Why WebDNA is not popular

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2002


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 45022
interpreted = N
texte = Like I said earlier, webDNA is just not as 'sexy-crazy-cool' as Cold Fusion and php...don't believe me? Look here:http://www.StrongGraphicDesign.com/images/PHP.jpg http://www.StrongGraphicDesign.com/images/Cold_Fusion.jpgOk, all. Have a good holiday weekend. I'm outta here.-Dan ------------------------------------------- http://www.StrongGraphicDesign.com (208) 319-0137 | Toll-free p/f 877-561-1656------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://search.smithmicro.com/ Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: WebDNA Challenge - Was: Why WebDNA is not popular (Frank Nordberg 2002)
  2. Re: WebDNA Challenge - Was: Why WebDNA is not popular (Donovan Brooke 2002)
  3. Re: WebDNA Challenge - Was: Why WebDNA is not popular (Donovan Brooke 2002)
  4. Re: WebDNA Challenge - Was: Why WebDNA is not popular (Andrew Simpson 2002)
  5. Re: WebDNA Challenge - Was: Why WebDNA is not popular (Alain Russell 2002)
  6. Re: WebDNA Challenge - Was: Why WebDNA is not popular (Bob Minor 2002)
  7. Re: WebDNA Challenge - Was: Why WebDNA is not popular (Kenneth Grome 2002)
  8. Re: WebDNA Challenge - Was: Why WebDNA is not popular (Kenneth Grome 2002)
  9. Re: WebDNA Challenge - Was: Why WebDNA is not popular (Brian Boegershausen 2002)
  10. Re: WebDNA Challenge - Was: Why WebDNA is not popular (Alain Russell 2002)
  11. Re: WebDNA Challenge - Was: Why WebDNA is not popular (Kenneth Grome 2002)
  12. WebDNA Challenge - Was: Why WebDNA is not popular (Alain Russell 2002)
  13. Re: Why WebDNA is not popular (Andrew Simpson 2002)
  14. Re: Why WebDNA is not popular (Frank Nordberg 2002)
  15. Re: Why WebDNA is not popular (Nitai @ ComputerOil 2002)
  16. Re: Why WebDNA is not popular (Gary Krockover 2002)
  17. Re: Why WebDNA is not popular (Nitai @ ComputerOil 2002)
  18. Re: Why WebDNA is not popular (Donovan 2002)
  19. Re: Why WebDNA is not popular (Phillip Bonesteele 2002)
  20. Re: Why WebDNA is not popular (Pedro Rivera 2002)
  21. Re: Why WebDNA is not popular (Arturo Vargas 2002)
  22. Re: Why WebDNA is not popular (Doug Deck 2002)
  23. Why WebDNA is not popular (Dan Strong 2002)
Like I said earlier, webDNA is just not as 'sexy-crazy-cool' as Cold Fusion and php...don't believe me? Look here:http://www.StrongGraphicDesign.com/images/PHP.jpg http://www.StrongGraphicDesign.com/images/Cold_Fusion.jpgOk, all. Have a good holiday weekend. I'm outta here.-Dan ------------------------------------------- http://www.StrongGraphicDesign.com (208) 319-0137 | Toll-free p/f 877-561-1656------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://search.smithmicro.com/ Dan Strong

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

using showpage and showcart commands (1996) Error 11 (1996) Question from a Neebie (2000) How to get shownext to just shownext once (1997) [WebDNA] Recaptcha 2.0 and WebDNA (2015) Shownext problems (1999) Error page mapping problems (2002) Reversed words (1997) Setting up the server (1997) Finalizing Orders (2000) HELP!? (2002) AND/OR searches in WebCat 3.07 (2003) errormessages.db (1997) Does [Sendmail] create html? (2002) Need help... (1997) Protect vs Authenicate (1997) cookie based login process (2004) More than one db with the same namn (was: WC2f3) (1997) searching twice on same field (1998) Re1000001: Setting up shop (1997)