Re: What really killed WebDNA?

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2007


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 69385
interpreted = N
texte = The WebDNA MySQL combination never quite worked right. It's partially useable, but many SQL calls w/ functions returned bogus values. -- Jesse Proudman, Blue Box Group, LLC On Oct 22, 2007, at 10:10 AM, Donovan Brooke wrote: >> 1. Scalability. A RAM-resident database is extremely fast, but it >> puts all >> your eggs in one basket. The html and the database have to reside >> on the >> same machine which prevents load-balancing. > > Even if you use mySql databases? ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: What really killed WebDNA? ( Toby Cox 2007)
  2. Re: What really killed WebDNA? ( Larry Hewitt 2007)
  3. Re: What really killed WebDNA? ( Jesse Proudman 2007)
  4. Re: What really killed WebDNA? ( Donovan Brooke 2007)
  5. Re: What really killed WebDNA? ( Clint Davis 2007)
  6. Re: What really killed WebDNA? ( Matthew Bohne 2007)
  7. Re: What really killed WebDNA? ( "Gary Krockover" 2007)
  8. Re: What really killed WebDNA? ( Paul Willis 2007)
  9. Re: What really killed WebDNA? ( "Dan Strong" 2007)
  10. Re: What really killed WebDNA? ( Dean Smith 2007)
  11. Re: What really killed WebDNA? ( Frank Nordberg 2007)
  12. Re: What really killed WebDNA? ( "Will Starck" 2007)
  13. Re: What really killed WebDNA? ( Charles Kline 2007)
  14. Re: What really killed WebDNA? ( Frank Nordberg 2007)
  15. Re: What really killed WebDNA? ( Donovan Brooke 2007)
  16. Re: What really killed WebDNA? ( Stuart Tremain 2007)
  17. Re: What really killed WebDNA? ( "Chris Moore" 2007)
  18. Re: What really killed WebDNA? ( "Dan Strong" 2007)
  19. Re: What really killed WebDNA? ( Gary Krockover 2007)
  20. Re: What really killed WebDNA? ( Claude Gelinas 2007)
  21. Re: What really killed WebDNA? ( Stuart Tremain 2007)
  22. Re: What really killed WebDNA? ( "Vincent Medina" 2007)
  23. What really killed WebDNA? ( "Will Starck" 2007)
The WebDNA MySQL combination never quite worked right. It's partially useable, but many SQL calls w/ functions returned bogus values. -- Jesse Proudman, Blue Box Group, LLC On Oct 22, 2007, at 10:10 AM, Donovan Brooke wrote: >> 1. Scalability. A RAM-resident database is extremely fast, but it >> puts all >> your eggs in one basket. The html and the database have to reside >> on the >> same machine which prevents load-balancing. > > Even if you use mySql databases? ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ Jesse Proudman

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

RE: new cart IDs being assigned somehow (1997) Problem during evaluation of WebCatalog (1998) TCPConnect (2005) Apache suffix mapping for .tpl (2000) adding options to form (2004) [Replace] really replaces? (2000) WebCat2 - [format thousands] (1997) Emailer update for Mac? (1998) 4.5 Upgrade (2003) Webcat2, WebCommerce, Mod 10 etc. (1997) writing orders to a db (1997) Processing all html files through WebCat or Typhoon (1998) Reserved Words (2003) Suggestions for Topics to be covered in an Advanced WebDNACourse... (1998) [DOS] (1999) shipping costs (1997) How To question on setting up downloads (1997) Error.html (1997) dumb questions. (2000) international time (1997)