ruining my vacation. Also, thanks for not returning my phone calls last week - freaking pricks, I'd love to shove my fist into your bass mouth.-Adam-------------------------------------------------------------This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list .To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ Adam O'Connor

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

[table] retained in memory

2006

Top Articles:

Related Readings: