Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA future

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

12:4


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 104462
interpreted = N
texte = ----------------------- Sent from my Treo(r) smartphone -----Original Message----- From: "Terry Wilson" Date: Wednesday, Jan 13, 2010 12:34 pm Subject: Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA future To: Reply-To: The way I see it, the FastCGI version is for the newcomer out there who has no prior relationship with any of us. They want to learn and use WebDNA on one site, and at a low price, they can afford do that and learn at the same time without committing to their own server. The other customer is one or our clients who wants to keep their hosting elsewhere and be in charge of their own hosting. I for one would be more than happy to steer clients this way in order to throw new business to WSC. I too have a lot invested in shared code via the Globals folder. But more and more, I've been moving toward self-contained folders. When I develop a new site and make improvements to old shared code, it becomes a nuisance to check up on older sites to make sure these improvements work for them too. I don't mind moving away from a globals folder. Terry On Wed, 13 Jan 2010 12:00:02 -0600 Kenneth Grome wrote: > Hi Brian, > > My understanding is that you'll have to duplicate your >shared db's and repositories by making a copy for each >domain, assuming of course that you want to go the >FastCGI route rather than continuing with the regular >version of WebDNA. > > I think WSC will not be supporting the regular version >after 6.2.1 comes out though, so for the long term future >you might miss out on specific features added to the >FastCGI version but not the regular version. > > I'm just theorizing about this of course, so I'm going >to wait for Chris to confirm or deny these assumptions, >but if I'm not mistaken this is his general concept. > > Sincerely, > Kenneth Grome > www.KenGrome.com > > > > > > > >> Chris - >> >> I am not particularly familiar with how the fastCGI >>version will operate vs. the module version. Can you give >>a quick rundown on this? >> >> In my particular usage, I typically run multiple domains >>on the same physical server, sharing extensive function >>libraries and db repositories stored in globals. How will >>this change using fastCGI? >> >> Note that this is key to my future use of WebDNA, as I >>am constantly defending the use of such a "non-standard" >>technology as the core of our company's services. There >>is considerable pressure to move to a different platform, >>despite the 8 years of development time that has gone >>into our current systems. >> >> Brian Fries >> BrainScan Software > --------------------------------------------------------- > This message is sent to you because you are subscribed >to > the mailing list. > To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us > old archives: http://dev.webdna.us/TalkListArchive/ > Bug Reporting: >http://forum.webdna.us/eucabb.html?page=topics&category(8   Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA future (Jym Duane 2010)
  2. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA future (Kenneth Grome 2010)
  3. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA future (Kenneth Grome 2010)
  4. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA future (Donovan Brooke 2010)
  5. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA future (christophe.billiottet@webdna.us 2010)
  6. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA future (Kenneth Grome 2010)
  7. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA future (Bob Minor 2010)
  8. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA future (christophe.billiottet@webdna.us 2010)
  9. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA future (Kenneth Grome 2010)
  10. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA future (Govinda 2010)
  11. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA future (Dan Strong 2010)
  12. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA future (Donovan Brooke 2010)
  13. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA future (Bob Minor 2010)
  14. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA future (Donovan Brooke 2010)
  15. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA future (christophe.billiottet@webdna.us 2010)
  16. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA future (christophe.billiottet@webdna.us 2010)
  17. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA future (Dan Strong 2010)
  18. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA future (Kenneth Grome 2010)
  19. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA future (Brian Fries 2010)
  20. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA future (Govinda 2010)
  21. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA future ("Terry Wilson" 2010)
  22. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA future (Kenneth Grome 2010)
  23. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA future (Donovan Brooke 2010)
  24. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA future (christophe.billiottet@webdna.us 2010)
  25. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA future (christophe.billiottet@webdna.us 2010)
  26. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA future ("JD Ready" 12:4)
  27. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA future ("Terry Wilson" 2010)
  28. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA future (Donovan Brooke 2010)
  29. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA future (Kenneth Grome 2010)
  30. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA future (Brian Fries 2010)
  31. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA future (Kenneth Grome 2010)
  32. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA future (christophe.billiottet@webdna.us 2010)
  33. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA future (Kenneth Grome 2010)
  34. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA future (christophe.billiottet@webdna.us 2010)
  35. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA future (christophe.billiottet@webdna.us 2010)
  36. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA future (Kenneth Grome 2010)
  37. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA future (Rob 2010)
  38. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA future (Donovan Brooke 2010)
  39. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA future (christophe.billiottet@webdna.us 2010)
  40. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA future (Bob Minor 2010)
  41. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA future (christophe.billiottet@webdna.us 2010)
  42. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA future (Donovan Brooke 2010)
  43. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA future (christophe.billiottet@webdna.us 2010)
  44. [WebDNA] WebDNA future (christophe.billiottet@webdna.us 2010)
----------------------- Sent from my Treo(r) smartphone -----Original Message----- From: "Terry Wilson" Date: Wednesday, Jan 13, 2010 12:34 pm Subject: Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA future To: Reply-To: The way I see it, the FastCGI version is for the newcomer out there who has no prior relationship with any of us. They want to learn and use WebDNA on one site, and at a low price, they can afford do that and learn at the same time without committing to their own server. The other customer is one or our clients who wants to keep their hosting elsewhere and be in charge of their own hosting. I for one would be more than happy to steer clients this way in order to throw new business to WSC. I too have a lot invested in shared code via the Globals folder. But more and more, I've been moving toward self-contained folders. When I develop a new site and make improvements to old shared code, it becomes a nuisance to check up on older sites to make sure these improvements work for them too. I don't mind moving away from a globals folder. Terry On Wed, 13 Jan 2010 12:00:02 -0600 Kenneth Grome wrote: > Hi Brian, > > My understanding is that you'll have to duplicate your >shared db's and repositories by making a copy for each >domain, assuming of course that you want to go the >FastCGI route rather than continuing with the regular >version of WebDNA. > > I think WSC will not be supporting the regular version >after 6.2.1 comes out though, so for the long term future >you might miss out on specific features added to the >FastCGI version but not the regular version. > > I'm just theorizing about this of course, so I'm going >to wait for Chris to confirm or deny these assumptions, >but if I'm not mistaken this is his general concept. > > Sincerely, > Kenneth Grome > www.KenGrome.com > > > > > > > >> Chris - >> >> I am not particularly familiar with how the fastCGI >>version will operate vs. the module version. Can you give >>a quick rundown on this? >> >> In my particular usage, I typically run multiple domains >>on the same physical server, sharing extensive function >>libraries and db repositories stored in globals. How will >>this change using fastCGI? >> >> Note that this is key to my future use of WebDNA, as I >>am constantly defending the use of such a "non-standard" >>technology as the core of our company's services. There >>is considerable pressure to move to a different platform, >>despite the 8 years of development time that has gone >>into our current systems. >> >> Brian Fries >> BrainScan Software > --------------------------------------------------------- > This message is sent to you because you are subscribed >to > the mailing list. > To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us > old archives: http://dev.webdna.us/TalkListArchive/ > Bug Reporting: >http://forum.webdna.us/eucabb.html?page=topics&category(8   "JD Ready"

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

Cold Fusion Buster (1997) Problem 2 of 2 (was: Shipping Confusion) (2000) Requird Fields Error Message (2000) Any one heard from SM since that last email? (2006) More on the email templates (1997) shipcost (1997) Authorizenet and expiration dates (2002) unique ascending numbers (2003) Nationality (2003) Hosting Service (1998) Tracking (2004) DataBaseHelper Flawed (1997) Help name our technology! (1997) [WebDNA] WebDNA staging server (2008) Not really WebCat (1997) WebCat2b13MacPlugIn - [shownext method=post] ??? (1997) question: Eudora 3.1.1 (1997) Word wrapping (1997) Tax on shipping (1998) Internet Explorer 6 Form problems (2005)