Re: Smith Micro - no competition

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2000


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 26588
interpreted = N
texte = Therio, Dale wrote: > > I have gotten 3 copies of this same SPAM today. They are obviously mining > this and other mailing lists for email addresses. > > I have NEVER been to any of their sites and have NEVER given my email > address to them. I hope SM takes the proper actions against these SPAMMERs > as they would expect me to take if one of my customers started spamming > them. > Indeed. Because; _some_ people on this list are:A) pretty vicious B) very talented and devious C) well versed in exactly what webcats weaknesses are D) Religiously anti-spam and anti Spammer E) Have root access to servers with more bandwidth available in a second than any 10 companies should reasonably need in a year...So, were I the person responsible for his crap, I think I might apologize to this list and start praying.------------------------------------------------------------- Brought to you by CommuniGate Pro - The Buzz Word Compliant Messaging Server. To end your Mail problems go to .This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: SPAM is SPAM is SPAM.... Re: Smith Micro - no competition (Nicolas Verhaeghe 2000)
  2. Re: SPAM is SPAM is SPAM.... Re: Smith Micro - no competition (The Mooseman 2000)
  3. SPAM is SPAM is SPAM.... Re: Smith Micro - no competition (Joseph D'Andrea 2000)
  4. Re: Smith Micro - no competition (Bob Schick 2000)
  5. Re: Smith Micro - no competition (Jay Van Vark 2000)
  6. Re: Smith Micro - no competition (Brian Wachter 2000)
  7. Re: Smith Micro - no competition (Aaron Lynch 2000)
  8. Re: Smith Micro - no competition (Therio, Dale 2000)
  9. Re: Smith Micro - no competition (Jay Van Vark 2000)
  10. Re: Smith Micro - no competition (Jay Van Vark 2000)
  11. Re: Smith Micro - no competition (Jay Van Vark 2000)
  12. Re: Smith Micro - no competition (Dave MacLeay 2000)
  13. Re: Smith Micro - no competition (The Mooseman 2000)
  14. Re: Smith Micro - no competition (Michael O Shea 2000)
  15. Re: Smith Micro - no competition (Therio, Dale 2000)
  16. Re: Smith Micro - no competition (Jesse Williams Proudman 2000)
  17. Re: Smith Micro - no competition (Jesse Williams Proudman 2000)
  18. Re: Smith Micro - no competition (Christopher Mackay 2000)
  19. Re: Smith Micro - no competition (Mike Davis 2000)
  20. Re: Smith Micro - no competition (Nicolas Verhaeghe 2000)
  21. Re: Smith Micro - no competition (Nicolas Verhaeghe 2000)
  22. Re: Smith Micro - no competition (Jay Van Vark 2000)
  23. Re: Smith Micro - no competition (Alex McCombie 2000)
  24. Re: Smith Micro - no competition (J Lane 2000)
  25. Re: Smith Micro - no competition (Jeff Logan 2000)
  26. Re: Smith Micro - no competition - Feedback (Kimberly D Ingram 2000)
  27. Re: Smith Micro - no competition (Alex McCombie 2000)
  28. Re: Smith Micro - no competition (Mike Davis 2000)
  29. Re: Smith Micro - no competition (Nicholas Carretta 2000)
  30. Re: Smith Micro - no competition (Jay Van Vark 2000)
  31. Re: Smith Micro - no competition (Jay Van Vark 2000)
  32. Re: Smith Micro - no competition (Jym Duane 2000)
  33. Re: Smith Micro - no competition (Overland 2000)
  34. Re: Smith Micro - no competition (Jeff Logan 2000)
  35. Re: Smith Micro - no competition (Nicolas Verhaeghe 2000)
  36. Re: Smith Micro - no competition (Jay Van Vark 2000)
  37. Re: Smith Micro - no competition (Dave MacLeay 2000)
  38. Re: Smith Micro - no competition (Kimberly D Ingram 2000)
  39. Smith Micro - no competition (Jeff Logan 2000)
  40. Re: Smith Micro - no competition (Will Starck 2000)
Therio, Dale wrote: > > I have gotten 3 copies of this same SPAM today. They are obviously mining > this and other mailing lists for email addresses. > > I have NEVER been to any of their sites and have NEVER given my email > address to them. I hope SM takes the proper actions against these SPAMMERs > as they would expect me to take if one of my customers started spamming > them. > Indeed. Because; _some_ people on this list are:A) pretty vicious B) very talented and devious C) well versed in exactly what webcats weaknesses are D) Religiously anti-spam and anti Spammer E) Have root access to servers with more bandwidth available in a second than any 10 companies should reasonably need in a year...So, were I the person responsible for his crap, I think I might apologize to this list and start praying.------------------------------------------------------------- Brought to you by CommuniGate Pro - The Buzz Word Compliant Messaging Server. To end your Mail problems go to .This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Aaron Lynch

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

Database field limit? (1998) BUG in [showif] using ^ (contains) (1997) .. more on sliding discounts... (1997) NetCloak, FireSite and PIXO (2000) Question (2000) international time (1997) .html to .tpl (1998) Missing something simple? (1999) No Data Results (1997) Search in 2 or more catalogs (1997) searching problem (1998) Date to Daze (1999) [item] appears after 'remove last item' ... (1997) Date problems-more (1997) RE: Loss in form (1998) Talk List Suggestions (1997) Behind the Scenes. . . (1998) $flushcache causes crash (2000) Log-in Scheme (2003) Logging purchases (1997)