Re: [WebDNA] DNA suffix
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 2008
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 100805
interpreted = N
texte = While an interesting idea to promote the language, if I generate HTML, I will continue to use .htm or .html. If I generate rss, it's .rss. XML will get .xml. I will also use the right designation in the mime header. I think this keeps sites more web-service ready. I'm happy to throw up a badge in my HTML like other languages/standards do. Bill On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 10:47 AM, Psi Prime, Matthew A Perosi
wrote: > I tend to program using .html only. But I like the idea of the .dna, I'll > jump on that band wagon for you. > > Funny note though, in 1997 I made a proposal to a customer to redesign their > website. I started programming in 1994 and was keeping up with technologies > at the time. The customer showed me his website, which was built in > .tpl.... Until that moment I had never seen a .tpl page before. I'm not > sure if WebDNA was the first to use .tpl, but it certainly was my first > exposure to it... 6 months later I purchased my first WebCatalog v3 license. > > My feeling has always been that other people copied off the WebCatalog itea > of template and .tpl files. > > Matthew A Perosi | > Psi Prime, Inc. | > http://www.psiprime.com | > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psi_Prime%2C_Inc | > 323 Union Blvd. | > Totowa, NJ 07512 | > P: 973.413.8210 | > F: 973.413.8217 | > > > > Christophe Billiottet wrote: >> >> The "Admin page" allows to choose whatever we want: .dna is one of the >> available suffixes, and we can even add more suffixes if we want: this is >> easy to do. It is just that most of us prefer .html or .tpl. Even the >> Administration is built around .tpl... >> The main idea behind this debate is to get your opinion about orienting >> newcomers to .dna suffix, making .dna the "default" suffix for WebDNA. Of >> course, manually adding more suffixes will remain for power users. >> >> - chris >> >> >> On Sep 17, 2008, at 8:24, Michael A. DeLorenzo wrote: >> >>> I believe it used to be that way Christophe. I have a bunch of old code >>> with >>> .dna files from the mid 90's. >>> >>> Michael >>> >>> >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Christophe Billiottet [mailto:christophe.billiottet@webdna.us] >>> Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2008 7:13 AM >>> To: talk@webdna.us >>> Subject: [WebDNA] DNA suffix >>> >>> To launch a debate about small things that have some importance.... i >>> noticed that us, WebDNA developers, were using either .tpl or .html as >>> template suffixes. >>> .tpl is also in use by anybody as generic suffix for "templating", not >>> speaking about .html >>> >>> This means WebDNA pages are "hidden" in the crowd, as if there were a >>> kind of shame showing we are using this great product. >>> >>> I wonder if we couldn't choose .dna (in my opinion the perfect >>> matching suffix for WebDNA) from now on? >>> >>> For instance, it is extremely easy to identify an .asp or .php page, >>> which serves to build assertions like "25 millions sites served with >>> php, 2,800,000,000 php pages indexed by google". But for us... nothing. >>> >>> - chris >>> --------------------------------------------------------- >>> This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to >>> the mailing list . >>> To unsubscribe, E-mail to: >>> archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us >>> old archives: http://dev.webdna.us/TalkListArchive/ >>> >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------- >>> This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to >>> the mailing list . >>> To unsubscribe, E-mail to: >>> archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us >>> old archives: http://dev.webdna.us/TalkListArchive/ >> >> --------------------------------------------------------- >> This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to >> the mailing list . >> To unsubscribe, E-mail to: >> archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us >> old archives: http://dev.webdna.us/TalkListArchive/ >> >> > --------------------------------------------------------- > This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to > the mailing list . > To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us > old archives: http://dev.webdna.us/TalkListArchive/ >
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
While an interesting idea to promote the language, if I generate HTML, I will continue to use .htm or .html. If I generate rss, it's .rss. XML will get .xml. I will also use the right designation in the mime header. I think this keeps sites more web-service ready. I'm happy to throw up a badge in my HTML like other languages/standards do. Bill On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 10:47 AM, Psi Prime, Matthew A Perosi wrote: > I tend to program using .html only. But I like the idea of the .dna, I'll > jump on that band wagon for you. > > Funny note though, in 1997 I made a proposal to a customer to redesign their > website. I started programming in 1994 and was keeping up with technologies > at the time. The customer showed me his website, which was built in > .tpl.... Until that moment I had never seen a .tpl page before. I'm not > sure if WebDNA was the first to use .tpl, but it certainly was my first > exposure to it... 6 months later I purchased my first WebCatalog v3 license. > > My feeling has always been that other people copied off the WebCatalog itea > of template and .tpl files. > > Matthew A Perosi | > Psi Prime, Inc. | > http://www.psiprime.com | > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psi_Prime%2C_Inc | > 323 Union Blvd. | > Totowa, NJ 07512 | > P: 973.413.8210 | > F: 973.413.8217 | > > > > Christophe Billiottet wrote: >> >> The "Admin page" allows to choose whatever we want: .dna is one of the >> available suffixes, and we can even add more suffixes if we want: this is >> easy to do. It is just that most of us prefer .html or .tpl. Even the >> Administration is built around .tpl... >> The main idea behind this debate is to get your opinion about orienting >> newcomers to .dna suffix, making .dna the "default" suffix for WebDNA. Of >> course, manually adding more suffixes will remain for power users. >> >> - chris >> >> >> On Sep 17, 2008, at 8:24, Michael A. DeLorenzo wrote: >> >>> I believe it used to be that way Christophe. I have a bunch of old code >>> with >>> .dna files from the mid 90's. >>> >>> Michael >>> >>> >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Christophe Billiottet [mailto:christophe.billiottet@webdna.us] >>> Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2008 7:13 AM >>> To: talk@webdna.us >>> Subject: [WebDNA] DNA suffix >>> >>> To launch a debate about small things that have some importance.... i >>> noticed that us, WebDNA developers, were using either .tpl or .html as >>> template suffixes. >>> .tpl is also in use by anybody as generic suffix for "templating", not >>> speaking about .html >>> >>> This means WebDNA pages are "hidden" in the crowd, as if there were a >>> kind of shame showing we are using this great product. >>> >>> I wonder if we couldn't choose .dna (in my opinion the perfect >>> matching suffix for WebDNA) from now on? >>> >>> For instance, it is extremely easy to identify an .asp or .php page, >>> which serves to build assertions like "25 millions sites served with >>> php, 2,800,000,000 php pages indexed by google". But for us... nothing. >>> >>> - chris >>> --------------------------------------------------------- >>> This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to >>> the mailing list . >>> To unsubscribe, E-mail to: >>> archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us >>> old archives: http://dev.webdna.us/TalkListArchive/ >>> >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------- >>> This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to >>> the mailing list . >>> To unsubscribe, E-mail to: >>> archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us >>> old archives: http://dev.webdna.us/TalkListArchive/ >> >> --------------------------------------------------------- >> This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to >> the mailing list . >> To unsubscribe, E-mail to: >> archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us >> old archives: http://dev.webdna.us/TalkListArchive/ >> >> > --------------------------------------------------------- > This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to > the mailing list . > To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us > old archives: http://dev.webdna.us/TalkListArchive/ >
"William DeVaul"
DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!
Top Articles:
Talk List
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...
Related Readings:
webdelivery.tmpl???? (1997)
osx or redhat and / or other (2005)
customizing the color of user's pages (1997)
Writefile doesn't work, which permissions to use? (2005)
WCS Newbie question (1997)
OR-searching (2000)
acgi to plugin migration problems (2000)
Emailer errors - repost (2000)
method of payment (1997)
WebDelivery downloads alias, not original ? (1997)
Multiple prices (1997)
ShowNext for method=POST (1997)
Use WebCat to search files in a folder like a search engine? (2001)
I am dumb. No see [variable] (2003)
Users.db (1998)
Random Number Generator works for Ranges of Numbers (1997)
WebCat cannot handle compatible search parameters? (1997)
Re:2nd WebCatalog2 Feature Request (1996)
Looking for a host (1997)
[WebDNA] postfix and dna (2011)