Re: What really killed WebDNA?

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2007


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 69365
interpreted = N
texte = ....SmithMicro offering "support"? Waa-haa-haa! Best laugh in a whole year (with tears in my eyes and all)... But I'm 100% for open sourcing WebDNA to finally set it free from =20 it's current dead end. Excellent message, Le 07-10-18 =E0 22:52, Vincent Medina a =E9crit : > Absolutely there should be an open source project opened. WebDNA is =20= > SOOOOO > easy to do what other languages take lines and lines of code. SM =20 > should > offer a CE (Community Edition - FREE) and a Pro version which includes > product support etc. It is the smart thing to do and shouldn't cost =20= > them > anything and they still retain the rights! > > I still remember other coders messing with Cold Fusion and other =20 > CGI apps > trying to get a simple functional shopping cart working. I went out =20= > on the > net and found Pacific Cost Software spent $600 for a license and =20 > had a cart > working in 2 hours with no coding experience! It would be such a =20 > shame to > see this product die....... > > Vince > APCN > > > -----Original Message----- > From: WebDNA Talk [mailto:WebDNA-Talk@talk.smithmicro.com] On =20 > Behalf Of Will > Starck > Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2007 10:42 PM > To: WebDNA Talk > Subject: What really killed WebDNA? > > Hello- > > So, I've finally come to terms with the fact that WebDNA died round =20= > about > 2004 give or take a few days. > > Aside from the fact that SMSI was always a terrible fit for this =20 > product (my > apologies SM, but it's true), I've often wondered-what exactly was =20 > it that > killed WebDNA (btw, I always hated that name)? > > I've always been curious about that question. > > Was there a technical reason (i.e. inability to integrate it to =20 > emerging web > development trends, lack of new potential features that would justify > further upgrade cycles) or did SM just lose interest, or is/are =20 > there some > other reason(s)? > > I'd be interested in your theories - is there any reason to push =20 > for an open > source version, or should this dead horse stay dead because it is > irrelevant? > > Your long suffering friend, > > Will Starck > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------- > This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to > the mailing list . > To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to > > Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ > > > ------------------------------------------------------------- > This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to > the mailing list . > To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to digest@talk.smithmicro.com> > Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: What really killed WebDNA? ( Toby Cox 2007)
  2. Re: What really killed WebDNA? ( Larry Hewitt 2007)
  3. Re: What really killed WebDNA? ( Jesse Proudman 2007)
  4. Re: What really killed WebDNA? ( Donovan Brooke 2007)
  5. Re: What really killed WebDNA? ( Clint Davis 2007)
  6. Re: What really killed WebDNA? ( Matthew Bohne 2007)
  7. Re: What really killed WebDNA? ( "Gary Krockover" 2007)
  8. Re: What really killed WebDNA? ( Paul Willis 2007)
  9. Re: What really killed WebDNA? ( "Dan Strong" 2007)
  10. Re: What really killed WebDNA? ( Dean Smith 2007)
  11. Re: What really killed WebDNA? ( Frank Nordberg 2007)
  12. Re: What really killed WebDNA? ( "Will Starck" 2007)
  13. Re: What really killed WebDNA? ( Charles Kline 2007)
  14. Re: What really killed WebDNA? ( Frank Nordberg 2007)
  15. Re: What really killed WebDNA? ( Donovan Brooke 2007)
  16. Re: What really killed WebDNA? ( Stuart Tremain 2007)
  17. Re: What really killed WebDNA? ( "Chris Moore" 2007)
  18. Re: What really killed WebDNA? ( "Dan Strong" 2007)
  19. Re: What really killed WebDNA? ( Gary Krockover 2007)
  20. Re: What really killed WebDNA? ( Claude Gelinas 2007)
  21. Re: What really killed WebDNA? ( Stuart Tremain 2007)
  22. Re: What really killed WebDNA? ( "Vincent Medina" 2007)
  23. What really killed WebDNA? ( "Will Starck" 2007)
....SmithMicro offering "support"? Waa-haa-haa! Best laugh in a whole year (with tears in my eyes and all)... But I'm 100% for open sourcing WebDNA to finally set it free from =20 it's current dead end. Excellent message, Le 07-10-18 =E0 22:52, Vincent Medina a =E9crit : > Absolutely there should be an open source project opened. WebDNA is =20= > SOOOOO > easy to do what other languages take lines and lines of code. SM =20 > should > offer a CE (Community Edition - FREE) and a Pro version which includes > product support etc. It is the smart thing to do and shouldn't cost =20= > them > anything and they still retain the rights! > > I still remember other coders messing with Cold Fusion and other =20 > CGI apps > trying to get a simple functional shopping cart working. I went out =20= > on the > net and found Pacific Cost Software spent $600 for a license and =20 > had a cart > working in 2 hours with no coding experience! It would be such a =20 > shame to > see this product die....... > > Vince > APCN > > > -----Original Message----- > From: WebDNA Talk [mailto:WebDNA-Talk@talk.smithmicro.com] On =20 > Behalf Of Will > Starck > Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2007 10:42 PM > To: WebDNA Talk > Subject: What really killed WebDNA? > > Hello- > > So, I've finally come to terms with the fact that WebDNA died round =20= > about > 2004 give or take a few days. > > Aside from the fact that SMSI was always a terrible fit for this =20 > product (my > apologies SM, but it's true), I've often wondered-what exactly was =20 > it that > killed WebDNA (btw, I always hated that name)? > > I've always been curious about that question. > > Was there a technical reason (i.e. inability to integrate it to =20 > emerging web > development trends, lack of new potential features that would justify > further upgrade cycles) or did SM just lose interest, or is/are =20 > there some > other reason(s)? > > I'd be interested in your theories - is there any reason to push =20 > for an open > source version, or should this dead horse stay dead because it is > irrelevant? > > Your long suffering friend, > > Will Starck > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------- > This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to > the mailing list . > To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to > > Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ > > > ------------------------------------------------------------- > This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to > the mailing list . > To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to digest@talk.smithmicro.com> > Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ Claude Gelinas

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

Opinion: [input] should be called [output] ... (1997) would this be a good use of [spawn]? (2002) To brighten your day... (2006) PROTECT Q (2000) OT- AS/400 and Macs (2003) [group] ? (1997) WebCat editing, SiteGuard & SiteEdit (1997) Security Question (1997) Temp DB (Was freeze) (2003) searches with dash, period etc. (back form politeness) (2000) updating with ProductEditor (1998) HELP - NONE STOP DIGESTS. Digest for 4/24/97) (1997) Re:[WebDNA] Mac OS X LION has no FastCGI (2011) Still having install problems (2000) Text data with spaces in them... (1997) Frames and WebCat (1997) Cart # Starting at 1000 (2000) WC2.0 Memory Requirements (1997) Search in 2 or more catalogs (1997) WebCat2.0 acgi vs plugin (1997)