Re: Me know logical no need

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2002


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 41361
interpreted = N
texte = How about optimizing search of large database or alternatives to complex searches or possible performance problems with large db queries or Me Tarzan you Jane, I don't know. Me know logical no need What does that mean? LOL Sorry for the rant. I didn't expect it to become anything more than that.MikeOn Wednesday, July 10, 2002, at 02:04 AM, Aaron Lynch wrote:> OK, what would a useful subject be? Seriously, this is abstract > help with > logic for a specific search problem. > > Short of coping with bad data from Northwest Multiple Listing > Service what > sort of subject would cover a bunch of what if's? > > > > On 7/10/02 1:18 AM, Michael Davis mashed the following keys : > >> >> If you've ever wondered why searching the archives for relevant >> keywords in the Subject of messages is generally frustrating, take >> note of the subject of this thread. Who comes up with this sh#!. >> This thread has a good amount of helpful information in it, but the >> subject is from another planet. It's completely worthless. I >> don't even know if a three year old could come up with a subject >> more inane. >> -- ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://search.smithmicro.com/ Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: SOLUTION? Re: Me know logical no need (John Peacock 2002)
  2. Re: SOLUTION? Re: Me know logical no need (Jesse Williams-Proudman 2002)
  3. Re: SOLUTION? Re: Me know logical no need (John Peacock 2002)
  4. Re: SOLUTION? Re: Me know logical no need (Brian Fries 2002)
  5. SOLUTION? Re: Me know logical no need (Joseph D'Andrea 2002)
  6. Re: Me know logical no need (Dan Strong 2002)
  7. Re: Me know logical no need (Michael Davis 2002)
  8. Re: Me know logical no need (Aaron Lynch 2002)
  9. Re: Me know logical no need (Michael Davis 2002)
  10. Re: Me know logical no need Now totally OT (Aaron Lynch 2002)
  11. Re: Me know logical no need (Glenn Busbin 2002)
  12. Re: Me know logical no need (Aaron Lynch 2002)
  13. Re: Me know logical no need (Andrew Simpson 2002)
  14. Re: Me know logical no need (Alain Russell 2002)
  15. Re: Me know logical no need (Kenneth Grome 2002)
  16. Re: Me know logical no need (Aaron Lynch 2002)
  17. Re: Me know logical no need (Andrew Simpson 2002)
  18. Re: Me know logical no need (Aaron Lynch 2002)
  19. Re: Me know logical no need (Glenn Busbin 2002)
  20. Re: Me know logical no need (Aaron Lynch 2002)
  21. Re: Me know logical no need (Andrew Simpson 2002)
  22. Re: Me know logical no need (Kenneth Grome 2002)
  23. Re: Me know logical no need (Kenneth Grome 2002)
  24. Re: Me know logical no need (Aaron Lynch 2002)
  25. Re: Me know logical no need (Stuart Tremain 2002)
  26. Re: Me know logical no need (Aaron Lynch 2002)
  27. Re: Me know logical no need (Aaron Lynch 2002)
  28. Re: Me know logical no need (Jesse Williams-Proudman 2002)
  29. Re: Me know logical no need (Jesse Williams-Proudman 2002)
  30. Re: Me know logical no need (Alain Russell 2002)
  31. Re: Me know logical no need (Glenn Busbin 2002)
  32. Re: Me know logical no need (Aaron Lynch 2002)
  33. Re: Me know logical no need (Stuart Tremain 2002)
  34. Re: Me know logical no need (Robert Wade 2002)
  35. Re: Me know logical no need (Alain Russell 2002)
  36. Re: Me know logical no need (Andrew Simpson 2002)
  37. Me know logical no need (Aaron Lynch 2002)
How about optimizing search of large database or alternatives to complex searches or possible performance problems with large db queries or Me Tarzan you Jane, I don't know. Me know logical no need What does that mean? LOL Sorry for the rant. I didn't expect it to become anything more than that.MikeOn Wednesday, July 10, 2002, at 02:04 AM, Aaron Lynch wrote:> OK, what would a useful subject be? Seriously, this is abstract > help with > logic for a specific search problem. > > Short of coping with bad data from Northwest Multiple Listing > Service what > sort of subject would cover a bunch of what if's? > > > > On 7/10/02 1:18 AM, Michael Davis mashed the following keys : > >> >> If you've ever wondered why searching the archives for relevant >> keywords in the Subject of messages is generally frustrating, take >> note of the subject of this thread. Who comes up with this sh#!. >> This thread has a good amount of helpful information in it, but the >> subject is from another planet. It's completely worthless. I >> don't even know if a three year old could come up with a subject >> more inane. >> -- ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://search.smithmicro.com/ Michael Davis

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

WebCatalog2 Feature Feedback (1996) WebCat2: Items xx to xx shown, etc. (1997) RE: [WebDNA] [OT] Phone solution for multiple companies at same (2010) WebCat cannot handle compatible search parameters? (1997) Web Developer Product Awards (1997) For those of you not on the WebCatalog Beta... (1997) Showif Error Generated... (2003) Image maps/Webcat (1997) MacAuthorize order data fields WAS:How To question... (1997) Bug Report, maybe (1997) & not allowed in db by definition? (1999) range searching (1998) Emailer again & again (1997) Applescript, WebDNA, and PDF (1997) frames & carts (1997) Installing on IIS 5.1 Windows XP Pro - Username/Password (2006) Where can I find hex equivalents for ASCII characters? (2000) GrandTotal not right (1997) WebCat2b12 CGI Mac - [shownext] problem (1997) WC2.0 Memory Requirements (1997)