RE: [WebDNA] Use of MySQL with WebDNA
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 2010
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 105833
interpreted = N
texte = It would be nice to have better, native support for mySQL. One of myupcoming projects is to build an interface (prefer to use WebDNA) to adatabase that my mail server uses for user logins. It would be far easier for me to do this in WebDNA than php (have no realdesire or need to learn php).Dale-----Original Message-----From: christophe.billiottet@webdna.us[mailto:christophe.billiottet@webdna.us] Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2010 7:35 AMTo: talk@webdna.usSubject: [WebDNA] Use of MySQL with WebDNAGood morning everyone!this email is for WebDNA users working with MySQL. We would like to know howmany of you need MySQL support and the reason why you prefer using MySQLinstead of the internal database system.As you know, MySQL now belongs to Oracle with license restrictions and wewere thinking, in case external database support is necessary, if abetter/faster ODBC support woud not be a more universal idea. We also gaveSQLite a thought, but despite its qualities, the internal WebDNA databasesystem is more powerful.This is not a trivial matter, so we will listen to everyone.thank you!
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
It would be nice to have better, native support for mySQL. One of myupcoming projects is to build an interface (prefer to use WebDNA) to adatabase that my mail server uses for user logins. It would be far easier for me to do this in WebDNA than php (have no realdesire or need to learn php).Dale-----Original Message-----From: christophe.billiottet@webdna.us[mailto:christophe.billiottet@webdna.us] Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2010 7:35 AMTo: talk@webdna.usSubject: [WebDNA] Use of MySQL with WebDNAGood morning everyone!this email is for WebDNA users working with MySQL. We would like to know howmany of you need MySQL support and the reason why you prefer using MySQLinstead of the internal database system.As you know, MySQL now belongs to Oracle with license restrictions and wewere thinking, in case external database support is necessary, if abetter/faster
ODBC support woud not be a more universal idea. We also gaveSQLite a thought, but despite its qualities, the internal WebDNA databasesystem is more powerful.This is not a trivial matter, so we will listen to everyone.thank you!
"Dale Therio"
DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!
Top Articles:
Talk List
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...
Related Readings:
[applescript] (1999)
The & Problem (1998)
Payflow Pro on OSX (2003)
[WriteFile] problems (1997)
user flush db (2002)
absolute paths for databases? (1997)
Looking for a Manual (1997)
[OT] Xserve (2002)
Unexpected error (1997)
mySQL GROUP BY Aggregate Function Problem (2005)
carriage returns in data (1997)
Summing fields (1997)
[SHOWIF AND/OR] (1997)
Web Logs (1998)
WebCat2b15MacPlugIn - [authenticate] not [protect] (1997)
Error: Too many nested [xxx] contexts (1997)
Problems getting parameters passed into email. (1997)
Extra equals signs with IE? (More debugging questions...) (1997)
using showpage and showcart commands (1996)
Perl programmer needed [OT] (2002)