Re: chat opinion ...

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2002


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 42636
interpreted = N
texte = Dan Strong wrote:> My 2 cents (USD, of course): > > 1) The fact that SM had a chat at all was cool and > definitely a step in the right direction, however, as Ken > pointed out, many various things about the nature of chats > themselves (scheduling, hard to follow, etc. etc.) make it > a not-so-ideal medium to conduct serious business and/or > research IMHO.Chats are good customer relations. It looked like Sal had a hard time raining in the ppl who attended. :-) Anyway, as far as chats go.. 4D had a pretty cool one that I attended. It was a phone and computer based one. As suggested there were differing time slots to fit the best for everyone. They used www.webex.com to provide real examples of there recent 4D portal. This was kinda nice because if you didn't like saying much (like me) you could just listen and watch the examples. It was kind of three phases. It actually had a typing chat thing, a presentation where you were looking at the presentors computer screen, and hearing the voices from the phone call.> > > 2) This list is cool too, and, yes, I know it's archived, > but I think the idea of a 'Forum' (basically a threaded > message board requiring registration) where we hold these > discussions would be the best of both worlds. We could > discuss and also archive at the same time, while allowing > the subject matter (WebDNA) to be more visable and > therefore accessible and therefore less scary to newbies > who will (hopefully) therefore begin to start coding in it > faster and then we can all therefore start getting filthy > stinking rich and sip Spring Fever Fizzes off of naked > island women's bellies while Ken Grome's sweatshop cranks > out line after line of code for the cost of the little > umbrellas in our drinks!!!!!! .....BWAHA HA HA!!! > > Ahem, excuse me... sorry about that. Seriously, I think > that Sal's vision of the forum is an excellent idea from a > marketing standpoint and I'm all for it. > > 3) I don't know what will happen to the list. Maybe it > will die. Maybe not. Any ideas on that? Really, what would > be the use of an email-based talklist when we have the > forum running?real answers Now, what do ya'all think about the points in the forum?Such as the membership levels?Donovan> > > -Dan > ------------------------------------------- > http://www.StrongGraphicDesign.com > (208) 319-0137 | Toll-free p/f 877-561-1656 > > ------------------------------------------------------------- > This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to > the mailing list . > To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to > Web Archive of this list is at: http://search.smithmicro.com/ ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://search.smithmicro.com/ Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: chat opinion ... (Bob Minor 2002)
  2. Re: chat opinion ... (dale's stuff 2002)
  3. Re: chat opinion ... (Gary Krockover 2002)
  4. Re: chat opinion ... (Donovan Brooke 2002)
  5. Re: chat opinion ... (Howard Wolosky 2002)
  6. Re: chat opinion ... (Dan Strong 2002)
  7. Re: chat opinion ... (Donovan Brooke 2002)
  8. Re: chat opinion ... (Gary Krockover 2002)
  9. Re: chat opinion ... (Bob Minor 2002)
  10. Re: chat opinion ... (Dan Strong 2002)
  11. Re: chat opinion ... (Bob Minor 2002)
  12. Re: chat opinion ... (Bob Minor 2002)
  13. Re: chat opinion ... (Gary Krockover 2002)
  14. Re: chat opinion ... (Donovan Brooke 2002)
  15. Re: chat opinion ... (Gary Krockover 2002)
  16. Re: chat opinion ... (Dan Strong 2002)
  17. Re: chat opinion ... (Andrew Simpson 2002)
  18. Re: chat opinion ... (Bob Minor 2002)
  19. chat opinion ... (Kenneth Grome 2002)
  20. Re: chat opinion ... (Bob Minor 1996)
Dan Strong wrote:> My 2 cents (USD, of course): > > 1) The fact that SM had a chat at all was cool and > definitely a step in the right direction, however, as Ken > pointed out, many various things about the nature of chats > themselves (scheduling, hard to follow, etc. etc.) make it > a not-so-ideal medium to conduct serious business and/or > research IMHO.Chats are good customer relations. It looked like Sal had a hard time raining in the ppl who attended. :-) Anyway, as far as chats go.. 4D had a pretty cool one that I attended. It was a phone and computer based one. As suggested there were differing time slots to fit the best for everyone. They used www.webex.com to provide real examples of there recent 4D portal. This was kinda nice because if you didn't like saying much (like me) you could just listen and watch the examples. It was kind of three phases. It actually had a typing chat thing, a presentation where you were looking at the presentors computer screen, and hearing the voices from the phone call.> > > 2) This list is cool too, and, yes, I know it's archived, > but I think the idea of a 'Forum' (basically a threaded > message board requiring registration) where we hold these > discussions would be the best of both worlds. We could > discuss and also archive at the same time, while allowing > the subject matter (WebDNA) to be more visable and > therefore accessible and therefore less scary to newbies > who will (hopefully) therefore begin to start coding in it > faster and then we can all therefore start getting filthy > stinking rich and sip Spring Fever Fizzes off of naked > island women's bellies while Ken Grome's sweatshop cranks > out line after line of code for the cost of the little > umbrellas in our drinks!!!!!! .....BWAHA HA HA!!! > > Ahem, excuse me... sorry about that. Seriously, I think > that Sal's vision of the forum is an excellent idea from a > marketing standpoint and I'm all for it. > > 3) I don't know what will happen to the list. Maybe it > will die. Maybe not. Any ideas on that? Really, what would > be the use of an email-based talklist when we have the > forum running?real answers Now, what do ya'all think about the points in the forum?Such as the membership levels?Donovan> > > -Dan > ------------------------------------------- > http://www.StrongGraphicDesign.com > (208) 319-0137 | Toll-free p/f 877-561-1656 > > ------------------------------------------------------------- > This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to > the mailing list . > To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to > Web Archive of this list is at: http://search.smithmicro.com/ ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://search.smithmicro.com/ Donovan Brooke

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

Problem (1997) ShoppingCart Woes (1998) SSL and reg web* (1997) Help!!!! Purchases not going through! FIXED! (1997) Forms to db's and back (was Displaying text and (2005) RequiredFields template (1997) Secure Cookies (2008) orders being printed (1998) Running _every_ page through WebCat-error.html (1997) 2.0Beta Command Ref (can't find this instruction) (1997) Error: Can't open order file. Ignoring [OrderFile] context (2000) [WebDNA] Ken Grome's email address ... (2008) New WebCatalog Version !!! (1997) ShowNext (1997) GD Spam (2003) Listpath stops WebCat (2002) Problem with broken images (2004) RE: Languages (1997) BugNote#1 - listdatabases fails on MacOS ... (2000) Moving Files (2000)