Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA future

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2010


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 104408
interpreted = N
texte = You are a shareholder Donovan. Feel free to ask privately. WebDNA is not = obsessed with secrecy, but some information are not for public release = yet. - chris On Jan 12, 2010, at 17:59, Donovan Brooke wrote: > christophe.billiottet@webdna.us wrote: >> First of all, we do not remove anything, on the contrary: we fill out = the documentation; compare http://www.webdna.us/page.dna?numero=3D84 = with the old http://docs.webdna.us/ArraySetContext.html for instance. >> Unfortunately, "anyone best interest" (as Ken said) is not attracting = many new customers. We put WebDNA on the right track and make everything = right. Some will offer resistance to changes and just argue about = anything, but we want to move forward and give WebDNA the commercial = success it deserves, which would translate into an easy to install, easy = to use, solid, fast and stable product. >> We focuse on the core engine, while the external applications like = StoreBuilder and CMS will become external offers. >> An engine that could run on most platforms with most webservers = implies a fastCGI architecture (remember 6.2 only runs with apache 2.2 = which has been a serious limitation for years, without any benefit). = "fastCGI" implies no more sandboxes, which will disappear. The URL = command will be deprecated as it can jeopardise security and is not used = anymore. The licensing system has been entirely rewritten, simplified, = is cross-platform and will allow one WebDNA copy to run on a single = website, for a cheap price. We are working on many more modifications at = this time. The WebDNA version is already running but needs more work. >> About the question "will you still support the module version of = WebDNA", answer is "yes". >> In the future, i was thinking in parallel processing WebDNA servers = and high resilience WebDNA database servers using clusters with fully = scalable solutions. But this is another story... :-) >> - chris--------------------------------------------------------- >=20 > Thanks Chris,.. I think more clarifications on your vision > would be appreciated publicly for us as > small business men etc.. to > know where we are going with WebDNA: >=20 > Can you clarify what will be included in both app types and what = won't? >=20 > If you need to keep it a secret, then that is fine... but > it doesn't hurt to ask, right!? >=20 >=20 > Will the module app type remain as-is? > - globals directory? > - xml contexts? > - Sandboxes? > - commands? > - ide, sitebuilder etc?? > - admin interface >=20 > Will the fastCGI app have: > - Globals directory? > - XML? > - admin interface? >=20 > Thanks, > Donovan >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 > --=20 > Donovan Brooke > Euca Design Center > [Practical-Ethical-Efficient] > www.euca.us > egg.bz > artglass-forum.com > --------------------------------------------------------- > This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to > the mailing list . > To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us > old archives: http://dev.webdna.us/TalkListArchive/ > Bug Reporting: = http://forum.webdna.us/eucabb.html?page=3Dtopics&category=3D288 Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA future (Jym Duane 2010)
  2. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA future (Kenneth Grome 2010)
  3. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA future (Kenneth Grome 2010)
  4. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA future (Donovan Brooke 2010)
  5. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA future (christophe.billiottet@webdna.us 2010)
  6. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA future (Kenneth Grome 2010)
  7. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA future (Bob Minor 2010)
  8. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA future (christophe.billiottet@webdna.us 2010)
  9. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA future (Kenneth Grome 2010)
  10. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA future (Govinda 2010)
  11. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA future (Dan Strong 2010)
  12. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA future (Donovan Brooke 2010)
  13. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA future (Bob Minor 2010)
  14. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA future (Donovan Brooke 2010)
  15. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA future (christophe.billiottet@webdna.us 2010)
  16. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA future (christophe.billiottet@webdna.us 2010)
  17. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA future (Dan Strong 2010)
  18. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA future (Kenneth Grome 2010)
  19. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA future (Brian Fries 2010)
  20. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA future (Govinda 2010)
  21. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA future ("Terry Wilson" 2010)
  22. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA future (Kenneth Grome 2010)
  23. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA future (Donovan Brooke 2010)
  24. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA future (christophe.billiottet@webdna.us 2010)
  25. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA future (christophe.billiottet@webdna.us 2010)
  26. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA future ("JD Ready" 12:4)
  27. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA future ("Terry Wilson" 2010)
  28. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA future (Donovan Brooke 2010)
  29. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA future (Kenneth Grome 2010)
  30. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA future (Brian Fries 2010)
  31. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA future (Kenneth Grome 2010)
  32. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA future (christophe.billiottet@webdna.us 2010)
  33. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA future (Kenneth Grome 2010)
  34. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA future (christophe.billiottet@webdna.us 2010)
  35. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA future (christophe.billiottet@webdna.us 2010)
  36. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA future (Kenneth Grome 2010)
  37. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA future (Rob 2010)
  38. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA future (Donovan Brooke 2010)
  39. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA future (christophe.billiottet@webdna.us 2010)
  40. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA future (Bob Minor 2010)
  41. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA future (christophe.billiottet@webdna.us 2010)
  42. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA future (Donovan Brooke 2010)
  43. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA future (christophe.billiottet@webdna.us 2010)
  44. [WebDNA] WebDNA future (christophe.billiottet@webdna.us 2010)
You are a shareholder Donovan. Feel free to ask privately. WebDNA is not = obsessed with secrecy, but some information are not for public release = yet. - chris On Jan 12, 2010, at 17:59, Donovan Brooke wrote: > christophe.billiottet@webdna.us wrote: >> First of all, we do not remove anything, on the contrary: we fill out = the documentation; compare http://www.webdna.us/page.dna?numero=3D84 = with the old http://docs.webdna.us/ArraySetContext.html for instance. >> Unfortunately, "anyone best interest" (as Ken said) is not attracting = many new customers. We put WebDNA on the right track and make everything = right. Some will offer resistance to changes and just argue about = anything, but we want to move forward and give WebDNA the commercial = success it deserves, which would translate into an easy to install, easy = to use, solid, fast and stable product. >> We focuse on the core engine, while the external applications like = StoreBuilder and CMS will become external offers. >> An engine that could run on most platforms with most webservers = implies a fastCGI architecture (remember 6.2 only runs with apache 2.2 = which has been a serious limitation for years, without any benefit). = "fastCGI" implies no more sandboxes, which will disappear. The URL = command will be deprecated as it can jeopardise security and is not used = anymore. The licensing system has been entirely rewritten, simplified, = is cross-platform and will allow one WebDNA copy to run on a single = website, for a cheap price. We are working on many more modifications at = this time. The WebDNA version is already running but needs more work. >> About the question "will you still support the module version of = WebDNA", answer is "yes". >> In the future, i was thinking in parallel processing WebDNA servers = and high resilience WebDNA database servers using clusters with fully = scalable solutions. But this is another story... :-) >> - chris--------------------------------------------------------- >=20 > Thanks Chris,.. I think more clarifications on your vision > would be appreciated publicly for us as > small business men etc.. to > know where we are going with WebDNA: >=20 > Can you clarify what will be included in both app types and what = won't? >=20 > If you need to keep it a secret, then that is fine... but > it doesn't hurt to ask, right!? >=20 >=20 > Will the module app type remain as-is? > - globals directory? > - xml contexts? > - Sandboxes? > - commands? > - ide, sitebuilder etc?? > - admin interface >=20 > Will the fastCGI app have: > - Globals directory? > - XML? > - admin interface? >=20 > Thanks, > Donovan >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 > --=20 > Donovan Brooke > Euca Design Center > [Practical-Ethical-Efficient] > www.euca.us > egg.bz > artglass-forum.com > --------------------------------------------------------- > This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to > the mailing list . > To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us > old archives: http://dev.webdna.us/TalkListArchive/ > Bug Reporting: = http://forum.webdna.us/eucabb.html?page=3Dtopics&category=3D288 christophe.billiottet@webdna.us

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

AppleScript question (1997) HELP WITH DATES (1997) WebCatalog can't find database (1997) Help name our technology! I found it (1997) Separate SSL Server (1997) Nested tags count question (1997) [username][password] not showing up! HELP! (1999) What am I missing (1997) SSL, WebSTAR, WebCatalog (1998) format_to_days on NT (1997) [WebDNA] WebDNA 7.0 (2011) problems with WebCat-Plugin (1997) Job in Wash. DC (2000) [TaxableTotal] - not working with AOL and IE (1997) Uh...can someone help me out with the b10? (1997) Comments in db? (1997) Webcatalog error, Plug-in for Webstar (1996) WC2f3 (1997) unique ascending numbers (2003) Nested vs conditional (1997)