Re: Me know logical no need

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2002


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 41336
interpreted = N
texte = Legend .. Your cheered up the end of my day ;)> Hahahahaha Oh, how you make me laugh. > Yes, they spent $500,000 on hardware. (that they've been 'implementing' > since 2000) > > They have 3 t1's > They have a load-balanced cluster of ftp servers to feed those three piddly > t1's > Last week they went down for 12+ hours because they don't have a generator, > their UPS failed, and they had no monitoring to tell them, so it was fixed > at 8 am when somebody noticed the NOC was lukewarm and unusually quiet. > > They have been unable to add a single field of additional data which was > approved OVER a year ago. > > BUT just last week they announced that they would be adding a field for 'no > internet advertising' Now, they remove the NIA listings before giving them > to us, so basically they are adding 500,000 TABS, because that field will > __ALWAYS__ be empty. > > > I thought I told you not to get me started!? And did I mention they are > stupid? ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://search.smithmicro.com/ Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: SOLUTION? Re: Me know logical no need (John Peacock 2002)
  2. Re: SOLUTION? Re: Me know logical no need (Jesse Williams-Proudman 2002)
  3. Re: SOLUTION? Re: Me know logical no need (John Peacock 2002)
  4. Re: SOLUTION? Re: Me know logical no need (Brian Fries 2002)
  5. SOLUTION? Re: Me know logical no need (Joseph D'Andrea 2002)
  6. Re: Me know logical no need (Dan Strong 2002)
  7. Re: Me know logical no need (Michael Davis 2002)
  8. Re: Me know logical no need (Aaron Lynch 2002)
  9. Re: Me know logical no need (Michael Davis 2002)
  10. Re: Me know logical no need Now totally OT (Aaron Lynch 2002)
  11. Re: Me know logical no need (Glenn Busbin 2002)
  12. Re: Me know logical no need (Aaron Lynch 2002)
  13. Re: Me know logical no need (Andrew Simpson 2002)
  14. Re: Me know logical no need (Alain Russell 2002)
  15. Re: Me know logical no need (Kenneth Grome 2002)
  16. Re: Me know logical no need (Aaron Lynch 2002)
  17. Re: Me know logical no need (Andrew Simpson 2002)
  18. Re: Me know logical no need (Aaron Lynch 2002)
  19. Re: Me know logical no need (Glenn Busbin 2002)
  20. Re: Me know logical no need (Aaron Lynch 2002)
  21. Re: Me know logical no need (Andrew Simpson 2002)
  22. Re: Me know logical no need (Kenneth Grome 2002)
  23. Re: Me know logical no need (Kenneth Grome 2002)
  24. Re: Me know logical no need (Aaron Lynch 2002)
  25. Re: Me know logical no need (Stuart Tremain 2002)
  26. Re: Me know logical no need (Aaron Lynch 2002)
  27. Re: Me know logical no need (Aaron Lynch 2002)
  28. Re: Me know logical no need (Jesse Williams-Proudman 2002)
  29. Re: Me know logical no need (Jesse Williams-Proudman 2002)
  30. Re: Me know logical no need (Alain Russell 2002)
  31. Re: Me know logical no need (Glenn Busbin 2002)
  32. Re: Me know logical no need (Aaron Lynch 2002)
  33. Re: Me know logical no need (Stuart Tremain 2002)
  34. Re: Me know logical no need (Robert Wade 2002)
  35. Re: Me know logical no need (Alain Russell 2002)
  36. Re: Me know logical no need (Andrew Simpson 2002)
  37. Me know logical no need (Aaron Lynch 2002)
Legend .. Your cheered up the end of my day ;)> Hahahahaha Oh, how you make me laugh. > Yes, they spent $500,000 on hardware. (that they've been 'implementing' > since 2000) > > They have 3 t1's > They have a load-balanced cluster of ftp servers to feed those three piddly > t1's > Last week they went down for 12+ hours because they don't have a generator, > their UPS failed, and they had no monitoring to tell them, so it was fixed > at 8 am when somebody noticed the NOC was lukewarm and unusually quiet. > > They have been unable to add a single field of additional data which was > approved OVER a year ago. > > BUT just last week they announced that they would be adding a field for 'no > internet advertising' Now, they remove the NIA listings before giving them > to us, so basically they are adding 500,000 TABS, because that field will > __ALWAYS__ be empty. > > > I thought I told you not to get me started!? And did I mention they are > stupid? ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://search.smithmicro.com/ Alain Russell

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

PCS Frames-Default page is solution! (1997) WebTen? (1997) Letters as SKU (1998) Fwd: Problems with Webcatalog Plug-in (1997) WebCat2 Append problem (B14Macacgi) (1997) E-Mail (1998) Email encryption (1998) A question on sub-categories (1997) Dr. Watson Error (1998) Extended [ConvertChars] (1997) Cart Template (1997) Hosts who have upgraded to v5.0? (2003) BinaryBody for ReturnRaw (2003) Progress !! WAS: Trouble with formula.db (1997) WebCat2b15MacPlugIn - [authenticate] not [protect] (1997) Cookies and webcat (1997) $Append for Users outside the ADMIN group (1997) Error Page? (1997) OT: Free Search Tools (2003) ie Posting error (2000)