Re: [table] retained in memory

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2006

It keeps the original formatting. numero = 67687
interpreted = N
texte = Then it must be your block of code that cause that problem - memory =leak. You can rewrite the code or trouble shoot block of code line by =line.-----Original Message-----From: WebDNA Talk [mailto:WebDNA-Talk@talk.smithmicro.com]On Behalf OfAdam O'ConnorSent: Thursday, July 06, 2006 11:52 AMTo: WebDNA TalkSubject: Re: [table] retained in memoryHehe - I'll have to try it. Yeah as much as I would like to blame SM=20after reading the posts it must be our setup. Its just strange that=20that context causes us problems. Take that block of code out and=20everything is fine, put it in and things go haywire. Oh well, time to=20move on.adamBess Ho wrote:> Hey Adam,>> This is what I usually do. I will keep calling the company everyday =until I get an answer. If they don't response, I'll call the police up =and ask if they are dead or kidnapped.>> I never heard of a company open for business and refuse to pick up a =paid customer's call or support call.>> -----Original Message-----> From: WebDNA Talk [mailto:WebDNA-Talk@talk.smithmicro.com]On Behalf Of> Adam O'Connor> Sent: Thursday, July 06, 2006 8:28 AM> To: WebDNA Talk> Subject: Re: [table] retained in memory>>> Hey Tom - I would like to say that the bug is widespread, but can't. =20> After careful thought, I have come to the conclusion that perhaps the=20> [table] context isn't buggy, I don't know for sure - for us IT IS, but => for anyone else I can't say. I have heard others use it fine.>> The reason I was upset is because when something like this happens,=20> there is no-one to contact to gain assistance or confirmation. For =that=20> I apologize to those on the list for my comments. However, I can't =help=20> but blame SM for allowing things to reach their boiling point. If =they=20> would answer their phone, respond to emails, or participate on this=20> list, simple errors or assumptions could be avoided.>> -Adam>> Tom Duke wrote:> =20>> Hi all,>>>> I'm starting to use tables a lot to load preferences in for pages - =is>> this a bug for everyone or is Adam's problem particular to his setup =?>> We are on OSX running WebDNA 6.0>>>> Thanks>> - Tom>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------->> This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to>> the mailing list .>> To unsubscribe, E-mail to: >> To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to =>> Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/>> =20>> =20>>> -------------------------------------------------------------> This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to> the mailing list .> To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to => Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/>> -------------------------------------------------------------> This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to> the mailing list .> To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to => Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/> =20-------------------------------------------------------------This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list .To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to =Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/-------------------------------------------------------------This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list .To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

Re: [table] retained in memory ( Adam O'Connor 2006)
Re: [table] retained in memory ( Terry Wilson 2006)
Re: [table] retained in memory ( Adam O'Connor 2006)
Re: [table] retained in memory ( Terry Wilson 2006)
Re: [table] retained in memory ( Terry Wilson 2006)
Re: [table] retained in memory ( "Bess Ho" 2006)
Re: [table] retained in memory ( Adam O'Connor 2006)
Re: [table] retained in memory ( "Bess Ho" 2006)
Re: [table] retained in memory ( "Brian B. Burton" 2006)
Re: [table] retained in memory ( Donovan Brooke 2006)
Re: [table] retained in memory ( Pat Holliday 2006)
Re: [table] retained in memory ( Adam O'Connor 2006)
Re: [table] retained in memory ( "Tom Duke" 2006)
Re: [table] retained in memory ( Stuart Tremain 2006)
Re: [table] retained in memory ( "Bess Ho" 2006)
[table] retained in memory ( Adam O'Connor 2006)

Then it must be your block of code that cause that problem - memory =leak. You can rewrite the code or trouble shoot block of code line by =line.-----Original Message-----From: WebDNA Talk [mailto:WebDNA-Talk@talk.smithmicro.com]On Behalf OfAdam O'ConnorSent: Thursday, July 06, 2006 11:52 AMTo: WebDNA TalkSubject: Re: [table] retained in memoryHehe - I'll have to try it. Yeah as much as I would like to blame SM=20after reading the posts it must be our setup. Its just strange that=20that context causes us problems. Take that block of code out and=20everything is fine, put it in and things go haywire. Oh well, time to=20move on.adamBess Ho wrote:> Hey Adam,>> This is what I usually do. I will keep calling the company everyday =until I get an answer. If they don't response, I'll call the police up =and ask if they are dead or kidnapped.>> I never heard of a company open for business and refuse to pick up a =paid customer's call or support call.>> -----Original Message-----> From: WebDNA Talk [mailto:WebDNA-Talk@talk.smithmicro.com]On Behalf Of> Adam O'Connor> Sent: Thursday, July 06, 2006 8:28 AM> To: WebDNA Talk> Subject: Re: [table] retained in memory>>> Hey Tom - I would like to say that the bug is widespread, but can't. =20> After careful thought, I have come to the conclusion that perhaps the=20> [table] context isn't buggy, I don't know for sure - for us IT IS, but => for anyone else I can't say. I have heard others use it fine.>> The reason I was upset is because when something like this happens,=20> there is no-one to contact to gain assistance or confirmation. For =that=20> I apologize to those on the list for my comments. However, I can't =help=20> but blame SM for allowing things to reach their boiling point. If =they=20> would answer their phone, respond to emails, or participate on this=20> list, simple errors or assumptions could be avoided.>> -Adam>> Tom Duke wrote:> =20>> Hi all,>>>> I'm starting to use tables a lot to load preferences in for pages - =is>> this a bug for everyone or is Adam's problem particular to his setup =?>> We are on OSX running WebDNA 6.0>>>> Thanks>> - Tom>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------->> This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to>> the mailing list .>> To unsubscribe, E-mail to: >> To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to =>> Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/>> =20>> =20>>> -------------------------------------------------------------> This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to> the mailing list .> To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to => Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/>> -------------------------------------------------------------> This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to> the mailing list .> To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to => Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/> =20-------------------------------------------------------------This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list .To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to =Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/-------------------------------------------------------------This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list .To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ "Bess Ho"

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Re: [table] retained in memory

2006

Top Articles:

Related Readings: