Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA future
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 2010
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 104449
interpreted = N
texte = On Jan 13, 2010, at 13:22, Kenneth Grome wrote: > I actually wrote such a db-driven eCommerce system for Typhoon 10-15 = years ago. It was exceptionally flexible compared with the old cart = file system. But Typhoon died so I never bothered doing anything with = it. I wonder if I still have it on my hard drive somewhere? I'll have = to check. would be interesting if you find it and are willing to share... > In other words you're going to continue to maintain 6.2.1 basically as = 6.2 exists now (only with some bug fixes?) so people can still use = WebDNA the same way they have always used it. Yet for those with = simpler needs and an eye toward the future, your new standard product is = going to be the FastCGI version. Is this correct or have I = misunderstood something here? The fastCGI will not be the "poor man's choice", on the contrary: it = should be faster, more robust, should run under varied configurations, = platforms and webservers. Nginx has fastCGI support, so it should also = run with nginx too. If you take Ruby on Rails, it is only available as a fastCGI, and Lasso = is also doing the move to fastCGI. WebDNA fastCGI version with new licensing system is already running. = What we are working on at this time is the XSL / XSLT features and this = part needs a lot of work. The Windows version will follow, with a lot of = work there too. - chris
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
On Jan 13, 2010, at 13:22, Kenneth Grome wrote: > I actually wrote such a db-driven eCommerce system for Typhoon 10-15 = years ago. It was exceptionally flexible compared with the old cart = file system. But Typhoon died so I never bothered doing anything with = it. I wonder if I still have it on my hard drive somewhere? I'll have = to check. would be interesting if you find it and are willing to share... > In other words you're going to continue to maintain 6.2.1 basically as = 6.2 exists now (only with some bug fixes?) so people can still use = WebDNA the same way they have always used it. Yet for those with = simpler needs and an eye toward the future, your new standard product is = going to be the FastCGI version. Is this correct or have I = misunderstood something here? The fastCGI will not be the "poor man's choice", on the contrary: it = should be faster, more robust, should run under varied configurations, = platforms and webservers. Nginx has fastCGI support, so it should also = run with nginx too. If you take Ruby on Rails, it is only available as a fastCGI, and Lasso = is also doing the move to fastCGI. WebDNA fastCGI version with new licensing system is already running. = What we are working on at this time is the XSL / XSLT features and this = part needs a lot of work. The Windows version will follow, with a lot of = work there too. - chris
christophe.billiottet@webdna.us
DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!
Top Articles:
Talk List
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...
Related Readings:
Opposite of Summ=T? (2000)
SMSI - MacWorld (2005)
Unexpected error (1997)
ShowIf helper? (1998)
[OT] (waaaay OT) (2004)
Cookie setting (2003)
[WebDNA] Installation problem (Debian 6 64bit + Lighttpd) (2011)
Upgrade Pricing? (2003)
OT- AS/400 and Macs (2003)
contextual shownext (1998)
Date Sorting (1997)
Multiple download orders of the same product? (1997)
rotating thumbnails (1997)
Big Brother (just kidding, Ken) :) (2000)
[TaxableTotal] - not working with AOL and IE (1997)
DDEConnect and MSWord (1998)
Problems with [Applescript] (1997)
[WebDNA] Initial setup problems with 6.2 (2009)
+= (was RE: ++) (2005)
re: emailer prob (1998)