Re: locking variables?

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2000


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 28858
interpreted = N
texte = on 03/10/00 1:46 PM, WebDNA Support at webdna-support@talk.smithmicro.com wrote:> You can use [FormVariables] at the top of the page to examine which > variables are being overridden by the incoming GET, and put up an > error message or redirect back to the same page without those > particular form variables. We realize the current behavior is not >optimal, and we're revisiting it for 4.0.Will the SM Sado-Masochists post an example of exactly how to do that or do you plan to let us reinvent the wheel...as usual? ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: locking variables? (Kenneth Grome 2000)
  2. Re: locking variables? (Charles Kline 2000)
  3. Re: locking variables? (WebDNA Support 2000)
  4. Re: locking variables? (Glenn Busbin 2000)
  5. Re: locking variables? (Charles Kline 2000)
  6. Re: locking variables? (Jereme Claussen 2000)
  7. Re: locking variables? (Glenn Busbin 2000)
  8. Re: locking variables? (Kenneth Grome 2000)
  9. Re: locking variables? (Kenneth Grome 2000)
  10. Re: locking variables? (WebDNA Support 2000)
  11. Re: locking variables? (Jereme Claussen 2000)
  12. Re: locking variables? (Kenneth Grome 2000)
  13. Re: locking variables? (John Butler 2000)
  14. Re: locking variables? (WebDNA Support 2000)
  15. Re: locking variables? (Kenneth Grome 2000)
  16. locking variables? (Jereme Claussen 2000)
on 03/10/00 1:46 PM, WebDNA Support at webdna-support@talk.smithmicro.com wrote:> You can use [formvariables] at the top of the page to examine which > variables are being overridden by the incoming GET, and put up an > error message or redirect back to the same page without those > particular form variables. We realize the current behavior is not >optimal, and we're revisiting it for 4.0.Will the SM Sado-Masochists post an example of exactly how to do that or do you plan to let us reinvent the wheel...as usual? ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Glenn Busbin

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

RE: File Uploads (1998) Replace and Date (2002) Simple way to create unique SKU (1997) I give up!! (1997) Was 5.0 Pricing, now Sandbox versus Website and ruminating (2003) [WebDNA] 404 Pages (2014) Sense/Disallow HTML tags during $Append (1997) carriage returns in data (1997) Problem with [Search] inside of [Loop]? (1997) php vs WebCatalog (2000) New Webcatalog for Mac (1997) [no_cache]?! (2000) Help! WebCat2 bug (1997) photo upload snippet (2006) Re[2]: Enhancement Request for WebCatalog-NT (1996) WebCatalog can't find database (1997) Search Title Question (1998) Inline Frame HTML editor uploaded (2002) creative use of webcatalog (1998) Running _every_ page through WebCat ? (1997)