Re: 5.0 Pricing

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2003


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 48092
interpreted = N
texte = Kenneth Grome wrote: >> I read dougs notes as there is no limitation on sub domains. > > > As far as I am concerned, we should be able to designate the web > server's root folder as the ONE SANDBOX that comes with the new version, > and then we can serve *ALL* our domains from that one sandbox -- which > is exactly what we have been doing for years. > > Are you trying to tell us that this is no longer going to be possible??? > No, the sandbox feature has nothing to do with the licensing. This has been discussed several times. You can have multiple sandboxes for each domain: www.mydomain.com/sandbox1 www.mydomain.com/sandbox2 www.mydomain.com/sandbox3all running under a single site license. These are all completely independently managed areas with seperate admin files, etc. If they did this right, it also means that sandbox2 can die screaming due to bad code and it won't take the whole server with it!John-- John Peacock Director of Information Research and Technology Rowman & Littlefield Publishing Group 4720 Boston Way Lanham, MD 20706 301-459-3366 x.5010 fax 301-429-5747 ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: Was 5.0 Pricing, now Sandbox versus Website and ruminating (Clint Davis 2003)
  2. Re: Was 5.0 Pricing, now Sandbox versus Website and ruminating (Jim Lanford 2003)
  3. Re: Was 5.0 Pricing, now Sandbox versus Website and ruminating (Paul Willis 2003)
  4. Re: Was 5.0 Pricing, now Sandbox versus Website and ruminating (WJ Starck 2003)
  5. Re: Was 5.0 Pricing, now Sandbox versus Website and ruminating (Clement Ross 2003)
  6. Re: Was 5.0 Pricing, now Sandbox versus Website and ruminating (Donovan 2003)
  7. Re: Was 5.0 Pricing, now Sandbox versus Website and ruminating (Kimberly D. Walls 2003)
  8. Re: Was 5.0 Pricing, now Sandbox versus Website and ruminating (John Peacock 2003)
  9. Re: Was 5.0 Pricing, now Sandbox versus Website and ruminating (Donovan 2003)
  10. Re: Was 5.0 Pricing, now Sandbox versus Website and ruminating (Nitai @ ComputerOil 2003)
  11. Re: Was 5.0 Pricing, now Sandbox versus Website and ruminating (Paul Uttermohlen 2003)
  12. Re: Was 5.0 Pricing, now Sandbox versus Website and ruminating (Donovan 2003)
  13. Re: Was 5.0 Pricing, now Sandbox versus Website and ruminating (Alex McCombie 2003)
  14. Re: Was 5.0 Pricing, now Sandbox versus Website and ruminating (Nitai @ ComputerOil 2003)
  15. Re: Was 5.0 Pricing, now Sandbox versus Website and ruminating (Donovan 2003)
  16. Re: Was 5.0 Pricing, now Sandbox versus Website and ruminating (Brian Fries 2003)
  17. Re: Was 5.0 Pricing, now Sandbox versus Website and ruminating (Bob Minor 2003)
  18. Re: Was 5.0 Pricing, now Sandbox versus Website and ruminating (Jesse Williams-Proudman 2003)
  19. Re: Was 5.0 Pricing, now Sandbox versus Website and ruminating (Phillip Bonesteele 2003)
  20. Re: Was 5.0 Pricing, now Sandbox versus Website and ruminating (WJ Starck 2003)
  21. Was 5.0 Pricing, now Sandbox versus Website and ruminating (Phillip Bonesteele 2003)
  22. Re: 5.0 Pricing (John Peacock 2003)
  23. Re: New Title was: 5.0 pricing (laurent pladys 2003)
  24. Re: 5.0 Pricing (Kenneth Grome 2003)
  25. Re: 5.0 Pricing (Kenneth Grome 2003)
  26. Re: 5.0 Pricing (Bob Minor 2003)
  27. Re: 5.0 Pricing (Donovan 2003)
  28. Re: 5.0 Pricing (Donovan 2003)
  29. Re: 5.0 Pricing (Stuart Tremain 2003)
  30. Re: 5.0 Pricing (Alain Russell 2003)
  31. Re: 5.0 Pricing (John Peacock 2003)
  32. Re: 5.0 Pricing (Alain Russell 2003)
  33. Re: 5.0 Pricing (Donovan 2003)
  34. Re: 5.0 Pricing (Alain Russell 2003)
  35. Re: 5.0 Pricing (Kenneth Grome 2003)
  36. Re: 5.0 Pricing (John Peacock 2003)
  37. Re: 5.0 Pricing (Jesse Williams-Proudman 2003)
  38. Re: 5.0 Pricing (Alex McCombie 2003)
  39. Re: 5.0 Pricing (Tim Robinson 2003)
  40. Re: 5.0 Pricing (Kenneth Grome 2003)
  41. Re: 5.0 Pricing (Dale's Stuff 2003)
  42. Re: 5.0 Pricing (Christer Olsson 2003)
  43. Re: 5.0 Pricing (Brian Fries 2003)
  44. Re: 5.0 Pricing (Michael Davis 2003)
  45. Re: 5.0 Pricing (Doug Deck 2003)
  46. Re: 5.0 Pricing (Donovan Brooke 2003)
  47. Re: 5.0 Pricing (Nitai @ ComputerOil 2003)
  48. Re: 5.0 Pricing (Stuart Tremain 2003)
  49. Re: 5.0 Pricing (Christer Olsson 2003)
  50. Re: 5.0 Pricing (Palle Bo Nielsen 2003)
  51. Re: 5.0 Pricing (Donovan 2003)
  52. Re: 5.0 Pricing (Doug Deck 2003)
  53. Re: 5.0 Pricing (Nitai @ ComputerOil 2003)
  54. Re: 5.0 Pricing (Alain Russell 2003)
  55. Re: 5.0 Pricing (Andrew Simpson 2003)
  56. Re: 5.0 Pricing (Doug Deck 2003)
  57. Re: 5.0 Pricing (WJ Starck 2003)
  58. Re: 5.0 Pricing (Nitai @ ComputerOil 2003)
  59. Re: 5.0 Pricing (Alain Russell 2003)
  60. Re: 5.0 Pricing (Dale's Stuff 2003)
  61. Re: 5.0 Pricing (Doug Deck 2003)
  62. Re: 5.0 Pricing (Doug Deck 2003)
  63. Re: 5.0 Pricing (Palle Bo Nielsen 2003)
  64. Re: 5.0 Pricing (andy mowrey 2003)
  65. Re: 5.0 Pricing (Clement Ross 2003)
  66. 5.0 Pricing (Charles Kline 2003)
Kenneth Grome wrote: >> I read dougs notes as there is no limitation on sub domains. > > > As far as I am concerned, we should be able to designate the web > server's root folder as the ONE SANDBOX that comes with the new version, > and then we can serve *ALL* our domains from that one sandbox -- which > is exactly what we have been doing for years. > > Are you trying to tell us that this is no longer going to be possible??? > No, the sandbox feature has nothing to do with the licensing. This has been discussed several times. You can have multiple sandboxes for each domain: www.mydomain.com/sandbox1 www.mydomain.com/sandbox2 www.mydomain.com/sandbox3all running under a single site license. These are all completely independently managed areas with seperate admin files, etc. If they did this right, it also means that sandbox2 can die screaming due to bad code and it won't take the whole server with it!John-- John Peacock Director of Information Research and Technology Rowman & Littlefield Publishing Group 4720 Boston Way Lanham, MD 20706 301-459-3366 x.5010 fax 301-429-5747 ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ John Peacock

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

Re:emailer 150 (1997) ShippingCosts (1998) sorting and grouping (1998) List Archives (2000) [WriteFile] problems (1997) Listserver problem (1997) [delete] problem (1997) [UPPERCASE] (1997) default value from Lookup (was Grant, please help me) (1997) Repost: Orderfile, Grandtotal: How do I get it to all add up. (2000) RE: Formulas.db + Users.db (1997) 2nd WebCatalog2 Feature Request (1996) Strange error (2000) browser info.txt and SSL (1997) Authenticate (1997) Multiple Passwords (1997) Showing Results Alphabetically in Columns (top to bottom) (2002) Donovans Theorem (2003) [protect admin] (1997) Image upload (2000)