Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA future

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2010


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 104458
interpreted = N
texte = Chris - I am not particularly familiar with how the fastCGI version will operate = vs. the module version. Can you give a quick rundown on this? In my particular usage, I typically run multiple domains on the same = physical server, sharing extensive function libraries and db = repositories stored in globals. How will this change using fastCGI? Note that this is key to my future use of WebDNA, as I am constantly = defending the use of such a "non-standard" technology as the core of our = company's services. There is considerable pressure to move to a = different platform, despite the 8 years of development time that has = gone into our current systems. Brian Fries BrainScan Software On Jan 13, 2010, at 3:51 AM, christophe.billiottet@webdna.us wrote: > Because of the very core of the fastCGI, there will be no need for = globals or sandboxes: every single website owner will have full control = over his WebDNA fastCGI copy, license included. No need for a "part" = administration, or a central repository of functions. Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA future (Jym Duane 2010)
  2. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA future (Kenneth Grome 2010)
  3. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA future (Kenneth Grome 2010)
  4. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA future (Donovan Brooke 2010)
  5. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA future (christophe.billiottet@webdna.us 2010)
  6. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA future (Kenneth Grome 2010)
  7. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA future (Bob Minor 2010)
  8. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA future (christophe.billiottet@webdna.us 2010)
  9. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA future (Kenneth Grome 2010)
  10. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA future (Govinda 2010)
  11. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA future (Dan Strong 2010)
  12. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA future (Donovan Brooke 2010)
  13. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA future (Bob Minor 2010)
  14. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA future (Donovan Brooke 2010)
  15. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA future (christophe.billiottet@webdna.us 2010)
  16. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA future (christophe.billiottet@webdna.us 2010)
  17. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA future (Dan Strong 2010)
  18. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA future (Kenneth Grome 2010)
  19. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA future (Brian Fries 2010)
  20. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA future (Govinda 2010)
  21. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA future ("Terry Wilson" 2010)
  22. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA future (Kenneth Grome 2010)
  23. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA future (Donovan Brooke 2010)
  24. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA future (christophe.billiottet@webdna.us 2010)
  25. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA future (christophe.billiottet@webdna.us 2010)
  26. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA future ("JD Ready" 12:4)
  27. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA future ("Terry Wilson" 2010)
  28. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA future (Donovan Brooke 2010)
  29. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA future (Kenneth Grome 2010)
  30. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA future (Brian Fries 2010)
  31. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA future (Kenneth Grome 2010)
  32. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA future (christophe.billiottet@webdna.us 2010)
  33. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA future (Kenneth Grome 2010)
  34. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA future (christophe.billiottet@webdna.us 2010)
  35. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA future (christophe.billiottet@webdna.us 2010)
  36. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA future (Kenneth Grome 2010)
  37. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA future (Rob 2010)
  38. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA future (Donovan Brooke 2010)
  39. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA future (christophe.billiottet@webdna.us 2010)
  40. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA future (Bob Minor 2010)
  41. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA future (christophe.billiottet@webdna.us 2010)
  42. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA future (Donovan Brooke 2010)
  43. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA future (christophe.billiottet@webdna.us 2010)
  44. [WebDNA] WebDNA future (christophe.billiottet@webdna.us 2010)
Chris - I am not particularly familiar with how the fastCGI version will operate = vs. the module version. Can you give a quick rundown on this? In my particular usage, I typically run multiple domains on the same = physical server, sharing extensive function libraries and db = repositories stored in globals. How will this change using fastCGI? Note that this is key to my future use of WebDNA, as I am constantly = defending the use of such a "non-standard" technology as the core of our = company's services. There is considerable pressure to move to a = different platform, despite the 8 years of development time that has = gone into our current systems. Brian Fries BrainScan Software On Jan 13, 2010, at 3:51 AM, christophe.billiottet@webdna.us wrote: > Because of the very core of the fastCGI, there will be no need for = globals or sandboxes: every single website owner will have full control = over his WebDNA fastCGI copy, license included. No need for a "part" = administration, or a central repository of functions. Brian Fries

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

Two stores, one server (1998) Tip for making barcharts (1997) Test (2003) [WebDNA] macOS 10.13.3 and WebDNA Mac Server 8.5.1 - hick-up (2019) [BULK] [WebDNA] abstraction code can be tricky... (2012) too many nested tags ... (1997) Missing something simple?? (1998) html in a database (1998) includes and cart numbers (1997) Tracking E-mail click thrus (2001) [ShowIf] if the varieable exists (1998) [WebDNA] Pages dying (2008) ShowNext truncating passed variable?? (1997) Security Hole - NetCloak Update (1998) (1997) emailer (1997) Whats wrong with this code? (1998) cookies and [returnraw] (1997) Formating found categories (1997) Multi shift click (1999)