Re: Webcat no longer supported?

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2006


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 67744
interpreted = N
texte = I say we get 50 people to put in $5,000. We make it open source and give it life!!!! Who's in? > On Fri, 07 Jul 2006 10:04:57 -0500 > Dale Lists wrote: >> Of course a possibly less expensive way would be to have everyone buy 1-2 >> shares of SM stock, >> then they would be required (I believe) to answer questions from >> stockholders. > > > Now THAT is an excellent thought and likely would lead to some answers. > Current price is > $14.74/share. > > I'm not really sure that the market for WebDNA is large enough to support > investment by anyone who > wasn't prepared to do battle with the marketing and development budgets of > Microsoft and > Adobe/Macromedia. Let's be realistic: php is free, so there's no sense even > trying to compete with > that, and anyone who is willing to pay for a server-side scripting language is > going to go for the > 'shiniest' one with the best marketing and support, so unless WebDNA can be > upgraded to keep up > with the times and then also made super-shiny to grab those who would > otherwise buy CF or > ASP/dotNet, etc. then, to me, there really is no future in the product for > anybody but those of us > who still use it. > > That said, it seems to me that open-sourcing would be the only viable option > for those of us who > don't want to let go. Would SM do it? I don't know. Probably not. What's in it > for them? Maybe we > could start a non-profit co. and then SM could 'donate' WebDNA to us so that > way at least they > could get a tax write-off on it. > > Just thinking out loud... > -Dan > > ------------------------------------------------------------- > This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to > the mailing list . > To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to > > Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ > ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: Webcat no longer supported? ( Stuart Tremain 2006)
  2. Re: Webcat no longer supported? ( Chris 2006)
  3. Re: Webcat no longer supported? ( Donovan Brooke 2006)
  4. Re: Webcat no longer supported? ( HipCitySales 2006)
  5. Re: Webcat no longer supported? ( "Jesse Proudman" 2006)
  6. Re: Webcat no longer supported? ( Gary Krockover 2006)
  7. Re: Webcat no longer supported? ( Ross Markbreiter 2006)
  8. Re: Webcat no longer supported? ( "Bess Ho" 2006)
  9. Re: Webcat no longer supported? ( Adam O'Connor 2006)
  10. Re: Webcat no longer supported? ( "Bess Ho" 2006)
  11. Re: Webcat no longer supported? ( "Bess Ho" 2006)
  12. Re: Webcat no longer supported? ( "Bess Ho" 2006)
  13. Re: Webcat no longer supported? ( Donovan Brooke 2006)
  14. Re: Webcat no longer supported? ( Ross Markbreiter 2006)
  15. Re: Webcat no longer supported? ( "Brian B. Burton" 2006)
  16. Re: Webcat no longer supported? ( Ross Markbreiter 2006)
  17. Re: Webcat no longer supported? ( Donovan Brooke 2006)
  18. Re: Webcat no longer supported? ( Donovan Brooke 2006)
  19. Re: Webcat no longer supported? ( Jay Van Vark 2006)
  20. Re: Webcat no longer supported? ( Larry Hewitt 2006)
  21. Re: Webcat no longer supported? ( Adam O'Connor 2006)
  22. Re: Webcat no longer supported? ( Adam O'Connor 2006)
  23. Re: Webcat no longer supported? ( "Dan Strong" 2006)
  24. Re: Webcat no longer supported? ( Jay Van Vark 2006)
  25. Re: Webcat no longer supported? ( "Dan Strong" 2006)
  26. Re: Webcat no longer supported? ( Jay Van Vark 2006)
  27. Re: Webcat no longer supported? ( Grant Hulbert 2006)
  28. Re: Webcat no longer supported? ( John Peacock 2006)
  29. Re: Webcat no longer supported? ( Jesse Proudman 2006)
  30. Re: Webcat no longer supported? ( "Dan Strong" 2006)
  31. Re: Webcat no longer supported? ( Matthew Bohne 2006)
  32. Re: Webcat no longer supported? ( Dale Lists 2006)
  33. Re: Webcat no longer supported? ( Donovan Brooke 2006)
  34. Re: Webcat no longer supported? ( Donovan Brooke 2006)
  35. Re: Webcat no longer supported? ( Terry Wilson 2006)
  36. Re: Webcat no longer supported? ( Matthew Bohne 2006)
  37. Re: Webcat no longer supported? ( Steve Craig 2006)
  38. Re: Webcat no longer supported? ( Chris 2006)
  39. Re: [ot] New List. Was: Re: Webcat no longer supported? ( "Dan Strong" 2006)
  40. Re: [ot] New List. Was: Re: Webcat no longer supported? ( Donovan Brooke 2006)
  41. Re: Webcat no longer supported? ( Jesse Proudman 2006)
  42. Re: Webcat no longer supported? ( Dale Lists 2006)
  43. Re: Webcat no longer supported? ( Jesse Proudman 2006)
  44. Re: Webcat no longer supported? ( "Bess Ho" 2006)
  45. Re: Webcat no longer supported? ( "Bess Ho" 2006)
  46. Re: Webcat no longer supported? ( "Bess Ho" 2006)
  47. Re: [ot] New List. Was: Re: Webcat no longer supported? ( Gary Krockover 2006)
  48. Re: [ot] New List. Was: Re: Webcat no longer supported? ( Stuart Tremain 2006)
  49. Re: [ot] New List. Was: Re: Webcat no longer supported? ( Pat McCormick 2006)
  50. Re: [ot] New List. Was: Re: Webcat no longer supported? ( Donovan Brooke 2006)
  51. [ot] New List. Was: Re: Webcat no longer supported? ( Jesse Proudman 2006)
  52. Re: Webcat no longer supported? ( David Cate 2006)
  53. Re: Webcat no longer supported? ( Donovan Brooke 2006)
  54. Re: Webcat no longer supported? ( Alex McCombie 2006)
  55. Re: Webcat no longer supported? ( "Dan Strong" 2006)
  56. Re: Webcat no longer supported? ( Terry Wilson 2006)
  57. Re: Webcat no longer supported? ( Donovan Brooke 2006)
  58. Re: Webcat no longer supported? ( Alex McCombie 2006)
  59. Re: Webcat no longer supported? ( Jay Van Vark 2006)
  60. Re: Webcat no longer supported? ( Adam O'Connor 2006)
  61. Re: Webcat no longer supported? ( John Peacock 2006)
  62. Re: Webcat no longer supported? ( Adam O'Connor 2006)
  63. Re: Webcat no longer supported? ( John Peacock 2006)
  64. Re: Webcat no longer supported? ( Donovan Brooke 2006)
  65. Re: Webcat no longer supported? ( Pat McCormick 2006)
  66. Re: Webcat no longer supported? ( "Dan Strong" 2006)
  67. Re: Webcat no longer supported? ( Adam O'Connor 2006)
  68. Re: Webcat no longer supported? ( Donovan Brooke 2006)
  69. Re: Webcat no longer supported? ( Adam O'Connor 2006)
  70. Re: Webcat no longer supported? ( "Dan Strong" 2006)
  71. Re: Webcat no longer supported? ( Pat McCormick 2006)
  72. Re: Webcat no longer supported? ( Stuart Tremain 2006)
  73. Re: Webcat no longer supported? ( Donovan Brooke 2006)
  74. Re: Webcat no longer supported? ( Alex McCombie 2006)
  75. Re: Webcat no longer supported? ( "Dan Strong" 2006)
  76. Re: Webcat no longer supported? ( Alex McCombie 2006)
  77. Webcat no longer supported? ( Adam O'Connor 2006)
I say we get 50 people to put in $5,000. We make it open source and give it life!!!! Who's in? > On Fri, 07 Jul 2006 10:04:57 -0500 > Dale Lists wrote: >> Of course a possibly less expensive way would be to have everyone buy 1-2 >> shares of SM stock, >> then they would be required (I believe) to answer questions from >> stockholders. > > > Now THAT is an excellent thought and likely would lead to some answers. > Current price is > $14.74/share. > > I'm not really sure that the market for WebDNA is large enough to support > investment by anyone who > wasn't prepared to do battle with the marketing and development budgets of > Microsoft and > Adobe/Macromedia. Let's be realistic: php is free, so there's no sense even > trying to compete with > that, and anyone who is willing to pay for a server-side scripting language is > going to go for the > 'shiniest' one with the best marketing and support, so unless WebDNA can be > upgraded to keep up > with the times and then also made super-shiny to grab those who would > otherwise buy CF or > ASP/dotNet, etc. then, to me, there really is no future in the product for > anybody but those of us > who still use it. > > That said, it seems to me that open-sourcing would be the only viable option > for those of us who > don't want to let go. Would SM do it? I don't know. Probably not. What's in it > for them? Maybe we > could start a non-profit co. and then SM could 'donate' WebDNA to us so that > way at least they > could get a tax write-off on it. > > Just thinking out loud... > -Dan > > ------------------------------------------------------------- > This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to > the mailing list . > To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to > > Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ > ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ HipCitySales

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

Default contains WEBDNA (1998) attacment pdf (2001) Multiple catalog databases and showcart (1997) Search/sort in URL Was: GuestBook example (1997) Search results templates (1996) Which GUI HTML editors work with WC ? (1997) minimalist shopping cart. (1997) access denied problem (1997) Windows 2.1b4 WebCatalog available (1997) Limit on nested [ShowIf]'s? (1997) carriage returns in data (1997) Setting up the server (1997) watch out for format_to_days on NT (1997) Separate SSL Server (1997) PCS Frames-Default page is solution! (1997) Share Snippet? (1999) [WebDNA] Dynamic vertical columns (2008) Combining search criteria (2000) [WebDNA] multi [sendmail] inside [search] (2012) Bug Report, maybe (1997)