Re: [table] retained in memory

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2006


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 67669
interpreted = N
texte = Adam Just a thought, do you have WebDNA set up to cache templates ? Stuart Tremain idfk web developments, sydney, australia On 06 Jul 2006, at 1:44 AM, Adam O'Connor wrote: > Not sure if anyone has discovered this but my colleagues and I have > discovered that [table] data does not get released from system/ > server memory. We have suspected this before due to system crashes > in relation to using large temp [table] tables, but now are > convinced that this context is bad. > > Here's the scoop, we placed a simple [table] on a main site page, > containing three records - simple enough. After doing so our > server's available memory would accumulate throughout the day till > the point where it would crash. Did this every day last week, we > couldn't figure out why our memory was not getting released. We > replaced the [table] with an equivalent *.db and so far our memory > has been stable - thus the problem is fixed. > > Forewarning, be very cautious about using this context, and thanks > Smith Micro for ruining my vacation. Also, thanks for not returning > my phone calls last week - freaking pricks, I'd love to shove my > fist into your bass mouth. > > -Adam > > ------------------------------------------------------------- > This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to > the mailing list . > To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to digest@talk.smithmicro.com> > Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: [table] retained in memory ( Adam O'Connor 2006)
  2. Re: [table] retained in memory ( Terry Wilson 2006)
  3. Re: [table] retained in memory ( Adam O'Connor 2006)
  4. Re: [table] retained in memory ( Terry Wilson 2006)
  5. Re: [table] retained in memory ( Terry Wilson 2006)
  6. Re: [table] retained in memory ( "Bess Ho" 2006)
  7. Re: [table] retained in memory ( Adam O'Connor 2006)
  8. Re: [table] retained in memory ( "Bess Ho" 2006)
  9. Re: [table] retained in memory ( "Brian B. Burton" 2006)
  10. Re: [table] retained in memory ( Donovan Brooke 2006)
  11. Re: [table] retained in memory ( Pat Holliday 2006)
  12. Re: [table] retained in memory ( Adam O'Connor 2006)
  13. Re: [table] retained in memory ( "Tom Duke" 2006)
  14. Re: [table] retained in memory ( Stuart Tremain 2006)
  15. Re: [table] retained in memory ( "Bess Ho" 2006)
  16. [table] retained in memory ( Adam O'Connor 2006)
Adam Just a thought, do you have WebDNA set up to cache templates ? Stuart Tremain idfk web developments, sydney, australia On 06 Jul 2006, at 1:44 AM, Adam O'Connor wrote: > Not sure if anyone has discovered this but my colleagues and I have > discovered that [table] data does not get released from system/ > server memory. We have suspected this before due to system crashes > in relation to using large temp [table] tables, but now are > convinced that this context is bad. > > Here's the scoop, we placed a simple [table] on a main site page, > containing three records - simple enough. After doing so our > server's available memory would accumulate throughout the day till > the point where it would crash. Did this every day last week, we > couldn't figure out why our memory was not getting released. We > replaced the [table] with an equivalent *.db and so far our memory > has been stable - thus the problem is fixed. > > Forewarning, be very cautious about using this context, and thanks > Smith Micro for ruining my vacation. Also, thanks for not returning > my phone calls last week - freaking pricks, I'd love to shove my > fist into your bass mouth. > > -Adam > > ------------------------------------------------------------- > This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to > the mailing list . > To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to digest@talk.smithmicro.com> > Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ Stuart Tremain

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

Help! WebCat2 bug (1997) WebCat2 Append problem (B14Macacgi) (1997) Set Header Context (1998) Funny Chars (1999) Cart Number Propagation (1997) WebTV problems with WebCatalog?? (1998) Passing WebCat data to SSL server (1997) [taxRate] [TaxTotal] ? (1997) WebCatalog vs. Cold Fusion (1998) Wrapping text (1998) WebCat2 several catalogs? (1997) WebCatalog 4.0 is now available (2000) Firewalls - What's Good? (1999) [ot] Raid Cards for RH ES (2004) Associative lookup style? + bit more (1997) Country & Ship-to address & other fields ? (1997) OT: CT Scan might have saved my life!! (2006) Dynamic PDFs? (2004) Timeout question .. (2003) [founditems] & radiobuttons - CONCLUSION (2002)