Re: What really killed WebDNA?
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 2007
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 69368
interpreted = N
texte = Hi,I've been wondering the same thing for a long time, as I am converting asite from WebDNA to PHP and upgrading the site. Seeing that SM isn'tupdating their software, I personally think that WebDNA would have beengreat if it was kept up to date or as Dan says sell it to someone who doesgive a shit or open source it.Chris.-----Original Message-----From: WebDNA Talk [mailto:WebDNA-Talk@talk.smithmicro.com] On Behalf Of DanStrongSent: Thursday, October 18, 2007 10:11 PMTo: WebDNA TalkSubject: Re: What really killed WebDNA?Funny, I had an IT person ask me yesterday why WebDNA didn't make it (aftershowing him 36 lines of asp.NET code vs. one line of WebDNA to do the same thing), and I said"bad marketing". I really wish SMSI would open source it too, or, failing that, sell it to someone whogives a shit.-DanOn Thu, 18 Oct 2007 21:42:03 -0500 "Will Starck"
wrote:> Hello-> > So, I've finally come to terms with the fact that WebDNA died round about> 2004 give or take a few days.> > Aside from the fact that SMSI was always a terrible fit for this product(my> apologies SM, but it's true), I've often wondered-what exactly was it that> killed WebDNA (btw, I always hated that name)? > > I've always been curious about that question.> > Was there a technical reason (i.e. inability to integrate it to emergingweb> development trends, lack of new potential features that would justify> further upgrade cycles) or did SM just lose interest, or is/are there some> other reason(s)?> > I'd be interested in your theories - is there any reason to push for anopen> source version, or should this dead horse stay dead because it is> irrelevant?> > Your long suffering friend,> > Will Starck> > > > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------> This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to> the mailing list .> To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to> Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/-------------------------------------------------------------This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list .To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail toWeb Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/-------------------------------------------------------------This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list .To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
Hi,I've been wondering the same thing for a long time, as I am converting asite from WebDNA to PHP and upgrading the site. Seeing that SM isn'tupdating their software, I personally think that WebDNA would have beengreat if it was kept up to date or as Dan says sell it to someone who doesgive a shit or open source it.Chris.-----Original Message-----From: WebDNA Talk [mailto:WebDNA-Talk@talk.smithmicro.com] On Behalf Of DanStrongSent: Thursday, October 18, 2007 10:11 PMTo: WebDNA TalkSubject: Re: What really killed WebDNA?Funny, I had an IT person ask me yesterday why WebDNA didn't make it (aftershowing him 36 lines of asp.NET code vs. one line of WebDNA to do the same thing), and I said"bad marketing". I really wish SMSI would open source it too, or, failing that, sell it to someone whogives a shit.-DanOn Thu, 18 Oct 2007 21:42:03 -0500 "Will Starck" wrote:> Hello-> > So, I've finally come to terms with the fact that WebDNA died round about> 2004 give or take a few days.> > Aside from the fact that SMSI was always a terrible fit for this product(my> apologies SM, but it's true), I've often wondered-what exactly was it that> killed WebDNA (btw, I always hated that name)? > > I've always been curious about that question.> > Was there a technical reason (i.e. inability to integrate it to emergingweb> development trends, lack of new potential features that would justify> further upgrade cycles) or did SM just lose interest, or is/are there some> other reason(s)?> > I'd be interested in your theories - is there any reason to push for anopen> source version, or should this dead horse stay dead because it is> irrelevant?> > Your long suffering friend,> > Will Starck> > > > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------> This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to> the mailing list .> To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to> Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/-------------------------------------------------------------This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list .To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail toWeb Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/-------------------------------------------------------------This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list .To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/
"Chris Moore"
DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!
Top Articles:
Talk List
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...
Related Readings:
stray LF character in the email (2003)
WebCommerce: Folder organization ? (1997)
Great product and great job ! (1997)
webcat 2.1 (1997)
Problem (1997)
Summary search -- speed (1997)
(1997)
Bug alert! (1997)
Sending Mail Confirmation (2002)
WC2b15 File Corruption (1997)
Problem displaying search result (1997)
Reverse dating (1999)
Ok here is a question? (1997)
little help (2001)
syntax question, not in online refernce (1997)
Searching in multiple databases from a form (1999)
RE: Upload (1998)
Protect vs Authenicate (1997)
suffix mapping, use of cache, etc. (1997)
[OT] (waaaay OT) further off topic than before (2004)