Re: chat opinion ...

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2002


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 42630
interpreted = N
texte = On 8/16/02 8:38 PM, Kenneth Grome wrote:> The chat looks like it was just okay, but it seems as though you > can do a far better job with a new mailing list. What's wrong with this list? I can see doing the chat for the novelty of it and the dynamics of a chat. But is it really useful for development?Robert Minor Director of Internet Services ------------------------------------------------------------ Cybermill Communications http://www.cybermill.com http://www.merchantmaker.comProviding Ecommerce and interactive website development and hosting services on Macintosh, Windows NT, Unix, and AS/400.All your websites are belong to us! ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://search.smithmicro.com/ Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: chat opinion ... (Bob Minor 2002)
  2. Re: chat opinion ... (dale's stuff 2002)
  3. Re: chat opinion ... (Gary Krockover 2002)
  4. Re: chat opinion ... (Donovan Brooke 2002)
  5. Re: chat opinion ... (Howard Wolosky 2002)
  6. Re: chat opinion ... (Dan Strong 2002)
  7. Re: chat opinion ... (Donovan Brooke 2002)
  8. Re: chat opinion ... (Gary Krockover 2002)
  9. Re: chat opinion ... (Bob Minor 2002)
  10. Re: chat opinion ... (Dan Strong 2002)
  11. Re: chat opinion ... (Bob Minor 2002)
  12. Re: chat opinion ... (Bob Minor 2002)
  13. Re: chat opinion ... (Gary Krockover 2002)
  14. Re: chat opinion ... (Donovan Brooke 2002)
  15. Re: chat opinion ... (Gary Krockover 2002)
  16. Re: chat opinion ... (Dan Strong 2002)
  17. Re: chat opinion ... (Andrew Simpson 2002)
  18. Re: chat opinion ... (Bob Minor 2002)
  19. chat opinion ... (Kenneth Grome 2002)
  20. Re: chat opinion ... (Bob Minor 1996)
On 8/16/02 8:38 PM, Kenneth Grome wrote:> The chat looks like it was just okay, but it seems as though you > can do a far better job with a new mailing list. What's wrong with this list? I can see doing the chat for the novelty of it and the dynamics of a chat. But is it really useful for development?Robert Minor Director of Internet Services ------------------------------------------------------------ Cybermill Communications http://www.cybermill.com http://www.merchantmaker.comProviding Ecommerce and interactive website development and hosting services on Macintosh, Windows NT, Unix, and AS/400.All your websites are belong to us! ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://search.smithmicro.com/ Bob Minor

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

[WebDNA] Security best practice (2009) Weighting of grouped results possible? (was: grouping fieldsquestion) (1998) A little syntax help (1997) no time stamp & different times from emailer (1998) GuestBook example (1997) WebCatalog can't find database (1997) RE: Which [index]? (1997) Numbers only code (2000) 10.4 Tiger Server with webdna (2005) Showif date > other date (2004) PCS Frames (1997) Claris HomePage messes up the code (1997) protect tag on NT IIS (1997) problems with 2 tags shakur (1997) WCS Newbie question (1997) Correction: New WebDNA Example from Olin -- (1998) Emailer (2000) WCS Newbie question (1997) Country & Ship-to address & other fields ? (1997) ConverChars (1999)