Re: What really killed WebDNA?

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2007


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 69385
interpreted = N
texte = The WebDNA MySQL combination never quite worked right. It's partially useable, but many SQL calls w/ functions returned bogus values. -- Jesse Proudman, Blue Box Group, LLC On Oct 22, 2007, at 10:10 AM, Donovan Brooke wrote: >> 1. Scalability. A RAM-resident database is extremely fast, but it >> puts all >> your eggs in one basket. The html and the database have to reside >> on the >> same machine which prevents load-balancing. > > Even if you use mySql databases? ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: What really killed WebDNA? ( Toby Cox 2007)
  2. Re: What really killed WebDNA? ( Larry Hewitt 2007)
  3. Re: What really killed WebDNA? ( Jesse Proudman 2007)
  4. Re: What really killed WebDNA? ( Donovan Brooke 2007)
  5. Re: What really killed WebDNA? ( Clint Davis 2007)
  6. Re: What really killed WebDNA? ( Matthew Bohne 2007)
  7. Re: What really killed WebDNA? ( "Gary Krockover" 2007)
  8. Re: What really killed WebDNA? ( Paul Willis 2007)
  9. Re: What really killed WebDNA? ( "Dan Strong" 2007)
  10. Re: What really killed WebDNA? ( Dean Smith 2007)
  11. Re: What really killed WebDNA? ( Frank Nordberg 2007)
  12. Re: What really killed WebDNA? ( "Will Starck" 2007)
  13. Re: What really killed WebDNA? ( Charles Kline 2007)
  14. Re: What really killed WebDNA? ( Frank Nordberg 2007)
  15. Re: What really killed WebDNA? ( Donovan Brooke 2007)
  16. Re: What really killed WebDNA? ( Stuart Tremain 2007)
  17. Re: What really killed WebDNA? ( "Chris Moore" 2007)
  18. Re: What really killed WebDNA? ( "Dan Strong" 2007)
  19. Re: What really killed WebDNA? ( Gary Krockover 2007)
  20. Re: What really killed WebDNA? ( Claude Gelinas 2007)
  21. Re: What really killed WebDNA? ( Stuart Tremain 2007)
  22. Re: What really killed WebDNA? ( "Vincent Medina" 2007)
  23. What really killed WebDNA? ( "Will Starck" 2007)
The WebDNA MySQL combination never quite worked right. It's partially useable, but many SQL calls w/ functions returned bogus values. -- Jesse Proudman, Blue Box Group, LLC On Oct 22, 2007, at 10:10 AM, Donovan Brooke wrote: >> 1. Scalability. A RAM-resident database is extremely fast, but it >> puts all >> your eggs in one basket. The html and the database have to reside >> on the >> same machine which prevents load-balancing. > > Even if you use mySql databases? ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ Jesse Proudman

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

FORMS: Returning a specific page (1997) Public beta 3 of WebCatalog 4.0 is now available (2000) RE: Signal Raised (1997) Hideif not working? (2001) WebCatalog f2 Installation (1997) WC2f3 (1997) Banner DNA (1997) Searching a field and returning the highest value (1997) serial number generation (1997) WebMerchant 3.0? (1998) Canadian Credit Card processing co, from a Mac (2001) Double Spacing in Mails from Sendmail (2002) Generating Report Totals (1997) Limit picture size on upload (2005) wee problem (2001) Database flushing does not work any more... (2000) WebCat2.0 [format thousands .0f] no go (1997) preserving the zero's (1999) Emailer 1.0.2 Conflicts? (1998) What am I doing wrong? (2000)