Re: [WebDNA] DNA suffix
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 2008
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 100832
interpreted = N
texte = That is very kind of you, and will surely help a lot! thank you Matthew! - chris On Sep 18, 2008, at 11:37, Psi Prime, Matthew A Perosi wrote: > Here's some help I'll offer. At the footer of all my websites I > have my company name and a link to my company website. I'll start > adding a link next to it saying "powered by webdna" and link to > webdna.us. Many of my sites are Google PR3 to PR5, so that link > juice should pass along some good credibility. > > BTW I have 261 WebDNA sites and counting, I'll get them all linked > over time. > > Matthew A Perosi | > Psi Prime, Inc. | > http://www.psiprime.com | > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psi_Prime%2C_Inc | > 323 Union Blvd. | > Totowa, NJ 07512 | > P: 973.413.8210 | > F: 973.413.8217 | > > > > Christophe Billiottet wrote: >> Sure! this is the case for everybody, so in no case shall we modify >> the existing suffixes. But from now on, it would be nice to start >> using the .dna suffix... any help in any way is more than welcome, >> we are building something big! ;-) >> >> - chris >> >> On Sep 18, 2008, at 11:00, PLANET DJ (Chris W.) wrote: >> >>> I agree with all that was said, EXCEPT... I certainly don't want >>> to lose my Google Page Rank and SEO just because the software >>> platform wants to change extensions. I would gladly code new sites >>> using .dna, but the existing ones need to stay as .tpl. >>> >>> Best Regards, >>> >>> Chris Whybrew >>> Senior Account Manager >>> >>> >>> PLANET DJ INC >>> www.planetdj.com >>> >>> p: 775.323.1540 ext 3903 >>> f: 775.323.8230 >>> e: chrisw@planetdj.com >>> >>> >>> From: "JD Ready"
>>> Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2008 10:32 AM >>> To: talk@webdna.us >>> Subject: Re: [WebDNA] DNA suffix >>> >>> Well, for my 2 cents, I'm new to WebDNA, but I have to agree with >>> Christophe. I have programmed in asp, aspx & php and I like seeing >>> the common extension of the language I coded in if for no other >>> reason to know at a glance what I wrote the site in after not >>> working on it for a couple of years. >>> >>> Additionally, I like knowing what other sites have been written in >>> in the event I think something's "cool" and I want to know how the >>> programmer did it. >>> >>> And finally, the Christophe's point, if you guys are to "resurect" >>> webDNA and have it rise like a pheonix from the ashes (a quote >>> from someone's earlier post), then I think you want as much brand >>> recognition as you can get. I know that when I see a website that >>> @ know is dynamic but is using an extension that I don't >>> recognize, I often look it up to see what it is. >>> >>> And finally, about using .html. I would not recommend that. We all >>> have control over our servers it would appear. However, in a >>> shared hosting environment you often don't. If WebDNA ever gets >>> widely adopted, the hosting companies are not going to map .html >>> to webDNA - just like they don't do it for asp or php. Also, as a >>> programmer, I expect .htm or .html files to be pure html and would >>> think it odd and possibly even incorrect (regardless of whether >>> its possible) to have webdna script in a file designated as html. >>> >>> Anyway, that my 2 cents having been involved with webDNA for the >>> past 5 days. :) >>> >>> ----------------------- >>> Sent from my Treo(r) smartphone >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Christophe Billiottet >>> Date: Wednesday, Sep 17, 2008 10:50 am >>> Subject: Re: [WebDNA] DNA suffix >>> To: Reply-To: >>> >>> Well, this was just that WebDNA, as a web scripting language, is far >>> far behind the others in terms of number of active servers and >>> sites. >>> If you check a php site, there is nothing different between it and >>> any >>> other html site, except for the .php suffix that makes it >>> immediately >>> identifiable: "ah! this is another php site" ;-) >>> PHP too can use any other suffix (just a matter of mapping it) but >>> the >>> default suffix is .php and it seems everybody is satisfied with it. >>> Same with .asp >>> >>> The suffix identifies a technology, and we, WebDNA users, decided to >>> hide our technology. >>> >>> I guess this is not a very good idea if we want to make WebDNA a >>> winner product... >>> >>> chris >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Sep 17, 2008, at 12:58, Tom Duke wrote: >>> >>> > Hi, >>> >>> > Have to say that I agree with Dan. >>> >>> > I would certainly support setting .dna as the default suffix - >>> but I >>> like the fact that my sites are not clearly identified with any >>> technology. I also hide the bit with >>> WebDNA comments so there should be no easy way for a user to >>> determine the server side scripting language used. >>> >>> > I would think this would be considered good security practice. >>> >>> > - Tom >>> >>> > >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------- >>> This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to >>> the mailing list . >>> To unsubscribe, E-mail to: >>> archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us >>> old archives: http://dev.webdna.us/TalkListArchive/ >>> >>> >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------- >>> This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to >>> the mailing list . >>> To unsubscribe, E-mail to: >>> archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us >>> old archives: http://dev.webdna.us/TalkListArchive/ >>> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------- >> This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to >> the mailing list . >> To unsubscribe, E-mail to: >> archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us >> old archives: http://dev.webdna.us/TalkListArchive/ >> >> > --------------------------------------------------------- > This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to > the mailing list . > To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us > old archives: http://dev.webdna.us/TalkListArchive/
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
That is very kind of you, and will surely help a lot! thank you Matthew! - chris On Sep 18, 2008, at 11:37, Psi Prime, Matthew A Perosi wrote: > Here's some help I'll offer. At the footer of all my websites I > have my company name and a link to my company website. I'll start > adding a link next to it saying "powered by webdna" and link to > webdna.us. Many of my sites are Google PR3 to PR5, so that link > juice should pass along some good credibility. > > BTW I have 261 WebDNA sites and counting, I'll get them all linked > over time. > > Matthew A Perosi | > Psi Prime, Inc. | > http://www.psiprime.com | > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psi_Prime%2C_Inc | > 323 Union Blvd. | > Totowa, NJ 07512 | > P: 973.413.8210 | > F: 973.413.8217 | > > > > Christophe Billiottet wrote: >> Sure! this is the case for everybody, so in no case shall we modify >> the existing suffixes. But from now on, it would be nice to start >> using the .dna suffix... any help in any way is more than welcome, >> we are building something big! ;-) >> >> - chris >> >> On Sep 18, 2008, at 11:00, PLANET DJ (Chris W.) wrote: >> >>> I agree with all that was said, EXCEPT... I certainly don't want >>> to lose my Google Page Rank and SEO just because the software >>> platform wants to change extensions. I would gladly code new sites >>> using .dna, but the existing ones need to stay as .tpl. >>> >>> Best Regards, >>> >>> Chris Whybrew >>> Senior Account Manager >>> >>> >>> PLANET DJ INC >>> www.planetdj.com >>> >>> p: 775.323.1540 ext 3903 >>> f: 775.323.8230 >>> e: chrisw@planetdj.com >>> >>> >>> From: "JD Ready" >>> Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2008 10:32 AM >>> To: talk@webdna.us >>> Subject: Re: [WebDNA] DNA suffix >>> >>> Well, for my 2 cents, I'm new to WebDNA, but I have to agree with >>> Christophe. I have programmed in asp, aspx & php and I like seeing >>> the common extension of the language I coded in if for no other >>> reason to know at a glance what I wrote the site in after not >>> working on it for a couple of years. >>> >>> Additionally, I like knowing what other sites have been written in >>> in the event I think something's "cool" and I want to know how the >>> programmer did it. >>> >>> And finally, the Christophe's point, if you guys are to "resurect" >>> webDNA and have it rise like a pheonix from the ashes (a quote >>> from someone's earlier post), then I think you want as much brand >>> recognition as you can get. I know that when I see a website that >>> @ know is dynamic but is using an extension that I don't >>> recognize, I often look it up to see what it is. >>> >>> And finally, about using .html. I would not recommend that. We all >>> have control over our servers it would appear. However, in a >>> shared hosting environment you often don't. If WebDNA ever gets >>> widely adopted, the hosting companies are not going to map .html >>> to webDNA - just like they don't do it for asp or php. Also, as a >>> programmer, I expect .htm or .html files to be pure html and would >>> think it odd and possibly even incorrect (regardless of whether >>> its possible) to have webdna script in a file designated as html. >>> >>> Anyway, that my 2 cents having been involved with webDNA for the >>> past 5 days. :) >>> >>> ----------------------- >>> Sent from my Treo(r) smartphone >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Christophe Billiottet >>> Date: Wednesday, Sep 17, 2008 10:50 am >>> Subject: Re: [WebDNA] DNA suffix >>> To: Reply-To: >>> >>> Well, this was just that WebDNA, as a web scripting language, is far >>> far behind the others in terms of number of active servers and >>> sites. >>> If you check a php site, there is nothing different between it and >>> any >>> other html site, except for the .php suffix that makes it >>> immediately >>> identifiable: "ah! this is another php site" ;-) >>> PHP too can use any other suffix (just a matter of mapping it) but >>> the >>> default suffix is .php and it seems everybody is satisfied with it. >>> Same with .asp >>> >>> The suffix identifies a technology, and we, WebDNA users, decided to >>> hide our technology. >>> >>> I guess this is not a very good idea if we want to make WebDNA a >>> winner product... >>> >>> chris >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Sep 17, 2008, at 12:58, Tom Duke wrote: >>> >>> > Hi, >>> >>> > Have to say that I agree with Dan. >>> >>> > I would certainly support setting .dna as the default suffix - >>> but I >>> like the fact that my sites are not clearly identified with any >>> technology. I also hide the bit with >>> WebDNA comments so there should be no easy way for a user to >>> determine the server side scripting language used. >>> >>> > I would think this would be considered good security practice. >>> >>> > - Tom >>> >>> > >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------- >>> This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to >>> the mailing list . >>> To unsubscribe, E-mail to: >>> archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us >>> old archives: http://dev.webdna.us/TalkListArchive/ >>> >>> >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------- >>> This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to >>> the mailing list . >>> To unsubscribe, E-mail to: >>> archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us >>> old archives: http://dev.webdna.us/TalkListArchive/ >>> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------- >> This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to >> the mailing list . >> To unsubscribe, E-mail to: >> archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us >> old archives: http://dev.webdna.us/TalkListArchive/ >> >> > --------------------------------------------------------- > This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to > the mailing list . > To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us > old archives: http://dev.webdna.us/TalkListArchive/
Christophe Billiottet
DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!
Top Articles:
Talk List
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...
Related Readings:
cart (1997)
Mozilla/4. and Browser Info.txt (1997)
WARNING: MacOS The installer is broken... (2000)
Can I do these? (1997)
oops private message leaked into talk list (1997)
[SearchString] usage (1997)
Multi-User Security on *nix using mod_rewrite (2002)
Help! (1996)
docs for WebCatalog2 (1997)
Hiccup ***** (1998)
WebCat2final1 crashes (1997)
possible, WebCat2.0 and checkboxes-restated (1997)
[WebDNA] Announcing the new features for the next WebDNA version (2015)
PIXO (1997)
Tip of the day.. Sitebuilder Photo feature (2005)
autocommit problem (1998)
Re:UPS, FEDEX TRACKING (1999)
form data submission gets truncated (1997)
limitation found on group searching (1997)
Field name-subcategory (1997)