Re: What am I doing wrong?

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2000


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 29985
interpreted = N
texte = What virgin of WC r u using. I thing I ran into the problem and I had to use [include file=etc...] APC Net, Inc. - sales@apcn.net - www.apcn.net 4471 NW 36 St. #110 - Miami Springs, FL 33166 Web Hosting,Web Design & Internet Services-----Original Message----- From: WebCatalog Talk [mailto:WebDNA-Talk@talk.smithmicro.com]On Behalf Of Mike Davis Sent: Tuesday, April 04, 2000 5:15 PM To: WebCatalog Talk Subject: Re: What am I doing wrong? No, none of this advice should make a bit of difference. The comment does not have to be in the , and [INCLUDE] contexts do not need to be in the . Webcatalog knows nothing of HTML structure. All Webcat tags will work in any relation to the HTML on the page, so long as the Webcat tags themselves are syntactically correct in relation to themselves. In your case I suspect either improper suffix mapping on the server or adding the file= part to the include such as [include file=bob.txt]Mike> take the WC tag out of the . > put it in tags. And put >> >> >> [include bob.txt] >> >> >> >> But all that returns when I hit the page is the include tag: >> >> [include bob.txt] >> >> bob.txt is a one word text file and I'm sure that it's in the right >> directory! >> >> If the TeaRoom and other WebCatalog pages work then my page should work >> too, right? What am I doing wrong? Thanks! >> ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re[2]: What am I doing wrong? (jpeacock@univpress.com 2000)
  2. Re[2]: What am I doing wrong? (jpeacock@univpress.com 2000)
  3. Re: What am I doing wrong? --GOT IT! (WebDNA Support 2000)
  4. Re: What am I doing wrong? --GOT IT! (Nicolas Verhaeghe 2000)
  5. Re: What am I doing wrong? --GOT IT! (Bob McPeak 2000)
  6. Re: What am I doing wrong? (Bob McPeak 2000)
  7. Re: What am I doing wrong? (Bob McPeak 2000)
  8. Re: What am I doing wrong? (Howard Wolosky 2000)
  9. Re: What am I doing wrong? (Bob McPeak 2000)
  10. Re: What am I doing wrong? (Bob McPeak 2000)
  11. Re: What am I doing wrong? (Howard Wolosky 2000)
  12. Re: What am I doing wrong? (WebDNA Support 2000)
  13. Re: What am I doing wrong? (Bob McPeak 2000)
  14. Re: What am I doing wrong? (Nicolas Verhaeghe 2000)
  15. Re: What am I doing wrong? (WebDNA Support 2000)
  16. Re: What am I doing wrong? (Bob McPeak 2000)
  17. Re: What am I doing wrong? (Vince Medina 2000)
  18. Re: What am I doing wrong? (Vince Medina 2000)
  19. Re: What am I doing wrong? (Bob McPeak 2000)
  20. Re: What am I doing wrong? (Vince Medina 2000)
  21. Re: What am I doing wrong? (Bob McPeak 2000)
  22. Re: What am I doing wrong? (Mike Davis 2000)
  23. Re: What am I doing wrong? (Andy Mowrey 2000)
  24. Re: What am I doing wrong? (kalin@el.net 2000)
  25. What am I doing wrong? (Robert McPeak 2000)
  26. Re: What am I doing wrong? (Brian Boegershausen 2000)
What virgin of WC r u using. I thing I ran into the problem and I had to use [include file=etc...] APC Net, Inc. - sales@apcn.net - www.apcn.net 4471 NW 36 St. #110 - Miami Springs, FL 33166 Web Hosting,Web Design & Internet Services-----Original Message----- From: WebCatalog Talk [mailto:WebDNA-Talk@talk.smithmicro.com]On Behalf Of Mike Davis Sent: Tuesday, April 04, 2000 5:15 PM To: WebCatalog Talk Subject: Re: What am I doing wrong? No, none of this advice should make a bit of difference. The comment does not have to be in the , and [include] contexts do not need to be in the . Webcatalog knows nothing of HTML structure. All Webcat tags will work in any relation to the HTML on the page, so long as the Webcat tags themselves are syntactically correct in relation to themselves. In your case I suspect either improper suffix mapping on the server or adding the file= part to the include such as [include file=bob.txt]Mike> take the WC tag out of the . > put it in tags. And put >> >> >> [include bob.txt] >> >> >> >> But all that returns when I hit the page is the include tag: >> >> [include bob.txt] >> >> bob.txt is a one word text file and I'm sure that it's in the right >> directory! >> >> If the TeaRoom and other WebCatalog pages work then my page should work >> too, right? What am I doing wrong? Thanks! >> ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Vince Medina

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

Webcat serving error page? (2000) A helpful tip to avoid pulling an Aaron (2000) WebCat2b12 - nesting [tags] (1997) Counting files (1998) Middle problem (2004) Cart# (1997) [LOOKUP] (1997) Grep email addresses in bbedit or webdna ... (2003) Strange ShowIf behaviour (2001) setting line item numbers (1998) OT: Need some feedback, please. (2003) Typhoon Pro Admin and Problems (2001) Firesite cache vs webcat cache (1997) This is an odd error (2001) Templates on Unix & CGI on Mac? (1997) Re[2]: 2nd WebCatalog2 Feature Request (1996) Caching [include] files ... (1997) includes and cart numbers (1997) details (2003) Re[2]: Enhancement Request for WebCatalog-NT (1996)