Re: What really killed WebDNA?

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2007


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 69385
interpreted = N
texte = The WebDNA MySQL combination never quite worked right. It's partially useable, but many SQL calls w/ functions returned bogus values. -- Jesse Proudman, Blue Box Group, LLC On Oct 22, 2007, at 10:10 AM, Donovan Brooke wrote: >> 1. Scalability. A RAM-resident database is extremely fast, but it >> puts all >> your eggs in one basket. The html and the database have to reside >> on the >> same machine which prevents load-balancing. > > Even if you use mySql databases? ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: What really killed WebDNA? ( Toby Cox 2007)
  2. Re: What really killed WebDNA? ( Larry Hewitt 2007)
  3. Re: What really killed WebDNA? ( Jesse Proudman 2007)
  4. Re: What really killed WebDNA? ( Donovan Brooke 2007)
  5. Re: What really killed WebDNA? ( Clint Davis 2007)
  6. Re: What really killed WebDNA? ( Matthew Bohne 2007)
  7. Re: What really killed WebDNA? ( "Gary Krockover" 2007)
  8. Re: What really killed WebDNA? ( Paul Willis 2007)
  9. Re: What really killed WebDNA? ( "Dan Strong" 2007)
  10. Re: What really killed WebDNA? ( Dean Smith 2007)
  11. Re: What really killed WebDNA? ( Frank Nordberg 2007)
  12. Re: What really killed WebDNA? ( "Will Starck" 2007)
  13. Re: What really killed WebDNA? ( Charles Kline 2007)
  14. Re: What really killed WebDNA? ( Frank Nordberg 2007)
  15. Re: What really killed WebDNA? ( Donovan Brooke 2007)
  16. Re: What really killed WebDNA? ( Stuart Tremain 2007)
  17. Re: What really killed WebDNA? ( "Chris Moore" 2007)
  18. Re: What really killed WebDNA? ( "Dan Strong" 2007)
  19. Re: What really killed WebDNA? ( Gary Krockover 2007)
  20. Re: What really killed WebDNA? ( Claude Gelinas 2007)
  21. Re: What really killed WebDNA? ( Stuart Tremain 2007)
  22. Re: What really killed WebDNA? ( "Vincent Medina" 2007)
  23. What really killed WebDNA? ( "Will Starck" 2007)
The WebDNA MySQL combination never quite worked right. It's partially useable, but many SQL calls w/ functions returned bogus values. -- Jesse Proudman, Blue Box Group, LLC On Oct 22, 2007, at 10:10 AM, Donovan Brooke wrote: >> 1. Scalability. A RAM-resident database is extremely fast, but it >> puts all >> your eggs in one basket. The html and the database have to reside >> on the >> same machine which prevents load-balancing. > > Even if you use mySql databases? ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ Jesse Proudman

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

Faxing orders in place of email (1997) [dos] command and [math] (1998) Shell traceroute (2001) Cookie Question (1999) Help with Repost Data msg from form (1997) Snake Bites (1997) Help with Shipping Costs (1997) Open Market's Transact & Macintosh (1998) Press Release hit the NewsWire!!! (1997) Displaying raw values (long) (1998) Checking two required fields (1998) [WebDNA] OLD list archives? (2010) HELP WITH DATES (1997) RE: [taxRate] [TaxTotal] ? (1997) shipping costs (1997) Nested search (1997) can WC render sites out? (1997) Strange intermittent WebDNA problems (2008) Typhoon Rev. and PCS store problems (1999) [ModDate] & [ModTime] ? (1997)