[WebDNA] Use of MySQL with WebDNA

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2010


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 105816
interpreted = N
texte = Good morning everyone! this email is for WebDNA users working with MySQL. We would like to know = how many of you need MySQL support and the reason why you prefer using = MySQL instead of the internal database system. As you know, MySQL now belongs to Oracle with license restrictions and = we were thinking, in case external database support is necessary, if a = better/faster ODBC support woud not be a more universal idea. We also = gave SQLite a thought, but despite its qualities, the internal WebDNA = database system is more powerful. This is not a trivial matter, so we will listen to everyone. thank you! - chris= Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: [WebDNA] Use of MySQL with WebDNA (Stuart Tremain 2010)
  2. RE: [WebDNA] Use of MySQL with WebDNA ("Dale Therio" 2010)
  3. Re: [WebDNA] Use of MySQL with WebDNA (Brian Fries 2010)
  4. Re: [WebDNA] Use of MySQL with WebDNA ("Mr. Robert Minor Jr." 2010)
  5. Re: [WebDNA] Use of MySQL with WebDNA (Kenneth Grome 2010)
  6. RE: [WebDNA] Use of MySQL with WebDNA ("Terry Nair" 2010)
  7. Re: [WebDNA] Use of MySQL with WebDNA (Paul Willis 2010)
  8. Re: [WebDNA] Use of MySQL with WebDNA (christophe.billiottet@webdna.us 2010)
  9. Re: [WebDNA] Use of MySQL with WebDNA (Paul Willis 2010)
  10. Re: [WebDNA] Use of MySQL with WebDNA (christophe.billiottet@webdna.us 2010)
  11. Re: [WebDNA] Use of MySQL with WebDNA (Govinda 2010)
  12. Re: [WebDNA] Use of MySQL with WebDNA (Toby Cox 2010)
  13. RE: [WebDNA] Use of MySQL with WebDNA ("Will Starck" 2010)
  14. Re: [WebDNA] Use of MySQL with WebDNA (Govinda 2010)
  15. Re: [WebDNA] Use of MySQL with WebDNA (Toby Cox 2010)
  16. [WebDNA] Use of MySQL with WebDNA (christophe.billiottet@webdna.us 2010)
Good morning everyone! this email is for WebDNA users working with MySQL. We would like to know = how many of you need MySQL support and the reason why you prefer using = MySQL instead of the internal database system. As you know, MySQL now belongs to Oracle with license restrictions and = we were thinking, in case external database support is necessary, if a = better/faster ODBC support woud not be a more universal idea. We also = gave SQLite a thought, but despite its qualities, the internal WebDNA = database system is more powerful. This is not a trivial matter, so we will listen to everyone. thank you! - chris= christophe.billiottet@webdna.us

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

displaying New products (using [date]) (1997) emailer truncates last letter! (1997) WebCat2 Append problem (B14Macacgi) (1997) Multiple copies (1999) Frames and [cart] (1998) Summary search -- speed (1997) date format (another question) (2000) Use of & in text areas.... (1998) page redirect in webDNA (1997) Caching [include] files ... (1997) AppleScript in WebDNA (2003) Really need a answer (1999) Setting up shop (1997) WebCat2: Items xx to xx shown, etc. (1997) Writing multiple data into one field (1998) 2nd WebCatalog2 Feature Request (1996) linetiems in thankyou.tpl (1997) taxrate - off by 1 cent (1997) HTML encoding in URLs (1997) Sort Order on a page search (1997)