Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA future
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 2010
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 104489
interpreted = N
texte = Terry Wilson wrote:> Exactly my thoughts. Now that PHP is running at every ISP, our job is a > little harder now than it would have been 5 or 10 years ago. I think the > FastCGI solution is step in the right direction though, to allow > independent programmers to get their feet wet without any real investment.> > > On Thu, 14 Jan 2010 12:13:05 -0600> Kenneth Grome
wrote:> >> What is the 1 thing that you think SMSI could have done> >>better when> >> they owned WebDNA to make it a more successful product> >>(aside from the> >> blatantly obvious end-of-support)?> >> > Marketing.> >> > So far every entity that has owned it has failed to> >market it effectively.> >> > Remember, Bill Gates did not have a better product, he> >simply marketed what he had.> >> > Sincerely,> > Kenneth Grome> > www.KenGrome.comIf nothing else could be done, If no other resources where available,that is where I'd put the resources, first (which I tried to do).Look, I want to be a bit revealing in my public remarks without "airingdirty laundry"... because I want to see WebDNA thrive some day...Chris and I had to deal with a *very* tight budget at times as wellas limited resources at times. Also, I don't think it's a secret thatChris is invested, perhaps more than any other, in thisventure. So, I don't take anything away from his contribution,nor his decisions that have obviously been considered carefullyby him considering his major investment...but, so far, Dan's videos are the *only* clever marketing thatWSC has done... and WSC didn't do them! ;-) We talked about manythings, but talk isn't action.Yes, our initial effort with marketing (MacWorld) was not as productiveas hoped (which I take responsibility for, and which I think Christophewas not happy about). But, it *was* allocating resources towards thenumber 1 concern... marketing. One or two other things were triedthat didn't work very well... but WSC's marketing should not halt justbecause of a couple less-than-desired efforts, right!?Live, learn, then try again. Clever and roll-up-the-sleeves marketing isthe only reason that "ISP's [server owners and administrators] are notbuying our product" (paraphrasing). Note, I would disagree andsay that we are indeed making sales to ISP's.Look, WebDNA is still here because of the talk list members... andI think it's important at this time, to get your input. WebDNA isnot in trouble so to speak, but it is my opinion that Chris could usesome real help with the venture. He may or may not be asking.. but as ashareholder, I am asking.I've had my fill for a while.. ;-).. so maybe someone else out thereis in the position, or has the desire to come forward? Chris has alwaysbeen open to listening to that kind of thing I think..so I suggest anyone that may want to help WebDNA out..time,money,position with the company.. to talk to Christohpe.For "WebDNA's Future".(how's that for bold remarks without airing dirty laundry?) ;-)Donovan-- Donovan BrookeEuca Design Center[Practical-Ethical-Efficient]www.euca.usegg.bzartglass-forum.com
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
Terry Wilson wrote:> Exactly my thoughts. Now that PHP is running at every ISP, our job is a > little harder now than it would have been 5 or 10 years ago. I think the > FastCGI solution is step in the right direction though, to allow > independent programmers to get their feet wet without any real investment.> > > On Thu, 14 Jan 2010 12:13:05 -0600> Kenneth Grome wrote:> >> What is the 1 thing that you think SMSI could have done> >>better when> >> they owned WebDNA to make it a more successful product> >>(aside from the> >> blatantly obvious end-of-support)?> >> > Marketing.> >> > So far every entity that has owned it has failed to> >market it effectively.> >> > Remember, Bill Gates did not have a better product, he> >simply marketed what he had.> >> > Sincerely,> > Kenneth Grome> > www.KenGrome.comIf nothing else could be done, If no other resources where available,that is where I'd put the resources, first (which I tried to do).Look, I want to be a bit revealing in my public remarks without "airingdirty laundry"... because I want to see WebDNA thrive some day...Chris and I had to deal with a *very* tight budget at times as wellas limited resources at times. Also, I don't think it's a secret thatChris is invested, perhaps more than any other, in thisventure. So, I don't take anything away from his contribution,nor his decisions that have obviously been considered carefullyby him considering his major investment...but, so far, Dan's videos are the *only* clever marketing thatWSC has done... and WSC didn't do them! ;-) We talked about manythings, but talk isn't action.Yes, our initial effort with marketing (MacWorld) was not as productiveas hoped (which I take responsibility for, and which I think Christophewas not happy about). But, it *was* allocating resources towards thenumber 1 concern... marketing. One or two other things were triedthat didn't work very well... but WSC's marketing should not halt justbecause of a couple less-than-desired efforts, right!?Live, learn, then try again. Clever and roll-up-the-sleeves marketing isthe only reason that "ISP's [server owners and administrators] are notbuying our product" (paraphrasing). Note, I would disagree andsay that we are indeed making sales to ISP's.Look, WebDNA is still here because of the Talk List members... andI think it's important at this time, to get your input. WebDNA isnot in trouble so to speak, but it is my opinion that Chris could usesome real help with the venture. He may or may not be asking.. but as ashareholder, I am asking.I've had my fill for a while.. ;-).. so maybe someone else out thereis in the position, or has the desire to come forward? Chris has alwaysbeen open to listening to that kind of thing I think..so I suggest anyone that may want to help WebDNA out..time,money,position with the company.. to talk to Christohpe.For "WebDNA's Future".(how's that for bold remarks without airing dirty laundry?) ;-)Donovan-- Donovan BrookeEuca Design Center[Practical-Ethical-Efficient]www.euca.usegg.bzartglass-forum.com
Donovan Brooke
DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!
Top Articles:
Talk List
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...
Related Readings:
Error 11 (1996)
RAM variables (1997)
Q: for those who use Cookies for sessions? (2004)
special commerce fields (1997)
Questions (1998)
WebCat2: multiple currency support (1997)
Applescript, WebDNA, and PDF (1997)
MacActivity and PCS (1997)
wierd [cart] action! (1997)
Re:FYI: Error message (1996)
Re1000001: Setting up shop (1997)
not interpreting Q (2001)
about this server and links to who (1997)
[WriteFile] problems (1997)
Hard Questions ? (1997)
NetForms for mail, sorry (1998)
Nice package (1998)
RE: protect tag not working (1998)
WebCommerce: Folder organization ? (1997)
Mac: LModelDirector bug fix (1997)